Skip navigation
13627 Views 89 Replies Latest reply: Jul 10, 2012 4:44 PM by jtatwood RSS
Lawless33 Just Startin' 43 posts since
Feb 3, 2007
Currently Being Moderated

Oct 27, 2010 4:01 PM

POD HD500 user looking for other praise/worship team guitarists

Hey, guys!  I've played in a couple of praise and worship teams at my church for the last 5-6 years and got my HD500 a couple of weeks ago.  I play MFX boards direct to my PC at home for jamming and also direct to PA at my church.  Just wondering if there are any other HD500 owners that I can learn from.  I'd like to see what kind of patches the rest of you use.  I also use a Fender Strat with single coils.  Really need help with constructing good patches for my settings.  We play a lot of Hillsong, Lincoln Brewster, etc. and I'm a terrible tweaker. Thanks!

 

Wes

  • arby810 Just Startin' 11 posts since
    Jun 24, 2007

    You might want to get a look at GuitarPraiseForum also...google it, and you'll find it. 

  • ZemanG2 Just Startin' 75 posts since
    Nov 23, 2006

    You are asking a lot in a way. The HD hasn't been out that long, if you want X3 help there is a ton, but right now you gotta just wait for others to get the work in. I am debating on upgrading purely for the loop!!! But even then I would have to take a ton of time to figure out how each model responded etc, lots of practice and lots of taking the sound guy out to dinner to pay for the late nights of adjusting in house volume! Best of luck, and mess around with it, you may not be the best tweaker, but you may find a tone you like

     

    zem

  • jtatwood Just Startin' 70 posts since
    Mar 18, 2006

    You can get a head start by checking out the presets. Focus on the ones that emulate The Edge's tone. AC-30, Dotted 8ths..etc. There are a couple that I made minor mods to and found really useful. That will carry you a long way with Hillsong. All the clean amps sound fantastic. Learn how to hear the difference between the amps or even google what the artist uses and try to load a set up as close as you can. Experiment with delays and reverbs. I'm really diggin the Octo reverb with that lush pad sound. I use it on The Burning Ones from Jesus Culture. It seems like Christian worship bands like their tone clean and wet. Editing truly is simple. My laptop just went down, forcing me to just use the pedal to edit.  Btw... Linclon Brewster used to make his X3 Live patches avail for download. Shouldn't be too hard to find what he had in his patches.

     

    Good Luck.... Keep rockn' for Christ!!

      • worshipviolin Just Startin' 22 posts since
        Jul 7, 2007

        Great idea.  I find that as much as I tweak at home, my sound is different through the PA at church.  So it is good to do a little tweaking at church!  I use Guitar Rig 4 Pro, and I love it.  I have had the HD500 for a couple of weeks now, and I'm still tweaking - still not satisfied enough to actually play through it during a worship service yet.  I'm trying to get the nice, warm sounds that I can easily get with GR4, but it just seems that everything seems thin starting out.  I'm getting closer though!  GR4 had so very many factory presets, and it was easy to find good ones to use as starting points for tweaking to taste.  The HD500, as you have already discovered by now, does not have many factory presets that are good for anything except deleting.  I have had better success downloading presets, trying them out, deleting 99% of them, and tweaking a few.

         

        I also play lots of Hillsong, Lincoln Brewster, Jesus Culture, etc.  I am very happy with my GR4 setup.  Once I get the HD500 sounding good I am going to use both GR4 and the HD500 together with a stereo A/B switch.  One thing that I have found to be helpful is to play through a good compressor then into the pod.  I am getting much better sustain and a much fuller sound immediately by doing this.  And then I don't need to tie up one of my effects blocks by using one of the pod's compressors all of the time.  I'm using a Mad Professor Forest Green hand built.  It is out of this world crazy good.  Like I said, it really does bring the whole HD500 to life compared to playing straight into it and using it's compressors.  I find this to be the case with GR4 too.

         

        I'm with you.  I'm hoping that Lincoln will post some good HD500 presets for the worshipping guitarists out here.  How about all of us praying REALLY hard!!!

         

        Keep on playing to the Lord!!

         

        Mark Lewis

        Worship Violinist

        www.worshipviolin.com

        • JerryDT Just Startin' 46 posts since
          Jan 8, 2009

          Hey guys, I did some digging and found an email address for Lincoln Brewster.  So I emailed last night and asked if he had any time in on an HD500 yet, and if so did he have any good live patches he would be willing to share.  A lady from his church responded today:

           

          Hi Jerry,
          I asked about this for you. He has not had any time with them yet. When he does he will post it on his website which is www.lincolnbrewster.com
          Thank you,
          Theresa

           

          So, nothing yet, but hopefully that will happen.  I have used his X3 patches a lot!

           

          jt

    • Quick2Listen Just Startin' 2 posts since
      Sep 15, 2011

      Moved from bass to guitar, picked up the HD 500.  How do I download one patch without blowing out all the others? Last time had to restore everything from a back-up (on Saturday night!!)  Thanks

  • Chipdogg Just Startin' 12 posts since
    Mar 7, 2007

    Until Brewster posts some of his patches (I used his ones for the X3 Live all the time), you can check out the ones I've been tweaking over the past couple of weeks.  Tested a few of them out at our church straight through a PA, and they sounded spectacular!

     

    http://line6.com/customtone/profile/Chipdogg/

    • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
      Jan 28, 2007

      Chipdogg wrote:

       

      Until Brewster posts some of his patches (I used his ones for the X3 Live all the time), you can check out the ones I've been tweaking over the past couple of weeks.  Tested a few of them out at our church straight through a PA, and they sounded spectacular!

