Skip navigation
23001 Views 96 Replies Latest reply: May 28, 2011 8:08 PM by zo2u2 RSS
Karl_Houseknecht Expert Line 6 User 3,732 posts since
Jan 25, 2007
Currently Being Moderated

Oct 15, 2009 8:13 AM

MKII 112 - Second Impressions

I just got done giving the stock amp a good run through at volume.  Here's what my ear is hearing:

 

This is not simply a MKI with better effects, which are great by the way and a far cry better than the MKI.  The amp models have been reworked, and in some cases, drastically.  In general, the tone controls seem to have even more effect on most models.  Almost every model, at volume, has been rid of the icepick highs that were, to my ears, the overall character of the MKI with the V30.  This has been replaced with a slightly added emphasis on the midrange.  I wish I had a stock MKI to compare this to side by side, so I am just going from memory.  But to me the difference is very noticable.  In fact, the V30 can get downright honky at higher settings of the mid control.  The low end can still get flubby/farty on the wrong settings, so that could stand some tightening up.  I'm still going to go with a G12K-100 which should tighten the low end and smooth out any extreme mid honk.  Also, the springs on my tube retainers rattle unmercilessly against the glass when I strike my open D string.  They're going to come off.

 

Specifics about amp models that have changed:

 

The Metal Blue, which has long been a staple of mine for higher gain Marshall type tones, has changed.  Depending on your perspective, for the better or worse.  The mid control, which changes the distortion character from a more focused class A type tone at min, to a more modern high gain tone at mid, to a loose fuzz tone at max, is far more sensitive than it was on the MKI and has increased range. Also note, it seems to me that the description of the mid control is reversed in the manual because it says the exact opposite of what I just did.  The gain range is also expanded in both directions.  Now, pretty much anything before noon results in what sounds to me like a JCM800 at moderate gain.  Very punchy and smooth with a restrained top end.  The tone starts getting some hair on it as you increase the drive  to 12:00.  To me, the gain is unusable much past 1:00 with a hot bridge humbucker.  I was initially very disappointed with this model in some respects because in essence, my go-to tone wasn't to be found here anymore, but at least there was new territory that sounded very good.

 

Then I started stepping out of my box.  Insane Blue.  It's not quite so insane anymore.  Again, expanded range on the gain control.  On the MKI, anything but minimum gain resulted in screaming distortion.  Not so on the MKII.  Up to about 10:30 or so it was still very manageable.  And guess what?  My Metal Blue tone is here now.  In the Insane Blue model.  But it sounds even better because there's a usable mid control.  I'd experimented with Insane Blue on both MKI's to no avail.  But on the MKII this is now a usable model for me.  Nay, not just usable.  Really great sounding.  The gain range makes it suitable for everything from a nice rock crunch to metal territory.  And SMOOTH.  This has singing lead qualities if you want them.  There's hair here, but it is GOOD hair.  Moderate, usable sizzle.  Not fizz.  I am really digging Insane Blue.

 

Metal Amber?  Insane Amber?  On the MKI, I could tolerate these with the K-100 but not with the V30.  Icepicky mess there.  But on the MKII these seem to have lost the icepick just as all the other models have and have a usable top end even at higher treble settings.  Actually, I could get into these tones also, more so the Metal Amber.  That model with single coils has a nice glassy crunch.

 

Crunch Amber naturally has that Plexi bark...duh.  With gain at 12 or below, it is very articulate.  Raking a chord, you can hear every note clearly but still have a great crunch going on.  I think Eric Johnson or Joe Bonamassa.  Good tones to be had here also.  Although both this model and the Hi Gain Amber sound maybe just a little too barky/honky with the V30.  The K-100 will put this back where I like it.

 

I'm not going to dwell on the mid gain stuff other than to say that the AC30TB sounds great (Class A Amber), maybe even better than the MKI did.  There are some other new offerings there too that sound good, but I will have to explore later.

 

Cleans are fantastic.  I don't know if it's me, but I think the Clean Amber has been reworked because it now sounds a lot more like the clean sounds I was getting from the MKI on Crunch Amber at low gain.  I could play that clean sound for days.  Very enjoyable.

 

To wind up here, I still have a lot of work to do but I think the MKII may be a keeper.  We'll see for sure what happens after the speaker change but I don't know any other amps in this range that have it going on on so many different fronts at the same time.  Effects are really good, amp models sound great, and it's a single package.  For under $1000 what else is there?  Vypyr?  Sorry, not in the same league.  Will post again after the speaker change, and I might even include some video footage.  Until next time!

  • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 8:23 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    Karl: I should of waited 10 minutes to post my questions to your first MKII thread... I'll be waiting to hear any other info about the MKII. Thinking...

    Thanks for reporting back to us all so quickly. Your latest info leans me back towards the MKII and away from the Marshall Haze 40watt... Sigh. I have till the 20th to make a decision...

     

    Thanks!

  • fester2000 Iknowathingortwo 1,050 posts since
    Oct 30, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 8:30 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    Another great review from the Houseknecht-meister!  Dang, I really wish I had the cash to pick up the HD100mkII and a good Avatar cab to go with it.  Not that I'm complaining, of course -- my new toys are supposed to be delivered today!!!

