Skip navigation
1840 Views 19 Replies Latest reply: Dec 29, 2012 3:06 PM by tinman1 RSS
LewisBrunton Just Startin' 42 posts since
Jul 5, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Apr 11, 2012 11:48 PM

Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

Hi all,

 

having read through the manuals and the various discussions on line I understand that when using the Pod HD 500 with the DT25 via the Line6 link that I should select the preamp and not the full amp models on the HD500. It makes sense as the DT25 is providing the appropriate power amp stage. It also makes sense when you put the amp into LVM mode as the DT25 then provides the appropriate power amp stage through modelling rather than the valves as they are not being driven enough.

 

But...... having looked at the patches provided by Line 6 on the recent POD HD 500 updates that are specifically for the DT series of amps I find that they have provided two sets of patches, one for normal usage and a repeated set that are modified for LVM mode - but the LVM ones use the full amp models!?!?!

 

So that is basically saying that you are using the full amp from the Pod, then adding another modelled amp stage on the DT25?!? Are Line 6 suggesting that the modelled power amp in LVM mode doesn't cut it, or am I missing something.

 

At the end of the day I know that it doesn't matter what settings we use as long as we like the sound, but in an effort to try and get the most authentic sound we follow the guide and if those that write the guide can't make their mind up about what is authentic what do we do?

 

Any thoughts?

 

Lewis

  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 12, 2012 12:22 AM (in response to LewisBrunton)
    Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

    Low volume mode on DT's "bypasses" tubes and models their influence by power amp modelling in DT to use DT when you can't turn it loud. So if you use DT25 in LVM full models ond HD500 should sound better - with only pre models you don't have the tubes (their modelling) in you chain.

      • Currently Being Moderated
        Apr 12, 2012 12:57 AM (in response to LewisBrunton)
        Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

        I'm not sure if DT25 modelled poweramp isn't bypassed when using signal from L6 link and if signal from HD500 doesn't go straight in front of tubes in DT25 and tubes are not so much used in LVM. But I'm not sure of it...

              • Pezza Just Startin' 75 posts since
                Jun 18, 2007
                Currently Being Moderated
                Apr 12, 2012 6:37 AM (in response to LewisBrunton)
                Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                I've just seen this thread and I'd definitely like to hear Line 6's response on this. Like you, I understood that LVM used modelled DT poweramp whether in standalone OR L6 link POD HD mode. It does make sense that this isn't the case and when using a POD HD via L6 link you need to use full models. It's puzzled me why the POD HDs pre models sound so weak in LVM.

                 

                Does this mean that LVM is little more than 'half power' mode when using L6 link?

                  • aeugle Just Startin' 111 posts since
                    Sep 5, 2008
                    Currently Being Moderated
                    Apr 13, 2012 6:15 AM (in response to LewisBrunton)
                    Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                    Hello Lewis,

                     

                    do you use cab sim and mic sim?

                    Yes or no.

                    Do you use studio/direct, combo power amp or stack power amp out?

                     

                    Best regards

                    Thomas

                      • hollis1003 Iknowathingortwo 342 posts since
                        Feb 6, 2007
                        Currently Being Moderated
                        Apr 13, 2012 12:09 PM (in response to LewisBrunton)
                        Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                        So here's what I have gathered.  When using LMV on the DT you are only changing the pre-amps internal to the DT to a full or pre-amp model.

                         

                        Choosing LVM when the L6 link and a POD HD does not activate any kind of power amp simulation in the DT since you are bypassing the amp simulation in the DT.

                         

                        If you think about how it works it really makes sense.  I have no documentation to prove it, but since Line 6 seems to recommend using full amp models on the POD HD when in LVM it does make sense.  The POD HDs don't offer any kind of separate power amp modelling.  It's much easier for the DT to have the full and pre versions of the models.

                         

                        Here is the only deffinition I could find for what they call "Low Power Mode":

                        What’s low-power mode?

                        Perfect for recording or quieter gigs, low-power mode lets the HD modeling technology provide both preamp and power amp tones. You can perform with all the grit and gain you need without the volume that normally comes with it.

