Skip navigation
377 Views 25 Replies Latest reply: Jan 4, 2013 12:14 PM by RonMarton RSS
Reason413 Just Startin' 28 posts since
Dec 13, 2012
Currently Being Moderated

Dec 31, 2012 3:11 PM

XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

Ok so I bought the XDV 35 recently and I love it, great mic... alot of handling noise unfortunately but not enough to make me dislike it....  however, I won a killer deal on Ebay an XDV-30 and when testinnowg it side by side with the XDV 30 the mic is so much better on the handling noise ( there is noticably less of it )  Is there some kind of gain adjustment inside of the mic itself??

both are handheld mics... the Mics are the same model number....    they both sound the same when singing or talking...  I can make them similar as far as the handling noise by lowering the gain on the reciever connected to the XDV35 handheld its not the recievers because there is no change when I switch handhelds so its definately the hotter mic is the one that came with the XDV35...  Im just wondering why this might be... and is there some kind of adjustment... could it be the batteries?? both show full charge... but could that have something to do with it??

 

One more thing...  Both Handsets work with the XDV35 reciever.. but only the handheld that came with the XDV30 works with the XDV 30 reciever.. why is that??

    • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
      Jan 12, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated
      Dec 31, 2012 5:29 PM (in response to Reason413)
      Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

      I'll just address the one bit of your conundrum that I understand, Reason413...

       

      Switching the newer (V35) handheld to RF1 mode will not only allow its full interoperability with the older V30 receiver, but is also (to my mind) the far more robust of the two frequency schemes.

       

      You'd need to do this anyway, as any attempt to simultaneously operate both schemes in the one venue will almost certainly end in tears ...and we all hate seeing fully-grown adults cry, ...common though that sight may be at this time of year.

       

      Aside from the paperwork that should have been enclosed with your new unit, the full "step-by-step" guide to performing that switch-over can also be found in Line6Tony's excellent paper, here:

       

      http://line6.com/support/docs/DOC-2645

       

      Regrettably, all I can do is share and commiserate with your bafflement at the differences between two editions of what should be identical capsules.

       

      Like you, I'm hoping that someone from Line 6 can chime in with more information.

    • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
      Jan 12, 2012
      Currently Being Moderated
      Jan 1, 2013 5:00 AM (in response to Reason413)
      Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

      The V30's an earlier model with older firmware that pre-dates Line 6's development of the more "WiFi and Bluetooth friendly" RF2 scheme of frequencies, ...so it's behaving exactly as it should.

       

      As

      1. It's so easy to switch your newer V35 to the RF1 scheme and
      2. You are definitely setting yourself up for range-limiting and dropout "disasters" with both schemes operating together,

       

      I'd strongly recommend that you "default" to operating your gear on different channels of the RF1 four-frequency diversity scheme, rather than suffer the inconvenience and cost of surrendering your V30 to have its firmware updated for access to the less robust two frequency diversity RF2 scheme, an upgrade that I consider to be futile, UNLESS you regularly operate very close to (and wish to co-operate with) WiFi and Bluetooth users.

       

      As for the variation in capsule responses, in my experience Guitar Center are one of the more reputable and easily approachable suppliers, so maybe a call to their toll-free (866) 498 7882 might yield a trial swap to another capsule, ...in the event that Line 6 indicate that you may have received an atypical "rogue".

        • dboomer Line 6 Support 1,997 posts since
          Oct 13, 2008
          Currently Being Moderated
          Jan 1, 2013 9:29 AM (in response to Reason413)
          Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

          One of the advantages of Line6 digital mics is that they product the full low frequencies of the mic capsule.  Because of that you may ( or not) notice more handling noise than other brands which simple cut off the mic.  When using the mics for vocals it's probably a good idea to engage the mixer's high pass filters switch on the input channels.

           

          The mic capsules are different between V30 and V35 mics and there are some small differences in the new v2 firmware that may account for a difference in level.  If you flash the V30 with the new firmware it should make them the same.

           

          WRT the speakers and their input controls, you probably want to turn them down to the 10'oclock position for most mixers.  That should improe the noise problem a lot.

            • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
              Jan 12, 2012
              Currently Being Moderated
              Jan 1, 2013 12:53 PM (in response to Reason413)
              Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

              Don is indeed referring to transmitter firmware, ...as I was earlier when I recommended against going to the trouble of upgrading the V30.

               

              Your preference for the "older" sound and your possible swap to third party capsules would both seem to confirm that recommendation.

               

              As for the Mackie's well-engineered "Thump" powered speakers, achieving "horrible buzz and hum and intermittent crackling" from them in combination with any half-decent mixer is quite a feat, most likely caused by an unholy mess of defective and incorrect connections, coupled with incompetent operation.

