Apr 3, 2009 11:30 AM
X3 Live and Computer Recording suggestions
-
Like (0)
I am looking to get some input on some computer specs for recording?
I am looking to replace an older computer with a new one or build one to use specifically for audio recording - PC based
Basic recording setup with my electric guitars/acoustic/and some vocals
I know I can build a bare bones system pretty cheap, but want some suggestions.....
Custom build or pre-configured ideas?
Component suggestions? Intel or AMD?
Are there any companies besides Sweetwater that custom builds for audio recording?
Thanks
I can't tell ya what to get but I can list the specs of the computer I put together myself.
AMD PH X4 9950 2.6G AM2+ Quad Core Chip
ASUS M3N72-D AM2+ NF750A Mainboard
4 GIGS CORS TWIN 2X4096 1066mhz DDR2 RAM
i personally would only buy an intel processor... based on my 15 years experience with computers...
also you will get a huge benefit in having alot of memory... for this reason i'd also go with an x64 system.
some people will surely hate this... but i'm A+, Net+, microsoft, unix, java certified etc...
and i'd just keep it simple and get something like a Dell...
its not like the old days when you couldn't do upgrades to these...
you get a nice package/price etc... really hard to compete with...
sure you can get a better system by handpicking every component... for a cost...
and then you have 9 different places for warranty service etc... not worth it...
i'm also not talking about the dirt cheap dell wal-mart model... a middle of the road dell...
that does most of what you want out of the box and has room for upgrading later etc...
*disclaimer... substitute dell for hp or whomever else...
in fact if you want dell's performance end... go with alienware.
Zap,
Thanks - I heard alot of good things about the HP's - getting better rating lately over Dell.
Any experience with Alienware - thought they were mostly for gamers?
Also, Dual core or Quad - will I really need that mush power in a small home studio environment?
i have a core 2 duo and it's great, i would love to have a quad, but ultimately for myself and probably you... it's a balance in price vs benefits...
the extra cpu headroom will be beneficial to you if you run alot of plug-ins or synths... i do... and they can eat up some cpu!
my overall experience with HP's has been good for the systems themselves but rather poor compared to the warranty on the dell...
alienware is MARKETED primarily to gamers, because they tend to demand higher performance...
it's still essentially just that... a high performance machine!
AMD or Intel......they both have their pluses and negatives. It comes down to personal prefrences. I've been using AMD for the last 10 years with no problems.
Heck, I have a intel 450mhz that still works today.....LOL
i know alot of people will agree with you... and to some extent you can get more "bang for your buck" with AMD...
but in my experience the stability of the intel cpu's has outweighed the benefits of slightly faster for a few bucks less...
i do currently use an AMD cpu in my HP machine at home, right next to my INTEL in my DELL
for real... i'm not making that up.... haha
but it is a preference... any current machine with multiple cores and the ability to upgrade will work for what you want...
the real good info would be to find out who has a machine without the USB dropouts and follow their lead. ![]()
that's funny. My X3 Live works on my HP (Intel chip) Vista 64 laptop and it works on my put together internet XP AMD dual core desktop. I haven't tried it on my AMD quad core yet.
yeah i'm certain that the processor isn't the only factor for the usb issue whatever it is... i'm sure there is still, chipset and maybe a usb controller chip to factor in...
there's always the possibility that you just got a wicked awesome x3
and wouldn't have the issues on any machine...
i personally have the issue on all of my machines... so i cry myself to sleep every night hoping to wake up to a fix... hahah
well, I did have the dropout on my old HP AMD laptop and on another two of my machines. I wish I could go "THATS THE PROBLEM!!!!! HERE"S HOW TO FIX IT!!!!" and then I could be the hero of the Line 6 forums. LOL![]()
if you could do that, we'd all have to nominate you for honorary stars next to your name... i mean.... after we all got back home from the parade in your honor ![]()
You do agree with this guy making sure that the hard drive to his system should a 75,000rpm and not a basic 54,000rpm, right?
i'm sure you mean 7200 vs 5400
and although the 7200rpm is clearly faster... you can get 10k or 15k rpm now too...
i certainly wouldn't go for the 5400... but all of the other ones will perform well...
to get the 10-15k you pay alot more money and lose capacity....
but they can have other benefits... some of which include SAS (serial attached scsi)
which is a 2.5 size and generates less heat and noise than the 3.5 drives.
but in a home studio environment the capacity is an issue as well...
again... it all comes down to steering your budget to find the right balance.
