Skip navigation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Previous Next 4809 Views 102 Replies Latest reply: Jun 14, 2012 7:27 AM by pugdealer RSS Go to original post
  • dkemusic Just Startin' 49 posts since
    Jul 15, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    45. Apr 8, 2012 11:40 AM (in response to litesnsirens)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I agree for the electric 12 strings, but the acoustic ones sound pretty good to me.  The electric 12 strings though IMO need more help than just retuning the octave strings, with all extra DSP power of the JTV's I was really expecting better for the 12 string models.  Personally I don't want to use Workbench to adjust the 12 strings, they should be done properly to begin with and considering how many have complained about them I'm surprised they didn't adjust them for v1.8.

     

    Dan

  • jdenkevitz Just Startin' 127 posts since
    Jan 30, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    46. Apr 8, 2012 11:57 AM (in response to dkemusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    The problem probably isnt lack of DSP. Rolands COSM 12 string emulations are much more 'warble free' than even the current JTV firmware, and their vg99 came out in 2007. I prefer line 6's modeling tones more, but only recently have the variax (JTV) caught up to Roland in terms of alternate tuning performance.

  • jdenkevitz Just Startin' 127 posts since
    Jan 30, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    47. Apr 8, 2012 12:12 PM (in response to litesnsirens)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Boom was not really an issue for me before. The tone knob was effective for me in tweaking the old dread model sufficiently, and I would use a combination of an eq and tube compressor in the HD500 for most patches. Body is one thing, a distant sound is another. A roomy sound is fine for solo fingerpicking guitar or strumming when you dont need to be outfront in a mix, but its now too distant to cut through for other uses. Its a matter of just hampering usefulness. You can have 'body' without it sounding like the virtual microphone is farther away from the soundhole. I think that the new models are very good for certain uses (rhythmic strumming, solo guitar fingerstyle) but I would really like the option to also have the old models loaded in as well. Right now ive done a rollback, which means I cant use any of the other new control functions (not the end of the world, but I dont want to forever be locked out of future updates either).

  • simbo Just Startin' 78 posts since
    Jul 12, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    48. Apr 8, 2012 12:17 PM (in response to rootmusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    HI Guys, Sorry to but in but has any one got an answer .

    I have the jtv69 and updated it to 1.8, Is it the case that

    the tone control is more subtle with the acoustic guitars 

    than the rest of the models as I find the tone control has 

    very little effect with nearly all the acoustic model guitars

    is this normal.

  • dkemusic Just Startin' 49 posts since
    Jul 15, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    49. Apr 8, 2012 12:40 PM (in response to jdenkevitz)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I haven't done any recording yet with v1.8 acoustics, but I do kind of wonder if some of the models are going to sound small in a mix for lack of a better word.  With the previous models you could always roll off bottom end and notch boominess out, but you can't put back what isn't there to begin with in the case of the new models.  I do still think they sound much more realistic though than the previous models, just that they sound like they've already been eq'd to the point it may be difficult to get them to stand out in a mix. 

     

    Guess just have to wait and see how they sound when I start recording and mixing.

     

    Dan

  • dkemusic Just Startin' 49 posts since
    Jul 15, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    50. Apr 8, 2012 12:41 PM (in response to simbo)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Simbo, the tone knob when using the acoustic models is more a mic' poistion knob than a tone knob.

     

    Dan

  • simbo Just Startin' 78 posts since
    Jul 12, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    51. Apr 8, 2012 12:49 PM (in response to dkemusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Thanks Dan , was thinking there might be something wrong 

    with the guitar as Iv just got it. That's a relief. Thanks again Dan

    I will sleep tonight.

  • jdenkevitz Just Startin' 127 posts since
    Jan 30, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    52. Apr 8, 2012 9:19 PM (in response to dkemusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    dkemusic wrote:

     

    I haven't done any recording yet with v1.8 acoustics, but I do kind of wonder if some of the models are going to sound small in a mix for lack of a better word.  With the previous models you could always roll off bottom end and notch boominess out, but you can't put back what isn't there to begin with in the case of the new models.  I do still think they sound much more realistic though than the previous models, just that they sound like they've already been eq'd to the point it may be difficult to get them to stand out in a mix. 

     

    Guess just have to wait and see how they sound when I start recording and mixing.