               

              Your initial instinct regarding the gain structure is both correct and a pointer to that lack of technical expertise, as "5 o'clock" would have the Thumps' input attenuators "almost full on", the consequence of which would be an almost certain "underdriving" of the mixer for them to yield usable (albeit nasty-sounding) levels.

               

              "Almost full on" at the Thumps is pretty much "mic level" sensitivity, which is the probable source of most of the "hum and buzz".

               

              Mackie are at pains to mark "Unity" gain on their controls, which you'll see at the "noon" position on their Thumps, the theory being that maximum distortion-free gain can easily be obtained by setting to that mark and subsequently deriving signals from inputs attenuated so that the downstream controls of Mackie mixers yield correct levels when set to their "Unity" settings.

               

              As Don says, however, most of us tend to reduce the Thumps' input level attenuators so that they sit around the "10 or 11 o'clock" mark, which allows for roughly 3 to 4dB of "overshoot" in the event that unexpected peaks "catch out" the FOH mixer.

               

              That attenuation still yields levels that are more than adequate (friggin' loud enough) for most pubs and clubs, given the sensitivity of even the smaller Mackie (TH-12A) Thumps. 

            • dboomer Line 6 Support 1,997 posts since
              Oct 13, 2008
              Currently Being Moderated
              Jan 1, 2013 1:16 PM (in response to Reason413)
              Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

              When I talk about firmware you really need to flash both pieces.  Things that you might assume are in one piece may actually be in the other... Although all line 6 systems work together no matter if you have only flashed half the system ( to the lowest performance level).

               

              Now that I think about it I will have to check in a few days to see if there was any tweak done because of the change in capsules.  They are very close some there may not be any.

               

              How much difference in sensitivity are you experiencing?  Have you actually measured it?  There's probably a difference in sensitivity in your mixer channels as well so you'd really need to make a measurement to know whether or not you has a "problem".  The capsules are different  so you are not comparing apples to apples anyway.

              • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                Jan 12, 2012
                Currently Being Moderated
                Jan 1, 2013 1:30 PM (in response to dboomer)
                Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                Apparently, Don, the unfavourable "handling noise" artefacts to which Reason413 refers seem to follow the newer of the two capsules.

                 

                The report that they "sound the same as far as singing goes" would tend to confirm the accuracy of Line 6's "58" modeling that's built into both.

                 

                Given the intended application and the possibility of a Shure 58 "head swap", I honestly don't see that there's much to be gained by surrendering the eBay purchased V30 for re-flashing.

                  • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                    Jan 12, 2012
                    Currently Being Moderated
                    Jan 1, 2013 11:22 PM (in response to Reason413)
                    Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                    Me too.

                  • sdevino Product Dev 71 posts since
                    Jul 10, 43306
                    Currently Being Moderated
                    Jan 2, 2013 3:57 PM (in response to Reason413)
                    Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                    I am surprised too. They are the same part number and assembly. How recent is your V35?  We might want to run through a few here too.

                     

                    Initially the XD-V35's were tested to ensure they matched the sound design of the V30. So your result is not expected.

                     

                    Steve

                      • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                        Jan 12, 2012
                        Currently Being Moderated
                        Jan 2, 2013 5:04 PM (in response to Reason413)
                        Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                        If you're visiting the store...

                         

                        The friendly folks at Guitar Center may even allow you access to more than one of their stock of new or "demo" XD-V35s for an "on the spot" comparison between both them and your "original" XD-V30.

                         

                        That type of "test session" might yield really useful info as well as being good "P.R". for them.

                          • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                            Jan 12, 2012
                            Currently Being Moderated
                            Jan 2, 2013 7:41 PM (in response to Reason413)
                            Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                            For what it's worth, I'd have done the same...

                             

                            As I reckon you've still got a set-up that's way ahead of any similarly-priced wireless gear that's out there.

                             

                            You have also raised an interesting issue that I'm sure the Line 6 folks will now be investigating, given their excellent track record of consistent quality in all their products.

                              • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                                Jan 12, 2012
                                Currently Being Moderated
                                Jan 2, 2013 10:16 PM (in response to Reason413)
                                Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                                Yep, there are no such things as too much practice or enough learning !

                                 

                                As we discussed in another thread, the "openness" and "workable" proximity control of silky bass with the BK-1 made it one of my favourites as well.

                                 

                                Regarding mouth to mic "proximity", a technique you might try (largely only possible because of the XD-V's clean transmission and excellent suppression of feedback) would be to introduce moderate compression at the console to "give you back" some more of that distance-induced expression control.