       

      http://line6.com/customtone/profile/Chipdogg/

       

      Hey Chip - I'm digging around for EQ settings and noticed you used the same EQ model/settings on all your patches. Can you explain your approach to this EQ? I also used the LB patches on my X3 Live, but am about to go live for the first time with my HD500 and I'm struggling with the EQ settings.

      • SirChipALot Just Startin' 9 posts since
        Dec 25, 2010

        Hey Dood...not too high tech in my eq settings for each patch.  I think I started with the Strat Clean tone through a PA with the EQ on the board all set to 12 o'clock.  Once I got the Mid Focus EQ and the Plate Reverb the way I wanted it (the only two effects I keep on all the time), I just used those as templates for all my other patches.  Had to tweak a lot of the other settings for each guitar I use though; especially when I change guitars mid set and want to keep the volume normalized.  Most of the post EQ tweaking I do for each subsequent guitar/patch is on the amp knobs themselves.

         

        I've got a blackface Fender Super Reverb and a Vox AC15, and I haven't used either one live since getting the HD500.  I'm so in love with this thing...it's revolutionized everything I do each Sunday morning!

    • JerryWawak Just Startin' 119 posts since
      Dec 2, 2008

      I met Lincoln Brewster backstage in October and he was excited about the HD500 coming out, but as someone already said he was playing the Fractal AxeFx.  On his website it said he was endorsed by Fractal.  I would love to know his thoughts on the HD now that it's out and would love to know if he is using one live.

      • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
        Jan 28, 2007

        His latest YouTube video shows him playing a new Strat through an HD500 - not sure if he's using it live or not, but he's definitely playing around with one in the studio.

         

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s5j30oWagw

      • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
        Mar 13, 2007

        My open question about the HD 500, I have looked at the face of the unit and, it appears to me that the switches are labeled to accomodate the looper functions.

         

        Could someone describe how the HD navigates in comparison the the X3? In other words, is the patch switching the same unless the looper is activated? Can the looper be activated using one patch and be played over using another patch? In ohter words, if the looper is running and a person were to change patches, does the looper stop/go away?

         

        I saw Kieth and Kristin Getty at a small church here in Escondido, and the guitar player used a looper over "Hear Oh Israel/Come People of the Risen King" .....Extra cooL!

         

        I went to Guitar Center to test drive the HD 500 and there wasn't one displayed on the floor yet.

         

         

        ....Still in X3L technology, my plan is to research/shop the HD and possibly pick one up about August or so.

         

         

        While we are at it, the earlier question about live EQing, and once again this is from an X3 perspective, and what currently is working really well for me. I am not sure if EQing at the board has the same results as  EQing in the unit . As a matter of routine, I scoop the upper mids out of all of my patches and run my output (combo front) focus around 500hz. I will add also that I run a 1/4'' line to a 50 watt solid state-solid back Marshall tilted back in front of me, faced away from the congregation, and send an xlr to the board. So basically I am kind-of running 2 mixes, one for me one for the house. My understanding is that the XLR is always in the direct mode, and that the output focus doesn't tailor the XLRs, hence scooping out the upper mids in each patch.

         

        If a patch gets too dull and needs a little more "ring" to it, I will generally brighten up/add it in to the tone 2 patch, and blend accordingly.

         

         

        PTL my brothers...

  • dan5150 Just Startin' 11 posts since
    Apr 26, 2008

    Guys - unless he has something special planned, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Lincoln to post patches for an HD500.

     

    Last year, he switched from Line 6 to using an Axe-Fx from Fractal Audio.

     

    He demo'd it at the Christian Musician Summitt in Washington and seemed very happy with it.

     

    I have heard great things about that box, but honestly, he would have to have done a side by side A/B test for me to be able to tell the difference in tone. That dude sounds great no matter what he plays through. :-)

     

    -Dan-

    • arby810 Just Startin' 11 posts since
      Jun 24, 2007

      Well, I've posted this elsewhere, but I was at a CMS in Sacramento in Sept, and Lincoln was demo-ing an HD500, and did put an A/B comparison on with the AxeFX and the HD.  Used a Plexi style sound, and honestly, there was not much diff at ALL between the 2.  You're right, he could sound good playing through a Radio Shack amp, but when he did that comparison, Line 6 sold me an HD500 (a few weeks later). 

      No idea if he's gonna swap back, but I know I can't go the Fractal route, the rack and such is just too much hardware, and there is also that little problem of COST. 

      There are some decent tones being posted out there, along with some decent ones that come on the 500.  The thing is so tweakable, and I really like the sounds.  Good tone is in the ear of the beholder, (and in some cases, the eye...  "no way you're using that box for that kind of sound"...)  the ears believe, but the eyes deceive.

      So make of it what you want, but I think L6 is going to sell a lot of these rascals.  They did good.

      Hoping to see a lot more vids and tones uploaded about these boxes.

      Keep on strummin',

      God Bless all.

  • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
    Jul 1, 2007

    Heh, yeah, too bad Linc is using the Axe system now. Great in general, just too bad that his website is incorrect now. "Now YOU can have this GREAT tone for the low low price of ninety-five ninety-five ninety-five ninety-nine!"

     

     

    Anyway...patches. I won't bother posting any, since mine are all mixed for an extremely live room with some interesting characteristics. What I WILL say is definitely fiddle with dual amps. I paired up the AC15 with the Bogner Uberschall model and got fantastic results. Super smooth distortion from the hi-gain side with lots of sustain, and a ton of grit and body from the AC15 to really fill it out. You'll have to roll the bass back a bit on the Bogner and crank the drive on the AC15 to really get that texture without interfering with your bass player, but MAN is that tone huge! Throw a noise gate after the Bogner and a volume pedal at the end and you're golden. Great versatile tone.

