Jul 16, 2009 10:46 AM
Pod XTL sounds too digital when recording?
-
Like (0)
I bought the XTL in Nov 08 hoping that it will make my tone better and that I can start recording with a good tone. Today I've noticed that when recording it sounds fine (through my speaker) but when I listen to it through my computer speakers it sounds so digital and I dislike it very much. Is there some way to make it sounds less digital/more tube-like?
In case you're wondering which amp model i'm using, i'm using the Solo 100, and for stomp i'm using FX-Boost.
I'm not familiar intimately with your specific product, but I have to believe that all the amp models are the same. I've recorded many guitar tracks and unless I tell someone what I used, they never guess it was all solid state ceertaily never guess a Line 6 Vetta plugged directly into the board.
First question I have for you is have you given any thought that it might be the interface between your POD and your computer? :Let's start there and see where it leads. Also I would recommend inviting some guys from the Variax Future forum. Specifically AMX and Crusty - they really know there stuff and are very willing to help out.
Take care,
Neal
aka Merlin FL on this forum
and OcalaMusician on YouTube if you want to hear and see my Variax 700 running through my Vetta in Live and studio settings.
thanks for the mention to merlin ![]()
first of all you cant really go by computer speakers. if anything when listening to your audio off the computer get a real good set of headphones. computer speakers are not meant to duplicate the sound of ant true amp.
secondly if you want to get less of a digital sound you need to get something with an actual tube in it in my opinion. what i use is an older vox tonelab. just my preferance then you may want to experement with the actual tube in the unit. some tubes are warmer than others you can go to there web site and theres some info there about different tubes in there pedals. mines a desk top. t hey also have two floor models. they have just recently come out with a more compact model with a volume peddle attatched i dont need that as i have an old vox wah which i put a crossover to use it as a volume or wah depending on what i need at the time you can get the one i got off ebay usually around 100 bucks . all kinds of amp emulations and effects built in. i also like it because it does what my vox ad120 does but i can carry it in a small briefcase when go to my friends to jam . i just hook it up to the pa
i can also emulate my twin reverb with it .
bottom line is you may be able to get close but you really cant get tube sound without a real tube inline somewhere.
my personal amp emuation preferences are fender twin reverb and vox ac30 tb in that order
the guys to get some real good info on here are merlin crusty and chris blackwell. there all really up on there stuff. ![]()
amx05462 wrote:
thanks for the mention to merlin
first of all you cant really go by computer speakers. if anything when listening to your audio off the computer get a real good set of headphones. computer speakers are not meant to duplicate the sound of ant true amp.
secondly if you want to get less of a digital sound you need to get something with an actual tube in it in my opinion. what i use is an older vox tonelab. just my preferance then you may want to experement with the actual tube in the unit. some tubes are warmer than others you can go to there web site and theres some info there about different tubes in there pedals. mines a desk top. t hey also have two floor models. they have just recently come out with a more compact model with a volume peddle attatched i dont need that as i have an old vox wah which i put a crossover to use it as a volume or wah depending on what i need at the time you can get the one i got off ebay usually around 100 bucks . all kinds of amp emulations and effects built in. i also like it because it does what my vox ad120 does but i can carry it in a small briefcase when go to my friends to jam . i just hook it up to the pa
i can also emulate my twin reverb with it .
bottom line is you may be able to get close but you really cant get tube sound without a real tube inline somewhere.
my personal amp emuation preferences are fender twin reverb and vox ac30 tb in that order
the guys to get some real good info on here are merlin crusty and chris blackwell. there all really up on there stuff.
Hi AMX and you're very welcome as I respect your thought as well as the others you mentioned.
With that said - I respectfully have to disagree abit with some of the things you said. Obviously I have NOT A SINGLE opposite thing to say about any of your advice about actually using tubes to get the true tube sound. However, I think that to be fair - I have to say that My computer speaker system is as good as any Home stereo 5.1 system. Those are what I Master all of my recordings with and it is not as cheesy as most cheap computer stereo speakers that ARE indeed horrible. So a little leeway needs to be given based on the speaker system connected to the computer.
The other bit is that I have found that at least regarding my Vetta and many MONTHS of constant tweaking and more tweaking I have most of my patches that sound very "tube-like". What I've found is most significant is the overall volume players use to set up their patches. I've seen first hand that most players set up their patches at home in a quiet environment at much lower volumes than they actually perform at. This in turn causes them to usually put too much high end into a patch or perhaps too much low end because at low volumes all of these things sound differently than at reasonably loud performance volumes. I've given master classes on just this topic with both solid state and tube amps. It's always met with the exact same skepticism when I talk about the midrange. Most usually have some stupid smiley face type of EQ settings and think that is a great sound. Perhaps for thrash metal or hardcore punk, but after I explain to them that MOST of the guitars range of sound is IN the Midrange, they still look at me funny until I set up a patch at low volume that they all hate. Then I turn it up to a performance volume and the tone balances out and NOW they are all impressed.