                                 

                                In the absence of the magnificently intuitive dynamics built into Line 6's StageScape M20d, (...it's only money, after all...) there are a few surprisingly cheap Mackie and Yamaha mixers that do have excellent "one knob" compressors on some of their XL inputs.

                                 

                                If you get the opportunity, it would be great for you to experiment with "winding" one of those compressors up to somewhere between "9 o'clock and noon" to help provide something like that type of intuitive distance-controlled expression with your two XD-Vs.

                                  • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                                    Jan 12, 2012
                                    Currently Being Moderated
                                    Jan 3, 2013 12:19 PM (in response to Reason413)
                                    Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                                    While Behringer undoubtedly give the most "facilities per dollar", it's my opinion that their headroom is poorer and that their overall "sound" isn't as clean as the slightly more expensive Mackie and Yamaha equivalents.

                                     

                                    Regrettably, Mackie's cheapest mixer with "one knob" compressors is the powered PPM608,

                                     

                                    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/PPM608/

                                     

                                    but I feel that this little Yammie is a far sweeter-sounding and more rugged direct competitor to the Xenyx 1622, albeit at a (very slightly) higher price and without the USB :

                                     

                                    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/MG124cx/

                                     

                                    Bear in mind that, in expressing these opinions, I've neither affilliation with nor loyalty to any manufacturer or supplier.

                                      • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                                        Jan 12, 2012
                                        Currently Being Moderated
                                        Jan 3, 2013 6:28 PM (in response to Reason413)
                                        Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                                        These guys have a good deal on that sweet-sounding Mackie that includes a really handy Gator GMIX soft case:

                                         

                                        http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/829408-REG/Mackie_ProFX_16_16_Channel_USB.html

                                         

                                        I know it's twice the price of Behringer's Xenyx 1622, but IMHO it's vastly superior in ruggedness, versatility and (above all) "cleanliness" of audio.

                                         

                                        I also reckon it would be a crying shame to risk "dirtying" the clean CD-quality signal-path of your mics if your budget can indeed stretch to something as good as the ProFx 16.

                                         

                                        Although I find the inbuilt amps of my powered mixer handy for driving auxilliary monitors or delay feeds, I'm entirely with you in thinking that powered loudspeakers really are the better option for indoor gigs as they take care of so many variables at the "business end".

                                         

                                        (Naturally I much prefer not having mains voltages anywhere near my outdoor weather-proof One Systems and Bose speakers.)

                                         

                                        You may find it handy to pack three 30' extension cables loaded into one of these http://www.amazon.com/Quick-Winder-RAP-100-Electric-Fiber/dp/B0000225E4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1357265091&sr=8-1&keywords=quick+winder+rap-100+electric+cord+and+fiber+optic+cable+reel for power around the venues.

                                         

                                        As for Alto's PS4LA and PS2A powered speakers, I heard rave reports about them a few years ago, but I have a feeling that they're now discontinued, so you'd best check on parts and spares back-up before investing, should these be the models being offered cheaply.

                                         

                                        However Alto's current TS110A and 115A speakers are quickly winning lots of friends, so I'm looking forward to hearing some for myself.

                                          • RonMarton Iknowathingortwo 357 posts since
                                            Jan 12, 2012
                                            Currently Being Moderated
                                            Jan 4, 2013 12:14 PM (in response to Reason413)
                                            Re: XDV-30 & XDV35 differences

                                            There must be something in that Florida water, I reckon. Alto are yet another example of the wonderful and innovative music and audio scene they have down there.

                                             

                                            It can't possibly be due to Gatorade, can it?

                                             

                                            Forgive me, but before we get into an operational discussion of Behringer's excellent MDX4600 Multicom rack unit, ...three of what I guess are "philosophical" points:

                                             

                                            1. It ain't "stupidity". My half century of learning from others only became worthwhile precisely because I asked for clear answers, exactly as you're doing and I still do to this day;
                                            2. Not asking WOULD be stupid and
                                            3. For the sake of others who may have similar queries, (and if you don't mind) I'd prefer to answer this in response to a new question from you, maybe with a title along the lines of "Using An Outboard Compressor with XD-Vs" and preferably with tags such as: behringer compressor vocal_compression XD-V XD-V_and_compressor

                                             

                                            On reflection, I should have also made it clearer that the "headroom" and sonic reservations I expressed earlier in this discussion applied only to the Behringer "budget" or "entry-level" Xenyx that you mentioned and not to their entire product range, some components of which truly are first-rate.

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Legend

  • Correct Answers - 5 points
  • Helpful Answers - 3 points