Apr 10, 2012 12:49 AM
Neal aka: MerlinFL - Forum for all products in the Dream Rig.
-
Like (0)
Most postings here are copied from other threads with many questions, answers, and suggestions posed by me to those seeking assistance. I created this thread in the hopes that perhaps in digging through the various topics covered here many users of various gear might find answers, or better yet – ideas on how best to work with the Line 6 gear they have or were thinking of purchasing. I try to at least show where the post I copied came from in case anyone wants to go to that specific thread for more information.
I've got several posts and replies to start with. I'll post them ASAP and get this show on the road.
This is copied from two posts regarding the use of the JTV 1.80 acoustic guitar models with or without POD HD units.
I strongly suggest using the PhD Motorway amp in full mode with the default 212 speaker cab. If you do choose this option within one of the Line 6 pre-made Acoustic patches with several EQs being used. Please delete the first two EQs in the signal chain and then put the PhD amp & cab in front of all other EQs. Some of the FX may be better moved in front of the amp, but all EQs will work best after the amp & cab. You might even find you could delete more than two depending on your personal taste or need for those blocks for other FX that will work under the DSP limit.
Here a copy of a post from a question I believe is relevant to this discussion regarding acoustic guitar models and how (in my opinion and personal trials) to get the most from the new 1.80 JTV update as well as using it with any of the POD HD products..............
I understand you point of view perfectly as an Ovation acoustic guitar user. But since I started in with the original Variax guitars with the electric model 700, I’ve not brought my Ovations to another gig as I could get any acoustic sound I wanted with those guitars, and now the much improved JTV acoustic models. Before update 1.80., I never had much problem dialing in a gorgeous tone with nothing more than one EQ used as a High pass filter and another for tweaking the mids thru highs of the guitar models. I've read hundreds of posts talking about what players don't like about the various Variax modeled guitars. I guess I've been a very lucky (or more experienced working with tone and all the controls Line 6 has always offered starting with my Vetta combo) person that I've not had most of the problems that I could not control or adjust as others seem to have had.
I also agree with the previous post that the sound many are reporting as "ambience" is not ambience, but what this previous poster wrote...the acoustic "box" or body of the guitar modeled. I can only presume that line 6 was trying their best to capture the full tonal spectrum that an acoustic guitar made as the ones Line 6 chose to model are made and how they reproduce the string vibrations internally as well as what the combination of initial string sound, plus the subsequent harmonics and overtones, plus the size of the wooden body equal out to be. It might sound like playing an acoustic guitar recorded in a bathroom, but I'm not certain that is what was done or intended. Enough of the audio physics lesson
I play in a rock band, and I've been using Line 6 guitars and their acoustic models since I got my original Line 6 guitar back in 2006. I've never had any problem cutting through the rest of the band with keys and/or other electric guitars and acoustic drums playing from day one. I've not made "crazy" EQ settings to compensate or played at twice the volume, I've just gotten excellent acoustic sounds and let them "speak" for themselves in the band environment. I wish I could go to each Line 6 owners home and set up guitar patches that will work perfectly in their specific live performances, but this is not possible. I will suggest the following...
I've never previously written out any of my basic formulas, but I think it time to share some of my findings with the Line 6 community. Hopefully my settings will help in two main ways...1) to let you hear what you can get from the gear you have and the updates Line 6 has made to produce the tone at reasonable volume levels to be very usable. 2) To get people pointed to the right directions with this new gear and the new capabilities. And if JTV owners do not have any POD HD gear, all this can be done with an EQ of good sonic quality and proper EQ settings on an amp or mixing console.
All the best,
Neal
PS - if you have any results to share after trying my suggestions good or bad, please post them. I can't get better at helping others if I don't know what I suggest is being tried and what the results for others turn out to be.
7. Apr 9, 2012 10:42 PM (in response to Neal Van)
Re: Some more thoughts on the 1.81 Firmware update...
FRFR is full range flat response. Maybe a bit of a misnomer at times since it's probably a goal to have flat response on a lot of speaker systems but probably not always achieved. At any rate more of a PA type speaker than a guitar cab. Which is probably better for acoustic guitar. I don't have the full dream rig only the HD500 and JTV69. I doubt I will go back to real amps any time soon I got rid of my Boogie Mark V last June in favour of a second Bose L1. HD500 into the Bose is my dream rig, no need for volume wars it dispersed sound so evenly and at over 7 feet tall the sound isn't shooting past my knees.
Hence the reason that I don't use a cab sim on my acoustic tones. I can go from a nice amp tone to acoustic straight to PA tone and the mix to me is always consistently coming from the same place. I will say that DT25 makes me want to get one just cuz... but it would be pretty hard to justify. I have messed with the DT50 and DT25 in the stores without an HD500 in front and I think they are killer amps at half the price of a Mark V they cover a ton of tonal ground. I kind of wish I had one just to try out your patches. You're one of the guys I look to on here for sound Line 6 guidance.
