Skip navigation
1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Previous Next 4809 Views 102 Replies Latest reply: Jun 14, 2012 7:27 AM by pugdealer RSS Go to original post
  • rootmusic Just Startin' 45 posts since
    Sep 5, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    60. Apr 15, 2012 6:56 AM (in response to ChristianArnold)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Used the new sounds live last night for the first time. New acoustic sounds stand out beautifully against the band (Twin guitar,bass, drums line up)

    We play Pinball wizard, Make me smile etc

     

    I use X3 live straight into stereo DB speakers

  • pugdealer Just Startin' 71 posts since
    Nov 2, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    61. Apr 17, 2012 1:23 PM (in response to rootmusic)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I updated to 1.81 recently, having already read the "complaints" about the "roomynes" of the acoustics, and unfortunately it didn't work for me! I use the JTV to play live, and I bought it 50% for the tele's, strato's, les paul's and the other 50% for the acoustics, which I need/like to sound as true as possible!

     

    I used a Fender Telecaste Acoustasonic before which had decent acoustic sounds, then I bought the JTV and after some tweaking (comp and EQ), I got the JTV to sound much better than the fender, but when I updated to 1.81, I found the acoustics completely unusable because of the roomyness! I fiddled with the tone knob, EQ, etc, but couldn't get it to sound anywhere near what I like/need in any situation...home, studio recording, live! I did a check-sound before this past saturday gig, and it was just terrible...couldn't get it to sound right, so I had to rush back home and rollback to 1.71

     

    It just doesn't make any sense to me the exagerated roomyness!! I mean, that's something you add/tweak on the pod hd500 (which I use) depending on what you're looking for, but it just shouldn't be like that when playing straight out of the guitar!!!

     

    I didn't use any of the new patches oh the HD500, didn't even bother since it didn't even sound right straight out...

  • rootmusic Just Startin' 45 posts since
    Sep 5, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    62. Apr 17, 2012 1:38 PM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    It must be a personal preference thing, maybe. I used the old version live many times and it sounded good but Zingy. I changed nothing on my X3 patches and the new sounds slotted straight into the band, but sounded more real.

     

    I was noodling at the end of the soundcheck and played a few bars of Extreme's More than Words and someone in the audience actually came up after and said they thought we had put the CD on because they were disappointed when the whole song didn't appear.

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    63. Apr 17, 2012 1:58 PM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Well, I don't buy the roominess complaint, the new models sound like acoustic guitars complete with the boxy body sound of the guitar and thankfully the boomyness of the old models is gone.  But I will say this,

    1) the patches that you had with the previous models definitely will not work with the new models, you have to rebuild your patches completely. 

     

    2) As I stated above, if you have your HD500 set up with Input 1 on Variax and Input 2 on "same" or "variax" or even a multiple that inlcudes variax (what is it, GUITAR + VARIAX + AUX or something like that?) set it to something else like just "mic" or "aux".  This for me totally changed the ability to get a great acoustic sound from the variax. 

     

    With a lot of the electric models I actually prefer Input 2 set to "Same" but the acoustic models just work a lot better if you make sure the variax is only coming in on Input 1 and Input 2 is effectively muted.  I only discovered this recently so it may also work for the old models as well, but if you're willing to give the new models another try and you didn't already have your inputs set up like I just suggested for the acoustic models give it a try, it makes a huge difference.  If you already had your HD500 set up like this, then I guess you just prefer the sound of the old models which is fine, it all comes down to personal taste in the end anyway.  I'm just offering it up as something to try, I have the best acoustic sound I've ever been able to achieve now.

  • zeddd Just Startin' 385 posts since
    May 12, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    64. Apr 17, 2012 2:14 PM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Is it possible that the people who are having a problem with the "roominess" of the new models are experiencing something different than those who are not feeing that way. Has everyone watched to Christian's video which compares the old acoustic models to the new ones? Do the people who think the new models are too roomy also think the same way when listening to the new models in Christian's video?

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkHLW2cYqLM

     

    I just don't hear the roominess myself. The new ones just seem to sound better.

  • Hornypope Just Startin' 5 posts since
    Mar 23, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    66. Apr 18, 2012 3:41 AM (in response to zeddd)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I think the problem is that we're talking about two different things here: the new ones sound better or more real if you play them on their own (IMO especially single notes and fingerpicking) but if you try to put them "into a band", let's say just strumming live on stage or maybe in studio, than you get a problem with the roominess because they're somehow in their own space and you can't change that because it's already in the sound!

    So Christian's video is O.K. if you just want to know how the old and new ones sound but in a composition with other instruments or live with the band the new ones just don't blend in. It can be compared with mixing situation in studio: if you hear/solo the instruments and vocals on their own they don't usually sound good (sometimes even really bad!;-)) but in the mix they work...

    I agree that we need a completely new approach to tweak the new acoustics if we want to use them because they sure don't work with the old patches. Maybe it would be a good idea Line6 would make some basic HD500 patches for us to start from and put them on CustomTone so we wouldn't waste too much time figuring out ourselves what to do. Somehow I feel left alone with this problem (and obviously some of you, too) and this sure would help...

  • Hornypope Just Startin' 5 posts since
    Mar 23, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    67. Apr 18, 2012 3:51 AM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Hi Pugdealer!