                         

                        It does seem that with the DT-25 you are not using tubes in LVM since you can use the direct out and not have a speaker connected but there is never any indication that there is a separate solid state power amp that takes over in LVM.

                        Hope this helps clear some things up for people.

                            • Pezza Just Startin' 75 posts since
                              Jun 18, 2007
                              Currently Being Moderated
                              Apr 16, 2012 3:26 AM (in response to LewisBrunton)
                              Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                              Lewis

                               

                              I thought I'd come back to this thread as it's most relevant!

                               

                              As regards whether or not the DT amp has more than 4 power amp models (for LVM); I did think that was the case, but I'm beginning to think that the DT (in LVM) just contains and uses (in standalone mode) the same 4 full amp models as the POD HD (ie AC30TB, Tread etc) and so the reason it doesn't use them with POD/L6 link is that it's best to use whichever full amp is on the POD, rather than POD pre into one of 4 'generic' DT power amps (which may or may not exist). (It may also be to do with the position of POD fx etc after the pre, but maybe L6 link can do that anyway).

                               

                              This makes me also query how the DT configures itself in full power mode. Does it simply select voicing/class/pentode or triode or are there other configurations relating to the POD HD models? This quote from the L6 link conectivity guide makes me think the DT configures other stuff behind the scenes:

                               

                              "The Super O, Twed B-man, A-15 and Brit Plexi J-45 share an aspect (their analog B+ voltage) that differs from the other POD HD Amp Models, which can also be a source of disruption. To minimize this disruption, limit the cases where you switch between one of these Amp Models and one of the other POD Amp models."

                               

                              It would be nice if Line 6 would make things a bit clearer here.

                  • tinman1 Just Startin' 26 posts since
                    Jun 1, 2011
                    Currently Being Moderated
                    Aug 12, 2012 12:51 PM (in response to LewisBrunton)
                    Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                    I have to disagree.

                     

                    I think that there must be an element of poweramp modelling from the DT in LVM even with a pod HD unit connected via L6 Link. My PRE patches (HD300) all sound much better in LVM than they do if I retain the same settings but switch the patch to FULL on pod. Really, when I switch the patches to FULL they sound awful, completely unusable- thin, buzzy and electronic.

                     

                    Clearly there is a tonal difference in LVM with or without the pod HD connected. If there wasn't there would be no point in paying extra for a tube amp like the DT25, we'd all be better off hooking a pod directly to some speakers. Some of the tonal difference we hear will be related to a difference in volume alone. Plus, the bonus is that I only require one set of (PRE) patches and don't have to maintain a FULL set as well.

                     

                    I've heard some experts in other discussions say that the DT "powers down" to 12 watts in LVM but still uses the poweramp tubes to drive the speaker. This would go along with my assertion that my patches still sound better in PRE mode. However the tubes are bypassed completely if using the XLR external out with the amp in standby- this would affect your tone for recording by that method.

                     

                    Certainly, at present, I'm happy to use the tone I acheive in LVM rather than opt for an expensive attenuator.

                    • tinman1 Just Startin' 26 posts since
                      Jun 1, 2011
                      Currently Being Moderated
                      Dec 29, 2012 3:06 PM (in response to tinman1)
                      Re: Confused - DT25 and Pod HD 500 patches

                      Actually no longer sure I'm right here. I've been using FULL patches much more often- direct to headphones from the HD300 with dt25 switched off. This is mainly due to neighbours complaining about the amps volume! I'm getting some really phenomenal tones now from the HD unit itself, takes a bit of tweaking and the factory presets arent great but the fender amps in particular are awesome with some excellent blues rock sounds (will post to custom tone soon).

                       

                      I'm actually finding that playing through the amp via line 6 with the amp in full power mode, the patches sound better in FULL rather than preamp mode! I guess it's because I can't crank the amp loud enough to get enough power amp tube distortion (I guess I'd need the amp volume to match the FULL patch which is usually too loud). Plus I'm probably getting too used to the fully modelled tones through headphones.

                       

                      I'd previously been using PRE patches in LVM but I assume that my newer, better attempts at FULL patches will now also sound better in LVM. So I stand corrected!

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (2)

Legend

  • Correct Answers - 5 points
  • Helpful Answers - 3 points