32. Apr 10, 2012 12:38 AM (in response to Neal Van)
Re: Some more thoughts on the 1.81 Firmware update...
I don't yet have an HD500, I still have my X3L, and I go through an Eminence Tonker 12" guitar speaker in a small floor monitor wedge, and a class D Crate Power Block 150 Watt amp. I bypass the preamp section and connect in through the fx loop return at line level. The thing gives a very good electric gutiar vibe, but I have struggled with the acoustic models of the Variax. Like I said -- they're ok, not OK...
Thanks Neal -- I'll try your suggestions with the EQ settings in my X3L. Of course, I don't have the cabinet DEP settings, though on the X3L. I am on the cusp of picking up an HD500 (again). I tried one last fall, but it was flakey -- kept going into a non-responsive mode with a blank screen when I would try to go into the global settings. I couldn't get past that, so I took it back to Guitar Center and passed on it.
I was very disappointed that the XLR and 1/4" outputs could not be set to be indepently controlled like the X3L. I send a signal to the soundman through the XLR, and use the 1/4" out for the stage mix. I can vary my stage volume with the master volume on the pedal without screwing up his mix. Going in through the FX return also bypasses the volume control on the amp, so that's not an option. I was hoping an HD500 firmware update would address this, but so far hasn't. There have been many requests for it, but no response so far. When the HD500 I tried was working, I pretty much liked what I heard, but needed to get at the global settings and couldn't. I was so frustrated at that point, I was in no mood to try another unit.
I also tried an FRFR Carvin PM12A self powered speaker around last Thanksgiving, but sent it back, as it did better with the acoustic models, but bit it as far as I was concerned for the electrics. The "600" watt amp should have blown me off the stage, but couldn't get it up to stage volume as a floor monitor to the level of the PB150 without it compressing the crap out of the signal -- took all of the IR out of the electric models and sounded "brittle" to me....
I'm trying to keep my rig light,as the soundman does the FOH. I have a silverface Twin Reverb in a flight case that weighs in at about 150 lbs with the JBL E-120's I had it fitted with in the 80's, but tired of lugging that heavy stuff around when a small rig and a soundman can get it out there better anyway. I'm at the point of going with the HD500 in the near future. Gonna give it another go, soon....
Dave
Copied from Re: Some more thoughts on the 1.81 Firmware update...
litesnsirens wrote:
FRFR is full range flat response. Maybe a bit of a misnomer at times since it's probably a goal to have flat response on a lot of speaker systems but probably not always achieved. At any rate more of a PA type speaker than a guitar cab. Which is probably better for acoustic guitar. I don't have the full dream rig only the HD500 and JTV69. I doubt I will go back to real amps any time soon I got rid of my Boogie Mark V last June in favour of a second Bose L1. HD500 into the Bose is my dream rig, no need for volume wars it dispersed sound so evenly and at over 7 feet tall the sound isn't shooting past my knees.
Hence the reason that I don't use a cab sim on my acoustic tones. I can go from a nice amp tone to acoustic straight to PA tone and the mix to me is always consistently coming from the same place. I will say that DT25 makes me want to get one just cuz... but it would be pretty hard to justify. I have messed with the DT50 and DT25 in the stores without an HD500 in front and I think they are killer amps at half the price of a Mark V they cover a ton of tonal ground. I kind of wish I had one just to try out your patches. You're one of the guys I look to on here for sound Line 6 guidance.
My response…
Wow! - Thank you so much for that very kind compliment. I'm humbled and very flattered. Sounds corny, I'll bet, but I'm very sincere and passionate about music and all the physical components that go into the creation of it. Sometimes my passions get the better of me in a negative way, but I'm only human and hope you've not seen too many angry bits from me ranting about one thing or another. I just want to help get the most out of Line 6 gear I'm familiar with and use everyday on this thread is my reason for being here.
Getting back on track with the topic. I'm slightly familiar with your Bose L1 system and understand the principles behind it's conception and functionality. However, I honestly do suggest that you try my PhD Motorway Full amp 212 default Cabinet version with the settings I suggested for acoustic guitar models or any other clean or distorted models that require more emphasis without being louder. More articulation with being too harsh on the ears.
I do not know more than the specs I've read and the demos I've watched and listened to to help with your Bose L1, but the physics of soundwaves are the same no matter what you use and the principles will always apply. Now getting them to work for you instead of against you- that is the tricky part. Do you use a subwoofer with your personal L1, or not? If not, perhaps if trying my approach, use my settings for the low mid and low Q about 1db or 2db less and the same amount for the hi mid and highs except less by the same db amount. I don't know enough of the overall frequency response of your system and I'm guessing it is more "flat" than other typical enclosures which would require less tweaking on both sides of my equation.