    This is a 100% the same problem I have. I play many different styles (I have to - I'm a working musician and from time to time I have to eat something...;o)) and for me the Variax is a bless! I played a gig last Saturday and the same thing happened to me, too. I tweaked some sounds with the new acoustics at home and they sounded pretty much O.K. but as I played the soundcheck with the band I almost got a shock! The worst thing was strumming - it just didn't want to blend in! Maybe the old ones are "not as real" as the new ones but they DO blend in a song way better...

    I already wrote this in another answer below: I think Line6 should also give us some HD500 patches with this new acoustics so we can see what kind of approach to tweaking/programming were they thinking of, don't you think so?!

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    68. Apr 18, 2012 4:29 AM (in response to Hornypope)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    I'm having no problem getting the new acoustics to sound good in the mix (compared to the old models).  And that's considering that I didn't have much time to tweak new patches before my last gig.  Since then of course I have continued to tweak but I've been tweaking down in my basement through one of my Bose L1's.  I'd be happy to share the patch I've come up with but I don't trust it yet, I can't be sure that I haven't eq'd the sound to my room.  I had to use a couple of parametric eq's, one to dial out a ring at 95hz and another to dial out it's octave at 190hz.  Until I get out and try it in some different rooms I won't know if that ring was from the models or a by product of the way I have the Bose set up in my basement.  Which brings me around to the same way of thinking with all the guys who are crying for better eq's. It would be great to have either a nice graphic eq or a parametric eq which allows you to dial in more than one frequency or both.

     

    Anyway, I have like 5 eq's on this patch, and with all that it doesn't change the sound that much compared to just using a blank patch. Just smooths it out. What I'm trying to say is that I could probably do all that with one good eq.  And of course on the other hand, I may get this new patch out into to some other rooms only to find out I don't need a bunch of those eq's. So far the patch I have come up with (in my basement) sounds good on all 5 acoustic models.  I was never able to achieve that with the old models.

     

    I'm sure a lot of it comes down to what we are playing through and where we are playing them.  Some guys are probably stuck playing through guitar amps that aren't full range which makes it really difficult to make an acoustic sound good. I also think it would be great for Line 6 to offer some new acoustic patches as starting points for the new models, maybe some designed to be played through full range systems and some designed to be played through a DT series amp which would likely translate decently to other amps as well.  And maybe even some just for recording via USB.  The reality is it's not really that much different than trying to get a real acoustic guitar to sound good in all those situations.  You can take a really nice acoustic guitar and play it and it sounds beautiful, right up until you try to stick a mic in front of it or stick a piezo pickup in it.  Even then you might get it sounding pretty decent on it's own but taming it into a mix is always a challenge.

  • Currently Being Moderated
    69. Apr 18, 2012 7:01 PM (in response to ChristianArnold)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpWUkD46qQg

     

    Line 6 has posted a video of their own covering all of the new features.

  • pugdealer Just Startin' 71 posts since
    Nov 2, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    70. Apr 19, 2012 10:20 AM (in response to Sonny1096)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    That's a very nice video but...

     

    I've just updated (again) to 1.81, in hopes I could get it to sound right, but still....hmmmmm....I can't!!!

     

    Like I said before...the old acoustics sounded nice straight out, and they would get usable with little tweaking. I used mostly the #1 Martin. The new ones sound like the mic is 3 feet away from the guitar, and the only guitar I can get to sound close to what I want is the gibson j200 with the tone knob all the way "off".

     

    I've also tried every acoustic patch on customtone and not much help came with that...I don't know what to do to get it to sound as on the videos from christian or line 6...

    HELP!!!

  • zeddd Just Startin' 385 posts since
    May 12, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    71. Apr 19, 2012 10:37 AM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    pugdealer wrote:

     

    The new ones sound like the mic is 3 feet away from the guitar, and the only guitar I can get to sound close to what I want is the gibson j200 with the tone knob all the way "off"....

     

    ......I don't know what to do to get it to sound as on the videos from christian or line 6...

    This is an important development. That's what I was fishing for yesterday. Sorry pugdealer that you are having this issue. But the fact that your guitar is not sounding like the demos in the Christian and Line 6 videos definitely indicates that what you are experiencing may be some sort of error (and perhaps this is true of the forum members who are bothered by the "roominess").

     

    So is it possible that somehow a firmware upgrade error has caused some users to experience some kind of a data delay/doubling that is resulting in something that sounds like extra roominess?

     

    Pugdealer, it might help if you could upload a sample of what your guitar sounds like.

  • pugdealer Just Startin' 71 posts since
    Nov 2, 2011
    Currently Being Moderated
    72. Apr 19, 2012 10:54 AM (in response to zeddd)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    will do tomorrow...

  • litesnsirens Iknowathingortwo 649 posts since
    Mar 20, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    73. Apr 19, 2012 12:13 PM (in response to pugdealer)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    What are you playing through ?or monitoring through?  Guitar amp? headphones? studio speakers.  I just want to know what the starting point is.

  • guitar4u Just Startin' 142 posts since
    Jan 26, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    74. Apr 19, 2012 1:15 PM (in response to Sonny1096)
    Re: New JTV acoustic models first impressions?

    Awesome video! Wow...nice

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Previous Next

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)