     

    If you want a kind of "wall of sound" version, just assign a foot switch to both turn off the AC15 and turn on a short delay and/or reverb effect. That will be great for some of the bigger Hillsong titles.

     

    According to Lincoln Brewster's site, he used the Marshall Plexi Variac model on the X3 a lot. Try using a combination of the J-45, Brit P-75 and J-800 models, would be my first step.

     

    Once I really tweak some "studio" patches, I'll revise the crummy recordings I have now and post some up. All I've got now are quiet, improperly EQed samples.

  • dan5150 Just Startin' 11 posts since
    Apr 26, 2008

    Of course, as soon as I say something, I get a twitter post this week from both Linc and Line 6 talking about him being in thier studio for a photo shoot, and dialing in some patches on the HD500....

  • Jason_Kennedy Just Startin' 37 posts since
    Mar 27, 2009

    Hi,

     

    I've recently switched to using the HD500 in church after using an X3 Live for about 18 months.

     

    We play Hillsong/Tomlin/Jesus Culture/Planetshakers/Phil Wickham etc.

     

    I've attached the patch I'm mainly leaning on at the moment. I love the octo reverb, it rocks!

     

    Hope this is of some use to you. It's not perfect yet, but sounds pretty dang good in my ears on a Sunday!

     

    Jason

     

    P.S. In case you're wondering, I'm using the FX loop for a clean boost for lead breaks - I have a patch cable going from the FX Send to the Mono return.

    Attachments:
    • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
      Apr 19, 2008

      Jason,

       

      I am about to check out your patch on my HD500, but tell me a bit more about the fx loop thing you mentioned in a bit more detail (for us slow folks!)

       

      Also, check out a patch I was working with the other day at church.  I was alone, so tweaking and EQ'ing the board meant a lot of trips back and forth with a loop playing.  But my goal on this loop is to emulate my pedal board and amp setup.  I've assigned switches on the HD to somewhat match the layout of my current board, for no reason but to elimanate confusion right now because I know where everything is on my pedalboard.  Once I get more familiar with the HD, I will try to create set lists for each Sunday.  But for now, my current pedal board is giving me everything I need but it is really cumbersome and heavy to carry this stuff around twice a week.

      Here's a rundown of the board:

      Guitar (usually a tele) - EB Volume Pedal - Teese RMC4 Picture Wah - Aphex Optical Compressor - Mosferatu Overdrive - Fulltone Distortion Pro DP-1 -Fulltone SupaTrem - Boss DD-20 delay - Amp.   Board is powered by VooDoo labs Pedal Power2.  I use a Boss tuner, but it comes out of the EB VP and stays on all the time, it's not even in the signal chain for sound.   I am using a Marshall 6101 right now since we've gone to a silent stage as I can run direct out to the soundboard from the amp's pre-amp and mute the speaker.  I have also used a 76 Fender Deluxe Reverb  and a Dr. Z Maz 38 in the past, both mic'd with an Audix I5.

       

      So for the HD, I tried to get the clean sound I need, then I can turn on (or off) effects from the assigned switches.   Sometimes I layer overdrive and distortion, but mostly one or the other, depending on what we are doing.  Also, in the patch, I have two delays.  One is a dotted eighth and the other is a quarter note (which I can double tap to get eighth note delay if needed).

       

      I am going to play around with running mono next time I go, since I don't have any stereo effects, per se, and while doing so hope to work out any panning issues on the HD.


      If you play around with the patch and can refine it to give bigger and fatter tone, or improve any of the effects or sounds at all, please let me know.  Always open to improvements!

       

      Thanks!

      Attachments:
      • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
        Jul 1, 2007

        Jeff,

         

        As an aside, it is probably easier on your legs as well as any other sound guy you encounter if you utilize the EQ on the HD and mix the board flat. That was you can a) avoid running around a lot and b) have consistent sound no matter where you go so long as the host system is also EQed flat.

      • Jason_Kennedy Just Startin' 37 posts since
        Mar 27, 2009

        I certainly will check out your patch, but I cant right now as I don't have access to my HD500. I'll take a look tomorrow.

         

        The FX loop thing:

         

        Basically, take a patch cable and connect the FX loop output to the Mono/Left FX return. You can then use the FX loop (switchable via a FS assignment) to either give you a clean boost (if inserted post amp) or to give you a bit more drive and therefore break-up by putting it pre-amp.

         

        You will need to play about quite a bit with the send/return levels to get the sound right.

         

        I am still experimenting with it - I might move it pre-reverb as I'm loosing a bit of reverb where it is currently.

         

        Hope this helps!!

         

        Jason

    • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
      Apr 19, 2008

      Jason,

       

      Great patch...I am curious to see how it will sound through the pa.

      How did you get the wah and the volume on the same expression pedal?  I tried to figure that out and don't even see where the volume is in the block.  Can you guide me through that one?  I had planned on putting my existing volume pedal in front of the pod and use the wah so I didn't use another block.

      Also, another patch I did try the other day in church is called "Big Log" (recall the Robert Plant song).  However, I think it's a stereo patch.  Although I was running left and right the other day (and it sounded great) I will most likely be running mono on Sundays, so stereo patches (for now) are not feasible for me, unless there's a way to get both channels from one xlr out...say pan everything to the left???

       

      Anyway, check out the Big Log patch below....I think Nick Mattocks created it.  Sounds particularly good on a strat with the bridge and middle pick up....nice and squashy.

       

      Jeff

      Attachments:
      • Jason_Kennedy Just Startin' 37 posts since
        Mar 27, 2009

        The Volume thing is a wee trick I picked up reading these forums...

         

        You set the channel volume of the amp model to be controlled by EXP-1, with minimum value = 0 and max value = your original value for this parameter. Hey presto - volume pedal for free!