Please let me know if you try my formula and how your Bose L1 system responds. I'd love to read your findings and how a nearly 100% flat time aligned system responds to these POD HD500 parameters. And also - what was the response depending on the room (lively/kinda dead/high ceiling/etc.) you used it in?
Thanks again for your kind words. It was a treat for me to read them, and they are especially significant to me at this point in time.
Take care,
Neal
34. Apr 10, 2012 1:49 AM (in response to Neal Van)
Copied from post...Can the DT amp do L6 link and xlr outputs at the same time?
ChristianArnold wrote:
I figure this is probably a no but I figured I would ask. I'm 2/3 of the way to the dream rig and my only real thing holding me back is the fact that you cant do 2 different output modes from the HD500 like you can (from what I have read on forums) on the X3live. I want to be able to do all my regular tones into the DT25 and then more acoustic stuff into the PA. If this is not possible, what have you guys done in order to acomplish this task?
Hi Christian - you can do the same thing from either, but it depends on how you want you stage sound to work. You can send independent audio signals from the POD HD500 to your DT25 & the FOH PA Mixer with independent volume control. It may not be the "ideal" Line 6 solution, but it will work if you wish to try. You use your XLR out to the PA, then instead of using the L6 link to your DT25; you go from 1/4" amp level out (switch on HD500) to the 1/4" input of the DT25. Use the MIDI channels to access the DT25 topology and other front panel settings.
Another solution, but this requires you to have all your patch levels worked out with your PA situation in mind during your performances. I you choose this option, then you L6 link your HD500 or X3L to the DT25, then use the DT25 XLR out to the FOH PA. Your acoustic patches would be made with out an "amp" although your DT25 will still be producing your sounds on stage. however, with patches set up properly, you can send your no amp acoustic patch signal directly through the DT25 without any corruption by the amp or any settings on the amp as the XLR out will only reproduce what you "tell" the DT25 to do. The DT25 will "have to" produce a clean near perfect acoustic tone if you build a patch that is the exact sound you want coming from the PA. You'll not hear the ultra highs and sibilance that a tweeter or horn produces, but you're on stage and it's what the audience hears that matters more, right?
Two simple solutions to getting your current X3L or future HD500 units as well as your DT25 amp and JTV guitar to work for you instead of against you. I hope you might try one or both of these set-ups and let me know what you think. Good or bad, I can't learn how other players situations are helped or hurt by my suggestions if no one writes back what they thought of my suggestions. I know what works for me, but it's you that my suggestions need to help.
Take care,
Neal
35. Apr 10, 2012 2:49 AM (in response to Neal Van)
Copied from this post...
No matter how I try , the DT25 sounds so much better without the HD 500 - please help Line 6!
created by scotty_burford in Line 6 Dream Rig - View the full discussion
I have read any and every article and post I can find on getting these two working together. I have similar questions before. The DT-25 sounds fantastic by itself but when I choose to incorporate the POD HD500 via Line6 link it get very noisy and the articial overtones really become obvious.
Right now I have set up a patch on Channel B that sounds fantastic with my G&L Tele. Choosing the same pre in the POD ( I believe it is the Blackface Dbl Vib pre) and setting it exactly the same as Channel B produces something similar but with a lot of awful overtones that suddenly take it back to sounding like it is coming out of POD Farm or the like. For want of a better term, the digital brittleness is very evident when the OD pre is employed. And a lot of noise suddenly appears in the signal as well.
I am using a quality DMX cable and leads, various guitars with both single-coil and humbucking pickups...all the same results.
I really appreciate the input from those who volunteer their time to answer such questions, but would someone from Line 6 please answer this for me. I need to know how to get these two working together as it is claimed they can. I have had much better results using the BOSS GT-8 into the DT-25 than with anything I have achieved with the POD HD 500. I would even be happy to pay a Line 6 demonstrator for their time so they can show me to achieve the seamless results that are promised between the two units.
Thanks for your time
Hi Scotty - I read you [post and understand exactly what you are describing. I think I might know where your problem lies, but before I go typing a bunch of things to check or configure...how about you try two simple things for me first and post your results and we can go from there?
Now that is one way - here is the other...
If you still do have problems, I'd suggest a return to place of purchase, or perhaps ask for a repair ticket directly from Line 6. with your test results included to either place.
Also - if it's not too much trouble, please post here what your testing results were so I and everyone else reading this can learn a bit more about all this gear and how it works together.
Best of luck and take care,
Neal
36. Apr 10, 2012 2:50 AM (in response to Neal Van)
Copied from a post complaining about the DSP Over Limit message.....