     

    Dan

     

    Ive already found this to be the case. More realistic solo, but much more difficult to get them to stand out/cut through in a mix. Its a basic precept of recording. Its why you dont ever record delay/reverb directly to your guitar track, as you cant later remove it. The same principle applies here. While subtle, its definitely there. Its even more pronounced when playing in a live room which has its own natural ambience/reverb.

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    53. Apr 9, 2012 8:28 AM (in response to dkemusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I hear you but who's to say what the right overall setting is for the 12 string models.  They probably set it up a little over the top so that if someone picks up a guitar in the store and tries the 12 strings it will jump out at them.  It does take a little mucking around before you realize that it's a bit much for actual play.  I would imagine that we would all set it up slightly differently to meet our needs and tastes and some people may even like it as is.  We're all different.  Heck some people even like the 1.71 acoustic models better over all so anything is possible.  I know it's a pain to go into workbench and muck around but I'm glad the option is there.  I spent about 10 minutes on it last night and got both the Guild and the D28 12 string models sounding just the way I like them.

  • fstaunton Just Startin' 80 posts since
    Mar 3, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    54. Apr 9, 2012 10:20 AM (in response to litesnsirens)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Litesnsirens, I've not used workbench yet.  Would you share briefly what types of tweaks you've made to the 12 string models to suit your hear?

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    55. Apr 9, 2012 9:22 AM (in response to fstaunton)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Sure... I'll hook everything back up later today and put my settings on here. As with all the acoustic models, I'm looking for something that I can pick or strum and it still sounds good.  I've been spending a fair bit of time with the HD500 to try to get some settings that will do that for me but even when I got it for the 6 string models the 12 string models needed to be tamed a bit.  I find they were just detuned a little to much which is OK for picking but just out of control for strumming.

  • Hornypope Just Startin' 5 posts since
    Mar 23, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    56. Apr 14, 2012 8:00 AM (in response to jdenkevitz)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Hi!

     

    I just read your postings and must say that I have the same problem with the new update.

    IMO all postings here are missing one important point: the Variax was primarily designed to help us working musicians to play live gigs and only bring one guitar and be able to change the guitars/amps/sounds faster and easier. Lets be honest - in a studio I'm not using my Variax to record acoustic guitar, I record a real acoustic guitar! Maybe some special tunings like baritone or something like that, yes, the electric models, yes, yes, even the Resos (I usually just need a lick or two but for that I'm not buying a Dobro or a Sitar...;-)), but not the plain acoustic! It will never sound the same... But playing live the Variax is a bless! And there's my problem which is the same as you mentioned: I made some new acoustics patches to use them live and they sounded good at home (monitors, headphones and even on my PA). Then I went to a Duet-gig, where we use some backing tracks and my acoustics were just "not in the band" if you know what I mean. They were in an other space and I think that this "roomyness" that you're talking about is the problem. The old models maybe don't sound better on their own but they sound 100% better in the mix or live in a band.

    That's why I also think the best way would be that the Line6 makes possible to download and integrate the old acoustics in a setup - if somebody like them better he should be able to use them - without losing the new features. Or they should try to get rid of the roomyness on the new acoustics and bring a bit more "Air" into them - I also miss that if I'm strumming all of them - that would be the best...

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    57. Apr 14, 2012 10:52 AM (in response to simbo)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Hey Guys, I just wanted to report back a bit of a finding on here.  A lot of us tend to put our input sources on "Same" when using JTV with an HD500.  Most of my patches were defaulted like that.  I decided to try for the acoustic to setting it to "Mic" or "Aux" anything so that the input source isn't getting doubled up.  It cuts the volume a bit because the input source isn't double but it sure tames the sound down for me it was night and day.  I thought the acoustic models sounded good, old or new this is a huge improvement.  If you haven't bothered to notice or check it's worth a shot. 

  • Icewind Just Startin' 230 posts since
    Jul 7, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    58. Apr 14, 2012 7:14 PM (in response to litesnsirens)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Thanks!  That does make a difference.  On some patches, though, doing this makes sound only come out of the left channel.  I can't figure out why...

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    59. Apr 14, 2012 8:19 PM (in response to Icewind)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Well there's a number of possibilities, but that's the HD500 for you :)

    If you arent running in stereo, simply go to the mixer on those patches and pan both sides to centre.

    If you are running stereo, it'll be harder for me to figure out without seeing the signal path. 

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)