         

        The Wah is just done normally: it is set to be turned on/off by the expression pedal toe switch and then controlled by EXP-2 i.e. what the expression pedal changes to when the toe switch is pressed.

         

        Does this make sense?

         

        On the stereo thing, do you mean dual tone? In which case it will work (but not sound as good) by just having them panned centre and running a mono output. If there are stereo FX in it however, it will loose its feel quite a lot.

         

        Jason

        • ralera Just Startin' 14 posts since
          Dec 29, 2010

          About exp-1 controlling the channel volume. I've done this from the beggining but set max=100%. I've noticed a lot of patches set the channel volume much lower. Are you aware of any issues that could come up from setting the channel volume at max? I ask because I've noticed most of the tape delays I've tried to use are distorted on the repeats even if I have the output level for the effect relitivly low. I usually have the exp-1 vol at full toe position but wondered if lower channel volume levels would be better. I think I read somewhere that higher channel volume levels made a big difference in the amp model dynamics.

           

           

          Alan

      • daveschutt Just Startin' 280 posts since
        Sep 8, 2008

        Jeff- Go to your local music store and pickup an XLR Y-adapter.  I had the same problem regarding stereo patches or just that many say you need to pan all your patches hard left or right if you are running mono out to the board.  This solved my problem and was only $11

    • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
      Apr 19, 2008

      Jason..tell me about the fx loop boost thing...like exaclty how I would hook it up.

      Thanks bro

  • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
    Apr 19, 2008

    Jason & Hitchface...thnaks for the replies.  Good point Hitch...I eventually did go flat on the sounboard, but ran out of time to mess with the HD.

    Jason...I was reading another post the other day regarding people trying to boost...I'll pass this link along to them.

     

    Again, if you (or anyone for that matter) has any ideas on good patches that are tried and true on PA's, let me know please!

     

    Jeff

  • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
    Apr 19, 2008

    HELP!!!

    Well, I tried the HD500 again at church the other day with the eq flat on the soundobard.  Jason's patch was a good starting point.  I ended up changing the amp to the Z as it was brighter and seemed better in this room.  However, I am still really, I mean REALLY displeased with this thing.  I am really happy with the pedalboard I put together and my amp(s) as they were working out great.  Going to a silent stage at church presented a problem I thought could be corrected by the POD, but I am now second guessing it.  This whole digital thing to me sounds like a mic'd cab with the mic way back.  It's just weak and lame sounding compared to the very thing that it is trying immitate. I am debating on whether I should continue to pour time into this thing or just sell it and use the money to get something like a Palmer PDI-03 or a Koch Loadbox -both have a power soak and an xlr out - and use my amp and pedalboard again.  But, then I go back to why I decided to try the POD in the first place - convenience.  Carrying equipment around is not fun anymore.  So, if ANYONE has any good tones and tricks or whatever that are working for you in your church, PLEASE share them with me before this thing ends up in the trash can.  Jason, thanks again for your patch...it has been the best so far, but still doesn't sound great when compared to the real thing.

     

    Thanks all!

    Jeff

    • gurumonkey Just Startin' 78 posts since
      Jan 29, 2010

      hey.

       

      here's a few notes.

       

      don't try to get your old tones if you've switched from a live amp to a silent stage.  that's not going to work right.  you need to work closely with your front of house guy to get sounds that work in the mix.

       

      turn off your reverbs for live playing.  use delay if you need to body up. 

    • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
      Jul 1, 2007

      Yeah, kill any reverb you've got going, and forget about trying to get your old tones back. It is a different rig altogether. Fiddle with the A.I.R. settings and change up cabs and mics as you go. I am finding that most of the problems with the "blanket over the speakers" and "mic is far away" comments revolve around people not actually trying more than one or two settings.

      • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
        Apr 19, 2008

        Thanks so far guys...no reverb used...enough of it already in the room.

        What did you mean by A.I.R.?

        I have tried numerous settings, amps, you name it....I was there for over 5 hours the other day alone doing nothing but tweaking and playing.  The sound just seems "dead" compared to a mic'd amp (which is now not a possibility).

        Take a look at the patches I attached and see if I am going in the right direction or not.

        The clean is trying to mimic my pedalboard now - even the switch layout so I dont get confused!

        Jason_Kennedy's patch was actually not a bad starting point, ended up changing to a z amp and changing cabs, but still not a full tonewise and what I am looking for and expect.

        Thanks again!

        Jeff

        Attachments:
        • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
          Jul 1, 2007

          Sorry, I fell victim to L6 term ambiguity. The setting in the EDIT program is called E.R., which is basically the amp-in-the-room simulator. Fiddle with that some...you might like what you get.

           

          Since I am here, the FX loop boost is really easy. Plug a patch cable into both the FX loop send and return. Boost the return volume. Voila, instant boost at the press of a foot switch.

           

          Don't forget that if your room has reverb issues, you WILL lose some of the sizzle and sparkle you are looking for. There is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for that effectively without treating the room.

    • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
      Mar 13, 2007

      I am still in the X3L zone but based on the problem/conditon you are describing, it sounds like the Fletcher Munson Curve syndrome. Basically if it sounds great at home low volume or through phones and stinks (like you describe) when you turn it up live, I suggest checking out the Fletcher Munson study. In a nut shell it shows that as volume increases, upper mids flatten out. Visually a EQ curve "smile" at low volume turns in to a flat crooked line at 80-90 Db. Try taking one of your basic tones and scoop out the upper-mid. The X3 has a four band EQ, so I cut the third band from the left.

       

      Since I don't have the HD, I am making a stab here as well, does the HD have a "Focus" adjustment in the output section? With the X3, I took one of my greasy high gain tones and hammered a chord then turned the focus adjust until I liked it.