Re: DSP Upgrade for HD. Is it possible?
I know, I know it wouldn't be anything near as easy as shopping for RAM and installing it, and I don't remember any previous L6 product been offered with any DSP upgrade option, but I don't remember any previous "DSP castrated" products either...
It's just that, even loving the tones I'm getting from my HD500, I can't help but feel frustrated by the annoying "DSP limit reached" messages.
Thanks anyway.
My response…
Perhaps Line 6 is working with, paying for, or simply waiting for...better compression ratio programs to come out? I'm not sure if this is the DSP limit problem, but it could be one reason why the company chose to put more into the unit than can be used at one time.
This didn't happen previously, but does anyone really know (outside of the developers) just how much DSP processing those 80 amps & cabs, plus ?? amount of FX or anything other bells and whistles there were put into all prior units like the Vetta?
All I know is that the Vetta was produced somewhere around 2002, and the technology available had to have been much less than 2002 tech because the engineers can only work with what is available at the time of development.
Based on publicly posted interviews on YouTube and other websites...Line 6 people were discussing the engineering process and when it first went onto a draft board. That was stated as 2007 - does anyone remember what tech and DSP power was available in 2007? Perhaps this is one part of the answer? Perhaps the company chose to put more available then could ever be used at the same time on the processor these POD HD units have because they wanted to give better sonic choices instead of worrying about DSP limit messages?
In other words - if Line 6 chose to "skimp" on anything or use less powerful algorithms that would never cause the DSP OVER LIMIT message to happen, would anyone be complaining?
Just a thought,
Neal
A tutorial I posted in response to someone asking how to control the four topologies with a POD HD500 via the L6 Link connection.
I suggest the following to get the results you are looking for...
Lastly - you need to do the following to get the utmost from the DT25 amp you have...
To access Channel B you must do the following for all four of your A-D Amp patches.
I hope this small instruction guide helps you discover what your gear is capable of doing.
Take care and best of luck,
Neal
PS - if you like this guide and it does help you get what you're looking for. I'd appreciate it if you posted how this worked for you. I can't learn more unless others write back and let me know how my suggestions or instructions worked for them. Thanks.
Addendum:
I only made the choices I suggested based on the ease of use working with those amps getting a wide variety of tonal options.
I do agree that the Vox 30TB or the Vox 15 are also terrific choices for Topology III if you want less input gain choices and stick within that British invasion scope of sounds.
I am not suggesting that my amp choices for each topology are the only ones. There are many that use Mode I, and Mode III. Marshalls pretty much cover Mode II but are not the only choice in this mode. And Mode IV seems to be only used by the ENGL Fireball model. I think if Line 6 had more than just the Dual Rect Mesa verson, you would probably see mode IV with other Mesa models.
Okay - here is a complete list of what modes switch when using the default amp models...
Mode I
Mode II
Mode III
Mode IV
This is the complete list of every model amp on the latest upgrade 2.02 for the POD HD units. All topologies listed are the ones that come up before any user adjustments or changes. All amps are Pentode-Class A/B unless listed otherwise.
I hope this clears up any possible confusion to my amp suggestion in my tutorial. The amp choices are 100% at the users discretion.
Marshall History - the original JTM-45.... (artical taken from Wikipedia)
Jim Marshall thought he could produce a cheaper alternative to American-made guitar amplifiers, but he had limited experience as an electrical engineer. He enlisted the help of his shop repairman Ken Bran and an EMI technician named Dudley Craven, and between them they decided they most liked the sound of the 4x10" Fender Bassman. They made several prototypes using the Fender Bassman amp as a model. The sixth prototype produced, in Jim's words, the "Marshall Sound".[3]
The first few production units almost copied the Bassman circuit, with American military surplus 5881 power valves, a relative of the 6L6. Speakers were then rarely able to handle more than 15 watts, which meant that an amplifier approaching 50 watts had to use four speakers. For their Bassman, Fender used four Jensen speakers in the same cabinet as the amplifier, but Marshall chose to separate the amplifier from the speakers, and placed four 12-inch Celestion speakers in a separate closed-back cabinet instead of the four 10-inch Jensens in an open-back combo. Other crucial differences were the use of higher-gain ECC83 valves throughout the preamp, and the introduction of a capacitor/resistor filter after the volume control. These circuit changes gave the amp more gain so that it broke into overdrive sooner on the volume control than the Bassman, and boosted the treble frequencies. This new amplifier, tentatively called the "Mark II", was eventually named the "JTM 45," after Jim and his son Terry Marshall and the max. wattage of the amplifier. Note: the actual wattage of the JTM-45 is 30 watts.[4]
Stay in the mix and in the know.
Latest offers, special deals and insider updates.