Skip navigation
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 Previous Next 10717 Views 161 Replies Latest reply: Oct 19, 2012 12:19 AM by Guitarmaniac64 RSS Go to original post
  • alfmetal70 Just Startin' 104 posts since
    Feb 3, 43473

     

  • alfmetal70 Just Startin' 104 posts since
    Feb 3, 43473

    sorry if sound personal in my post I wrote about what I think from the actual company "move" in the updates, greetings and I will continue working and in the nigth... guitar again

  • lowyaw Just Startin' 215 posts since
    May 5, 2010

    what if L6 offer one amp more in the upcomung HD500 update? and also, one cab more, and there'll be DEP for, say, delays? will you post an apoligy and bow your head humbly in front of their infinite wisdom?

  • spaceatl Expert Line 6 User 4,456 posts since
    Jan 24, 2007

    uh...hmmm....Half? HD400 is $100 less than the HD500....Yes, if suits were running the company then I could totally understand updates happening at the same time or HDPro/500/Bean getting stuff first...I am kinda glad they are all guitar players...

     

    How many guitar players do it take to change a light bulb?

     

    12

     

    One to change it, and 11 to comment on how they would have done it differently and better...

     

    Guitarists are a fickle bunch...Amazing they come to agreement on anything...

  • phil_m Expert Line 6 User 4,243 posts since
    Jan 25, 2007

    I think people are analyzing this way too much, personally. I think Line 6's reasoning was something like, "hey we made the 300 and 400 guys wait a long time for this update, let's throw them a little bonus to make up for that. Many of those guys tend to be metalheads anyway, so they'll probably love these new metal amps."

     

    As they say, though, no good deed goes unpunished...

  • Karl_Houseknecht Expert Line 6 User 3,732 posts since
    Jan 25, 2007

    PaulBateman wrote:

     

    It is the flagship model...

     

    Is it?  Or if we go by the logic of assigning flagship status to the name of the unit, wouldn't that be the "HD Pro"?

  • mazuwa Iknowathingortwo 371 posts since
    Jul 7, 2006

    As HD300/400 firmware came out together, last time it was also for 500/pro/desktop devices at the same time.

  • spaceatl Expert Line 6 User 4,456 posts since
    Jan 24, 2007

    You have been right since the start Karl....people want the coffee...

  • sethwolbert Just Startin' 8 posts since
    Aug 24, 2007

    When I was researching the pod 300,400 and 500, I noticed how the different pods were marketed to appeal to different guitarists based on their needs. Effects, outputs etc. So I chose the 500 simply because it had everything that line 6 had to offer in the pod hd series.  When the update became available for the 300 and 400, it just made me feel slighted.  How can they market it as a pod that has everything, but it doesn't? I am fully aware that line 6 doesn't have to put out any free firmware updates for us, but since they are, why not make it consistent? Even if they complete new firmware for one product before the other, why not wait and release them together to keep it fair and to avoid all this confusion. I know they are always researching and creating new models, but why confuse people and create all this frustration?  It all seems very needlessly complicated. If Line 6 would have released the update for the pod 500,400 and 300 all at the same time, this could all have been avoided and I wouldn't feel like I payed top dollar for a product that is supposed to have all the hd models that line 6 has to offer, but doesn't.

  • RipperShred Just Startin' 82 posts since
    Jul 26, 2009

    Totally. Patience is virtue. You'd think the 500/pro/bean was garbage considering how people are loosing their minds. Com'on people, stop being so short sighted; we're probably going to get some slamin' stuff when the new firmware drops. And it's not like you can't get awesome tones out of the boxes as they are now.

     

    I'll be surprised if there aren't additional amps (hoping for the same high gain amps everyone else is) above and beyond the SLO100 etc. If we wait a month or two, and there's absolutely nothing new and interesting beyond what is currently in the 300/400 update, then, maybe then, I might understand people crapping their pants.

     

    I'd rather give them time to finish up something really good, then ***** and moan them into giving us a rushjob update with one new amp model in. Though I'm probably the minority here.

  • PaulBateman Just Startin' 82 posts since
    Mar 19, 2010

    i dont think anyone is losing their mind over this... but speaking for myself, it was never the point how long i waited for it.. or even that i had to have it..

     

    People expected the 500/pro to get first crack at everything.. its how everyone else does things.. L6's stance (good or bad) is just... different than expected..

     

    to me, its disheartening to see how they develop these units... the old model packs rolled out to everyone at the same time regardless of the hardware they were using.. but now its pretty obvious the HD line is being treated as 2 completely seperate products with nothing being interchangable (im guess the cab DEP being exclusive means a crapload of extra work for everything).. it doesnt give any hope for timely releases, how many months did the 300/400 users wait? theres no reason to believe we wont be waiting the same time if not longer..

     

    its simply annoying to see something i want only available to people that bought a lower-end unit.. its backwards business in my mind, it has nothing to do with impatience

  • RipperShred Just Startin' 82 posts since
    Jul 26, 2009

    Well, no offense, but are we reading the same posts? I would say "losing their minds" is me being politically correct. I would say batsh*t crazy is a much more fitting description of what's happening. I own an HD Pro, and while i get the whole Skwisgar-ian "this ams the mosts expensivists so it's gots to be the mosts awesomists unit" angle, I saw it in a different light; I saw it as "line6 saying thank you for not pawning your 300/400s", and I saw it as a glimmer of hope that the R&D were listening to the masses clamouring for a more comprehensive high gain model selection.

     

    I'm sure line 6 saw it the way I see it, and in retrospect probably should've made a parrallel anouncement when they launched the 300/400 firmware indicating to the high-end user base that they'll get something worth the wait they're gonna suffer in the interim. This would have done much to reduce the sh*tstorm that has since ensued.

     

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the SLO100 crunch/lead models, I'm sure it's got the highgain marshall-y goodness that I'm hankerin' for (amoung other highgain tones that I'm jonsin' for) but I figure in a couple of weeks/a month/whatever from now the same thing'll happen when the new 500/pro/bean firmware drops; we'll get the SLOs, originals, AND something(s) new and awesome as well. Personally I'm hoping for the 5150II, Mesa MkIV & IIC+, and JCM900 & 2000s. I wouldn't shed any tears if they threw in a Diezel or two, either A guy can only hope, right?

     

    As for it being backwards business? Yes and no, and I say more no than yes. No, it's not bad business, it's good business because it garners a lot of goodwill from the people who bought the mid and low end versions - which I have to believe is Line 6's bread-and-butter; not everyone's got top dollar to shell out for premium floorboards or rack units - and that goodwill carry to word of mouth advertising. The only bad-business I see here is just going radio-silent on us. I think if they said "I know the top of the line units are temporarily short a few models, but if you can be patient for a little while, here's what we're doing with the pro/500/bean firmware and you can expect X new models such as X-Y-Z etc. bug fixes, etc"

     

    That's the only bad business I can see happening; not communicating better with the established user base.

1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 Previous Next

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)