       

      Seriously, my Xt and X3 were headed to the storage unit until I read the FM study. It totally changed how I approach effects. It made the difference from heavy brittle overbearing tones to tones that simply sing!

       

      I found a simple version of the study here on the Line 6 site. Type "Fletcher Munson study" in to the search bar. Actually, I found it by typing in "why does the tone of my X3 stink", it took me to a discussion that lead to the FM study.

       

      Once I get past Christmas, I may be looking at the HD500, or searching E-bay for used X3s!

       

      God bless bro...Happy Birthday Jesus!

       

      PS. I error on the side of too much reverb and delay or multiple delays. I love big 80s guitar and love large sweeping notes that sound like they are coming from the bottom of the Grand Canyon!...That's just me!

      • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
        Apr 19, 2008

        I have heard of the Fletcher Munson curve thing, but haven't looked in to it at all.  If anyone here can help out on this with the HD500,particularly with the EQ'ing and adjusting the "focus" (as it was referred to on the X3)...I am ALL EARS!  If this works, we might be on to something here resolving the great headphone/lousy pa sound syndrome!

        Thanks folks!

        Jeff

        Amen brother! Happy Birthday JESUS!!

        • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
          Jul 1, 2007

          Well, you could probably just go really simple and scoop the mids on the mixer EQ without having to preset changes.

          • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
            Mar 13, 2007

            I am not sure if cutting it at the board works quite the same. It is probably for sure worth a try. I know once I fixed it in my unit, it didn't matter where I plugged it in or who was running sound.

             

            D

            • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
              Jan 28, 2007

              Hey Strat - were you using the parametric EQ on the X3 Live, or are you talking about the AMP's EQ settings?

               

              Either way, would you mind posting your settings in detail just to illustrate the point further? I'm very interested in the adjustments people have made with regards to the Fletcher-Munson study.

               

              Thanks!

            • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
              Jul 1, 2007

              Yeah, my assumption is that the venue always stays the same I guess. I am not even bothering to tweak my unit at home any more because I have no reference speakers of any kind. Everything happens at the church.

              • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
                Apr 19, 2008

                I am interested in hearing if the EQ is done on the amp settings or is there another place in the POD to EQ?  I am more interested in tweaking my tone first in the POD with the sound board set to flat EQ, then -if needed- let the sound guy do the final tweaking.  But at least I could start with a workable tone.

                You guys are coming up with some great ideas.  Too bad Line6 didn't do any testing on PA's and give some instruction on setting up the unit to get good tone.  It seems like that would be in their best interest.

                 

                Thanks all!

                 

                Jeff

                • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
                  Jul 1, 2007

                  Well here is my take. If your church PA is of reasonable quality, and the characteristics of the sound booth equipment relatively normal (master EQ is set to flatten the room response, etc) then you can sdjust your POD with reasonable confidence that you aren't hearing false tones. But like I said, if the room either isn't treated or isn't designed for acoustical properties, there is the first place to start. No EQ tweaking out there can make up for a bad room.

                   

                  You can add EQ pedals to your rig, which I find myself doing a lot. I am finding that I can nail some of my tones much easier with more than 1 level of EQ.

                  • Jeff_Vickery Just Startin' 50 posts since
                    Apr 19, 2008

                    Thanks hitchface,

                     

                    Our board is a Roland M-400, and the room is treated.  The hours that I have spent there working on tones, I have found that on distortion, for example, I have had to back way off of the gain so as not to sound so fizzy, and the levels have had to be brought down to say 3 or 4% so there's not a HUGE boost when the distortion is engaged.  Also, I noticed quite a bit of lag, or latency, when playing.  Seems like my playing is ahead of the sound being delivered....I don't have that with a mic'd amp.  It's not much, but it's weird (no delay engaged).

                    I am excited to try out some of the tones sent earlier.  Hopefully, you guys can start getting me on track.

                    I just ordered a body glove keyboard 25 case from sam ash for $49.99.  I am really wanting this POD to work out for me.  Hang in there with me guys!

                    Thanks to all

                    Jeff

                • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
                  Mar 13, 2007

                  Just for a frame of reference, here is my rig.

                  X3L- XLR to the board, 1/4" out to a 50 watt solid state, solid back Marshall in front of me aimed at my face for a monitor. I can adjust the amp without affecting the house. The amp pretty much runs flat, no drive in the gain.

                   

                  So once again, I am talking from an X3 point of view and not an HD point of view.

                   

                  The EQing that I am talking about is 95% in the pod unit. Yes, I will scoop out the upper mid in the parametric EQ, I also watch the high Freq and the Presence settings in the Amp modeling section. Once again if it sounds sweet at home through phones, I will bet that when you set it up through the system, itwill sound harsh, brittle and wooden all at the same time. I have gotten used to my settings at home for practice being a litte more dull than the live sounds.

                   

                  Have you checked to see if there is a focus adjust in the general output section? As a side note have you checked the "panning" in the output section? I forgot to mention that when I first got my X3 the stereo outs were panned left and right. So through phones it sounded nice. A mono out would either produce and overly dry sound or an overly effected sound. I use mono- Left for everything so they outputs are now panned accordingly, both to center.

                   

                  I attached the FM curve. The scale down the side is volume and the scale at the bottom is frequency. You can see that as you turn it up the upper mids start creeping up. The highs go off the chart, that is were "fizzy" happens.

                   

                  Here is the deal, take one tone, go into the parametric, turn down that third band (below the midway line). Then turn down the high and the presence, then crank it up in the system.