Yeah, for years I swore to use nothing but an Intel, but the two machines I've used for home use have been AMD. There have been times I've seen some quirkiness with them, but that could have been a typical Windows issue!
If it was a huge price difference, then AMD would be a no brainer, but right now reliability and stability are more important for me. But the AMD's in my opinion are just as good with the right combo of components.
Aside from the USB issue, I guess the latencey issue also arises too - I wonder if there will be a difference in that area based upon chipset? The other thing is power - I have an old house so the power is weird sometimes - you guys use any specific power conditioners or UPS backups?
I use Rackrider and Furman power conditioners along with some power filters to keep noise from the outlets.
i use a basic APC ups myself... a simple backups 350 model... i have an older house as well and i would certainly endorse getting one!
i also have a rackmount smartups 1400 on my home theater... good stuff.
you are probably right with the whole AMD vs Intel thing... but i would pay a little more for intel myself... piece of mind etc...
the majority of my AMD grudge is based on older AMD cpu's and my stubborn grudges for the hours of wasted time fixing issues because of them... hehe
it's certainly your decision ultimately... but i just want to let you know where my opinion comes from so you can't take it as you please.
Definately a power conditioner/UPS will go along way to preventing frustration.
With these Intel Dual Core/Quad systems and various chipsets and motherboard models it can get very confusing...
Even customizing a system with Dell you have the option of various chipset/processor upgrades - is there really much of a difference or what are some core things to look at with these various processor models?
Or minimum cache, etc requirements when doing audio recording?
speed wise as a percentage i minor jump can not be worth it... where you will notice the difference is cache on the cpu...
more cache allows the cpu to keep more information instead of calling out for it... in some applications this isn't needed...
in others its a tremendous difference in performance. i think the upgrade in the cache would be relevant towards use in a DAW.
another thing to remember is that sometimes the cache and speed isn't the whole story...
for instance an intel 2700 cpu vs a 7200 cpu can have different extensions (instructions) built into the cpu...
one of those more advanced instructions are basically the ability to run a 64 bit operating system (i think its called EMT 64)
some of the extra functions involve virtulaization etc... it could all get very confusing...
it can be messy... but there are some more details here http://compare.intel.com/pcc/default.aspx?familyID=1
for future proofing i'd get 64-bit... outside of that ability i doubt anything else will matter much to you...
Awesome help... that info on the Intel processors is very interesting...some of the Duo ones have a faster clock speed than the some of the Quads!
I will definately make an informed decision... you can get a pretty good deal from Dell or others with all the options you have... no need to spend thousands
I have friends that swear by Macs, but they are not all that hyped up to be for some things
that too can be deceiving... i am impressed with the performance gains of multiple cores... remember it is not about clock speed any more....
personally i would be willing to step down in speed for multiple cores... within reason... i would not go from a 3.0 to a 1.8... maybe from a 3 to a 2.5 or something similar...
also take note of the front side bus... this is how fast your cpu talks to your memory... very relevant. faster=better blah blah blah! ![]()
the thing I would do is check out what the best setup for the OS, recording program and hardware you plan on using. Go to these manufactures forums and find out what DOESN'T work with these items and work it from there. People list their setups when their having major issues and see if more people are having the same issues with the same hardware. Check out customer reviews of those hardware and software items. Then make that big leap in buying the stuff. Then.....there's still no guaranty. LOL
Yeah, I get more useful info in the forums than anywhere else... especially here
thanks
Stay in the mix and in the know.
Latest offers, special deals and insider updates.