So the point to all of that is that the use of mids in the context of amp models CAN give a very warm "tube-like" sound without ever using real tubes. If anyone ever wants some of my patches that match what I've said, please just ask and I'll be happy to share them.
Sorry if any of what I just typed is already known and understood well by any readers on here, but some are still unaware of this problem/solution.
i couldnt agree with you more merlin accept im going under the assumption that you have a pro setup on your computer as you do everything to the highest of standards . what i was thinking was exactly that . but not knowing what kind of speaker system warhert has i made the assumption that it may not be a high end monitor setup which would tend to take away from his overall sound . so thats why i mentioned headphones as opposed to speakers. one thing with a good quality set of headphones and i mean the full ear coverage kind is they tend to eliminate any ambient room backround noise because the sound is in a captured area between the speaker and your ear. good point about the eq too your right on the money as always about the standard smiley face setting. i see that quite often.
on another subject what do you think of the jimi hendrix pedal digitech put out and the jamvox setup. im currently looking into both ![]()
As always I appreciate you understanding what I'm trying my best to say. I wish I could do it in less words as Rich R. seems to want everything. 48 years of walking this planet and I still can't simply say "yep" or "nope" to most questions. Oh well - I think it's what happens when you have a full-blooded Italian Mom. LOL Good thing none of you guys can see my hand gestures as I'm reading those silly posts that pop up from time to time. FAGETTABOUTIT Knose What I Means?? !!! ![]()
About the items you mentioned - I honestly am NOT a tech "*****" as I might seem to be. I honestly NEVER used more than a Morley Wah and a Memory Man Delay for nearly all of my playing. Even growing up with Jimmy (I NEED A PHASER ON EVERYTHING) Page, I never used to even use one of those. Just simply plug and play with my LP & a Marshall Plexi 50w w/8x10 Cabinet. Boy, I sure miss that rig!!
I certainly can check them out if you'd like me to and give you my thoughts?? Let me know, ok?
Take care,
Neal
yes if you could do that id apreciate it as i respect your opinion highly
by the way i can get pretty long winded my self nothing wrong with saying what you got to say. i do the hand gestures myself as my moms side is from sicily and my dads side is portuguese so i hardly can say hello with out making some kind of hand gesture ![]()
i just think rich is starting to get worn down a bit is all. seems like hes going 24/7 on his project thats why ive cut back on that area and only make a responce when i think is necessary.
you have to admit there is alot of repeditivity ( i think thats a word ) in that thread.so that would tend to make anyone try to keep it short and fresh.
i even thought just for laughs to mention atomic power instead of batterys just to break the tension. like with that guitar photo.
but he does need to realise all this other conversation about pods etc has bearing on the new guitar. by the way did you catch my bit about the headstock logo?
Nope - I guess I missed it? What did he say?
its back a page or two but i didnt get a reply from rich yet . he might have had enough that day or maybe it got passed over. btw. i didnt get a chance to ride today its rained once already but hres a pic of what i ride when im out there
the front kinda looks like that bike in the jimi hendrix photo accept his is older and hasnt got a shock absorber.
Nice ride sir!! I wrote ya back about the JamVox. Ok - I gotta get doing some music or I'll never get my stuff done and I'll be in deep S.... Oh well you know.
See ya later,
Neal
Hey guys, great idea for a Group! As soon as I saw Video, I had to join!! ![]()
The easiest way to get a POD to sound "real" is to use cab sims or convolutions and a compressor. I use them all the time with my PODxt bean (yes, xt) and they sound really good! If you are not familiar with the whole cab sim routine, I'll break it down for ya...
First, download the VST here... http://making-music.blogspot.com/2007/04/piotr-pyrzanowski-kefir-pcfree.html
Next download some cab sims here... http://www.ultimatemetal.com/forum/production-tips/494006-impulse-response-samples.html#post8272271
Make a folder on your desktop and label it "Cab Sims". Open your recording software and load the VST keFir into it. When you open an audio track, open the VST and then "load" it with one of the cab sims from your folder. You can keep the POD cabs (A.I.R.) on or off, try it both ways. You should be hearing the guitar with the new sound. If one doesn't sound good try another. There are a LOT of free cab sims on the net, you just gotta look for them.
Lastly, I use the Simple Squeeze compressor from here... http://www.betabugsaudio.com/plugs.php
I usually run it at noon or 1 o'clock. Gives the sims some meat! You'll be surprised how much of a difference it makes. The Line6 sims aren't really that good.
That's pretty much it. Have fun!
cgtrox ![]()
Stay in the mix and in the know.
Latest offers, special deals and insider updates.