                   

                  My conclusion about Line 6 is that they have created infinately adjustable units. One can really drill down in to the guts of the devices and mess with them.That is part of the value, but at the same time, for some of us end users, the learning curve is steep. It took me 2 years, much frustration and almost giving up to finally figure it out. Now,  I wouldn't dream of playing without the POD.

                   

                  As far as publishing tones, I am generally responding from work, so my rig and files are not here. I will try to get after that once I get past Christmas. We have a HUGE Christmas Eve-Eve service that I am preparing for. If anyone is in the Escondido, California area are on the 23rd, will we be at the Escondido Performing Arts Center staring at 7:00. It is free!. Come up and say hello, I will be the old guy with the loud guitar!  PLT!

                   

                  By the way, it will be a great limus test for the X3L , as we won't be going through our system,and our sound people will be advisory only.

                  • fstaunton Just Startin' 80 posts since
                    Mar 3, 2010

                    The approach I've taken to the EQ-Volume issue is to use Lincoln's patches EQ settings, which have made a major improvement on the sound in church versus at home.  I'm still using the X3L but they will likely translate to an EQ block on the HD500. 

                     

                    His settings on his main LB-Variac patch are as follows: 

                         Low Freq=100 Hz, Gain set at 0db (flat)

                         Low-Mid Freq=250 Hz , Gain set at 0db (flat)

                         High-Mid Freq=750 Hz, Gain set at +3.0db

                         High Freq=3.0k Hz, Gain set at +1.8db

                     

                    The Fletcher-Munson phenomenon is real.  Hope this helps.  -- Fred

                    • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
                      Jan 28, 2007

                      In looking at the EQ's that are available on the HD500 - is there an EQ that allows for the same level of customization as the global parametric EQ that the X3 Live had? It sure would be nice to have that global parametric EQ that doesn't take up an FX slot on the HD500...

                      • fstaunton Just Startin' 80 posts since
                        Mar 3, 2010

                        I don't have the HD500, but their advanced user guide lists the ...

                         

                        "Graphic EQ, a handy 5-band Graphic Equalizer for your tone-shaping needs. A 12dB gain boost or cut is offered for each of the frequency bands: 80Hz, 220Hz, 480Hz, 1.1KHz and 2.2KHz."

                         

                         

                        ... which appears to be your best choice.  I would try applying the similar settings to the highest three frequencies to see what sounds best.  It does appear to require an FX slot.  Good luck tweaking.

                      • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
                        Jan 28, 2007

                        It sure would be nice to have that global parametric EQ that doesn't take up an FX slot on the HD500...

                         

                        Although, on the flip-side of this argument, I guess having an EQ as one of the FX would make it easier to tweak your patches at home, and then only run the EQ (post-everything) effect to adjust for the fletcher-munson curve when you're playing live.

                      • eightthree Just Startin' 104 posts since
                        Jan 28, 2007

                        Lawless33 wrote:

                         

                        fstaunton,

                         

                        Where exactly is the EQ placed in the chain?  Before or after the amp block, etc.  Thanks!

                         

                        Wes

                         

                        On the X3 Live it was always after the amp block, and after the compressor, but before the delay and reverb effects (if they were set in the post position). On the HD500 you can technically put it anywhere, but post is probably best for most setups.

                        • Preston_Smith Just Startin' 1 posts since
                          Jul 10, 2008
                          Currently Being Moderated
                          Dec 28, 2010 10:27 AM (in response to eightthree)
                          Re: EQ settings

                          Ok, I'm an XL3 Live guy, but I think the same settings will apply here (I hope).  I am linking a youtube video that is very helpful in the setup.  At 3:29 he shows a great global parametric EQ setting to get rid of the fizz sound on the X3.  Note, the -12db at 12k.  Although this is way above the FM curve frequencies, this does resolve the "grittyness, metallic sound".  This youtube channel is a great resource for the pod users.  I don't know if he is using the HD500 yet ( I did not really look) but he helped be get a jumping off point for my own settings.

                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNyvbqzr87o

                           

                          On a side note, I am an audio engineer (not just a "sound guy") and the FM curves are real, although the study only tested Mr. Fletcher and Mr. Munson.  The curve is important when running at loud volumes for anything, including PA or guitar rigs.  The "Loudness" button on steroes boosts the lows and some of the highs to compensate for the FM curve at low volume.  As you turn up the stereo with the loudness button on, the bass usually becomes too loud.  Now most stereos are set to turn down the loudness effect as the volume goes up automaticly.

                           

                          As to the delayed effect while playing, you are hearing the "slow" speed of sound.  There is an audible delay coming from the PA speakers back to your playing location.  You never noticed this before because your amp was very close to you.  Now the amp is not there.  Wearing In Ear Monitors will resolve this issue, or have a monitor speaker next to you will also resolve the issue (but the In Ear Monitor is the only solution for a silent stage).  The audience does not notice the slight delay because they are not playing in the band.  All the sound they hear arrives at the correct time.  There is nothing wrong with the PA or your HD500, your are just hearing the sound from speakers 30+ feet away from you. At my church the speakers are almost 60 feet in the air, and there is a big delay if you walk to the sound booth and try to play.

                           

                          I hope this helps,

                           

                          Preston

  • worshipviolin Just Startin' 22 posts since
    Jul 7, 2007

    Hey guys / gals.  Just in case anyone is interested, there is now a POD HD500 on a Pedaltrain PT-1 Pedalboard in a hardshell case that comes with the EX-1 expression pedal - all brand spankin' new in mint condition at a starting bid that is lower than if you bought the HD500 by itself.  Check it out or spead the word.

  • jcopeland1 Just Startin' 47 posts since
    Dec 2, 2006

    I am now using a POD HD 400 in church and I used to use a Fender hot Rod Deluxe.  What are the reccomendations for the Eq or ER settings for the HD 400?  Are there different Er settings is this what I should adjust to address the fletcher munson effect mentioned in this thread/

    • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
      Jul 1, 2007

      Far as I can tell, the ER setting is more for recording than live use. It stands for Early Reflections, to give you the amp in the room feel. If you don't have the amp in the room feel when you've actually got the amp in the room, you're hunting for a sound that doesn't exist.

       

      It is basically a specialized reverb, and most reverb isn't useful for a live scenario. Maybe add a tiny bit for some of the bigger cleans, but it just makes it muddy when you combine it with non-synthetic reverb.

       

      DISCLAIMER: I twiddled with that setting a little in our sanctuary and it gave incredible detail to some of my patches. HOWEVER, our room is brutal in terms of muddiness and reverb...my experience was that the ER setting enhanced in a very tasteful and somewhat intangible way some of the higher frequencies without altering the core of the tone. YMMV.

      • jcopeland1 Just Startin' 47 posts since
        Dec 2, 2006

        So what should I adjust to make sure it sounds ok.  Would it just be like adjusting the normal amp (bass mid treble)?

        • scottcarrera Just Startin' 19 posts since
          May 11, 2007

          You'll want to hear your tones through the mains where you play.  Stay away from reverbs when playing live.  Also, try to hear through the mains with other instruments.  And remember that the room will sound completely different when it is filled with people.  Lots of ppl will gobble up hit higher freqs.  I always leave the board flat and control EQ on the POD.  It's just easier that way, especially if you have different tones that require different types of EQ.

        • hitchface Just Startin' 334 posts since
          Jul 1, 2007

          Depends on your ears. Here is my basic guideline for amp sounds, which may differ from yours, but here it is anyhow

           

          1. Forget what you know about amps. You are using an amp modeller...listen with your ears instead of past amp experience.

           

          2. Tweak in the environment you will be playing in, with the equipment it will be coming out of. I sat in the middle of my sanctuary with the mixer EQ'ed flat and the POD coming out of the mains. I tweaked for about 4 hours in my first run, and anywhere between an hour to 3 hours each time thereafter, always the same setup.

           

          3. Don't go tone deaf. After you tweak for a while, go listen to material you know well and like a lot to compare against. It will probably point out deficiencies in your tone that you didn't notice before.

           

          4 Always get the sound guy's opinion (if he is also a music nut). He will tell you how well your sounds are sitting in the mix, which is the most important. He can also point out issues that you might not be hearing. Take his advice with a grain of salt...he is not you, nor does he have your ears. BUT...use him/her.

           

          Start with that and you'll learn a ton.

          • serviviente Just Startin' 3 posts since
            May 5, 2011

            i recently got a 500 and i was having a horrible time trying to dial it in direct to my church PA system. I spent hours and hours and was not even getting close to the results i wanted. I was almost giving up when I decided to try something different. Instead of going and try to tweak a sound that I already had made i decided to just built my scene in the 500 with the effects and amp i wanted BUT this time i made no tweak at all, i just went the the effects as a blank canvas. Before going there i visited the Glenndale website  and also made some notes regarding delays, and reverbs settings from Lincoln Brewster X3 patches. When i went to church this is what i did:

            1. set the mix to flat in the fh

            2. dial a good clean amp tone ...dr. z for me

            3..I went straight to my eq effect and tried to improve on the clean sound i had dial with the amp knobs

            4. set my compressor levels....very minimal here

            5. work my chorus/modulations

            6. worked my delays...mostly to brewsters specs...from there i went

            7. decided that there was not need for any reverb....it just was muddying things up

            8. WORK on my dirt!!!!

             

            In the past i spent at least 6 hours (all together) trying to get a decent sound. This time it took me 45 min. and i was loving it. I took that good present and copied to my next user preset( this will give me a good starting point) and took out the chorus, and dirt. and put a noise gate, set the delay longer, and added a DISTORTION effect for my lead sound.I then compared the volume of the 2 new patches and voila, again loved it. I just came from church and i can not be more happy. It sounded killer. The other guitar player was also crazy about the sound. I think i finally did it. I made the 500 sound killer thru my church PA. I am happy.

            • daveschutt Just Startin' 280 posts since
              Sep 8, 2008

              Servivente-  What EQ are you using?  That has been my biggest gripe with the HD is their EQ's. I'd be interested to know your settings too.

              • leewhit6 Just Startin' 48 posts since
                Dec 9, 2010

                The EQ's are the worst! Don't understand why they are not set up for user defined frequencies. A 4 or 5 band that has overlaping frequency points would be great. Some of the places that need to  be cut are just not an option.  No combination of EQ's can get it.

                • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
                  Mar 13, 2007

                  I am  jumping in because of like issues. You all may already know this stuff. I may be "preaching ot the choir", if so, please bear with me.

                   

                  I don't have my rig in front of me so my comments are based on my memory.

                   

                  I agree that the EQ isn't as friendly as for instance the X3L EQ, which was visual and simple IMHO.

                   

                   

                  THe HD parametric EQ has a Q adjust if I recall, and I had to do some reading up on the function of Q for a recording project that I am working on. I believe it helped me  to  better understand EQs.   THe Q function will adjust the bandwith based on a calculation of Hz/Q. A high Q number is narrow, a low Q number is wide. I wound up printing out a chart of bandwidths at different frquencies and Q values. As a benchmark, I just remember that a Q of 2 is 1/2 the bandwith of the target frequency. So a Q of 2 on 440Hz would be 220 Hz wide. So at a Q setting of 2 at 440Hz the lower limit is 343.542 and the upper is 563.542.  Odd that it doesn't center on 440, must be an x-factor in the calculation formula. I am no sonic genius, I used an online Q calculator for  this so that I would be accurate for this discussion. At any rate, by setting the Q factor I think you can get the bands to overlapp predictably. Or with a large Q number, you can grab a narrow frequency and manipulate it.

                   

                  The other thing I did some time back was I printed out a guitar neck frequency chart, to thelp me zone in on particular parts of the neck that notes sound dull, or maybe zing too much.

                   

                  Q does the same thing in modulation devices, it will make a device subtle or make it sound like is turning over on itself.

                   

                  Another thing that I am exeriencing with the HD is that signal chain is everything! Where a person sets a device  in the signal chain can take a average sounding patch and make it sparkle or roar!

                   

                  Blessings, Strato

              • serviviente Just Startin' 3 posts since
                May 5, 2011

                sorry for the late reply i have been busy. i am at work right now but once i get to my home i will be posting some settings. I will love to post on custom tone but i have no idea how that is done....later

                • stevest Just Startin' 15 posts since
                  Mar 3, 2010

                  I just got my HD500 last week.  Spent a couple hours today working on patches at our church today.  The other instruments we use are a 12 string acoustic, an acoustic bass, acoustic drum set, and a keyboard.  The guitars and keyboard are run through the sound board.  Most of our singers are women so we have a lot of highs and not many lows going on.  I also run sound for our church so I deal with that side of it as well. I developed this patch to help round our sound out.  It's a dual amp patch using a Hiway 100 and a Tweed B Man.  I run an EXP-1 expression pedal as well so I assigned the pedals to the volume of each amp into the mixer and I have the tweed setup more for lows so I can roll that off depending on the song.  Put a small amount of delay and reverb in as well and put a volume pedal at the very end assigned to FS4 so I can mute everything easily.  Then a noise gate and a small amount of compression on the front end.  I'm playing a strat with Lace sensor holy grails in the neck and mid which have a vintage strat sound and a Lace sensor dually red/silver in the bridge that I split and am only running on the red side here - running all 3 pickups in parallel.  It also sounded very good on the neck/mid position.  This is a clean only patch as that's the only style we use.  Here's the link to the patch on custom tone:

                   

                  http://line6.com/customtone/tone/213159/

        • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
          Mar 13, 2007

          Once again, I am speaking from an X3 perspective. I think some of the same rules apply...

          .

          How are you routed or plugged in, for instance are you sending a 1/4" to your HR Deluxe and the XLR to the board, or are you micing your amp,with no direct sends to the board?

           

          It is going to make a difference.

           

          My on stage amp (Marshall 50 Watt SS) is a monitor only, I run 1/4" out to it and an XLR to the house. Once again, if you monitor from the board, it is a possibility that the sound tech will EQ your guitar signal ,which you will then adjust, causing the sound tech to adjust, causing you to... and so on.

           

           

          As a general rule, I scoop the upper mids out of each individual patch. Then I plug my 1/4"  (set to Combo Front) out to my amp, pick a pretty punchy tone, crank it up and rotate the focus control on the output section until it sounds good. My focus right now is set at about 375hz. And the highs are pulled down in that section as well.

           

          I believe that the focus control doesn't affect the XLRs, or the headphones, at least in the X3.

           

          Our sanctuary seats around 500, and at Christmas we moved to a theater that seats around 5,000. I didn't have to change a thing, because I adjust to my monitor and let the house do the house.

           

          This has worked well for me anyway.

           

          OK OK, I will be dropping the hammer on an HD 500 in August!

           

          Blessings all!!!

  • Stratotron Just Startin' 132 posts since
    Mar 13, 2007

    Hot tip!!!

    I travel on a couple of gear chat sites, and the word on the street even from folks that don't like amp modelers is, the DR Z amp model in the HD is the BOMB. I heard a sample that a guy used on a recording and it was way sweet. I would dabble with the DR Z model as soon as possible!

     

    Blessings.

  • serviviente Just Startin' 3 posts since
    May 5, 2011

    sorry....i forgot to mention that having the key to the church helps too. Still even with plenty of access i was growing frustrating to the point where i was going to sell my 500....not anymore.

      • AfroNinja13 Just Startin' 2 posts since
        Dec 25, 2010

        Hopefully this thread isn't completely dead.  I just found out recently that using the pre-amp models is basically using the clean setting on the amp.  If you're looking for Hillsong's "clean" tone (it sounds driven but it doesn't break up ex. solo from This Is Our God") then you might want to try the vox ac-15 pre-amp model with the Greenback 25 4x12 cab, 421 Dynamic mic.  I play a Suhr Classic-T (which is similar to a Telecaster but mine has a humbucker in the neck)  and I usually put the drive at about 60 or 70 percent to get a a good present sounding tone with minimal clipping.  Both the drive and the volume parameter are very dynamic with the other EQ parameters. I typically run the volume at 100% because the treble, cut, and bass controls are much more responsive.  I'll leave the rest of the EQ settings for you determine based on your guitar.  I've also been toying with some dirt boxes on this same effect (just an observation, if you find a good clean tone that you like, you can usually get a good sounding crunch from the same patch: I prefer using the Screamer, and sometimes tube drive) and I like what i'm hearing so far.  The only issue I have with the AC-15 model in general is that i'm still having trouble to get a good present sounding drive.  But you can always switch to a completely different patch to get around that issue.  Hope this helps.

  • rodjoe Just Startin' 8 posts since
    Apr 29, 2012

    Greetings to everyone, directly from the warm(now hot ;-)) Caribbean. Thought you guys might like this approach which I certainly love. Still waiting to get my new gear at end of month thou. Anyway, check this out and see if it is a useful setup for you. Bless!!!

    http://pietrosquared.wordpress.com/2-voice-guitar-and-the-variax/

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)