     

    Cheers,

     

    Fester2k

    • fester2000 Iknowathingortwo 1,050 posts since
      Oct 30, 2006
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 15, 2009 8:56 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      Karl_Houseknecht wrote:

       

      So, further playing at volume...I'm getting a buzz/rattle from the back of the cab even after taking the tube retainer springs off.  Pushing my hand against the middle of the baffle in the back gets rid of it for the most part.  I tried turning screws a little tighter but it still buzzes.  I'm starting to wonder about this 3/4 closed design.  If it can't handle the bass from a V30, it sure won't handle the K-100.  Hmmm.

       

      Amp sounds lovely in all other respects.

      More support for the HD100mkII, eh? 

       

      Cheers,

       

      Fester2k

  • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
    Jan 25, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 9:10 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    Good review bro, no surprise there and thanks man. I am gonna go play one this weekend and check the Divided by Thirteen model. Good to hear they fied the icepick thing, now I really wanna hear this thing in person!

     

    cgtrox

  • spaceatl Expert Line 6 User 4,456 posts since
    Jan 24, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 2:11 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    Nice review...Dang it, I just knew this amp was going to rock!

    • guitfiddler Just Startin' 41 posts since
      Apr 21, 2007
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 15, 2009 3:50 PM (in response to spaceatl)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      That's a great initial review Karl, sorry about your problem with the rattle. Hopefully you just got a bad one. Do you notice an increase in low end or more say "cabinet coloration" from the 3/4 closed back? I'm really glad to hear they've resolved the "ice pick" issue. I've done some mods just like a lot of you but never really got rid of that to my liking. The better overall tone and amp models is what will really sell me on the MKII as opposed to the effects. Better efx will just be icing on the cake! NOW I WANT ONE!!!! 

        • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
          Jan 24, 2007
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 15, 2009 5:13 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          I know this may not help because I have the HD100 MKII but I get no rattle other than windows because its insanely loud even between 30-50% volume.

           

          One thing I did notice about some of the gain models is that riffs are very clear and punchy but sometimes the chords sound mushy or too saggy but Im still playing with different tones I've had to work so much lately I haven't had a chance to do much other than go through all the presets once and then dink around with some of the new models.

           

          I did note that it is much easier and quicker to dial in "that" gotcha kinda tone where you say whoa thats nice ...also the sustain seems to have been improved glad I traded now to sell gear.

  • nprenger Just Startin' 82 posts since
    Jul 25, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 6:19 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    So... Has anybody cracked one open to see if the Strymon SVpre will drop in?

     

    nprenger

  • guitfiddler Just Startin' 41 posts since
    Apr 21, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 6:29 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    I'm also curious if they reworked any part of the power section. Wondering if this could have something to do with less ice pick as well. I did notice the master volume and presence controls are reversed. Not that this means much but they obviously did a bit of redesigning even if that's all it was.

    • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
      Jan 24, 2007
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 15, 2009 6:41 PM (in response to guitfiddler)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      Or it could be they reversed them because when adjusting delay a few moments ago I had to spin preset edit nob and accidentally bumped presence nob to a point that would've awoken corpses in a cemetery a few miles away had it been the master volume I had hit.

       

      By the way I'm not just in love with both new high gain models but both Insane models too ....Amber punch n crunch and blue smooth beefy with bite ...and it does seem as if they dialed back the levels of gain a tad which is fine who needs Insane with max gain?

  • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
    Jan 25, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 15, 2009 7:58 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    I did get to play one today, the 112. I didn't have a lot of time with it but it really is different. I didn't even tap the effects, I was only after the amp models for now. I quickly spun thru the presets one time, they did fix the levels, whew! I landed on one with a very nice thick and beefy clean tone, it sounded like an old school Hiwatt 100 cranked but still squeaky clean. Very nice! Then I just went to the user presets and hit the Hi Gain amp, hmmm. Maybe I'm just used to the SV Pre but I wasn't getting as much saturation or bite, or maybe it was different kind of bite? Just not as agressive? Hard to explain, but it isn't something that I couldn't get right now on my SV set to ORANGE. Maybe cuz of the SV Pre? I can't remember if it was Blue or Amber but it was different. Then I tried one of the Mesas, very big, very fat low end! Not really a fan of that sound anyway. I wish I had the menu of amps with me so I could see what I'm supposed to be hearing. They did fix the cab a little, no more ice pick. In fact, maybe that's what I'm missing here, is it a fix or a miss? I couldn't really hear as good as I wanted to, some kid a few amps down was attempting to play a Metallica song, LOUDLY. I'm off tomorrow so I am gonna take it into the PA room in the back and crank it a little and write down the amps so I'll know where I'm at. Another thing I did notice was the amp does react better with the guitar volume. I guess they did do some work on the JFET. As far as getting one, hmmm. I really like my SV right now and I can get any sound I heard (or even better) on it vs. the MKII I played today as far as amps go. I mean, I already have all of my sounds down. But, in all fairness I have to go deeper on this thing. The only plus I see right now would be having the effects built-in and just having to use my shortboard! Man this is killing me!!! So close but yet so far.....

     

    cgtrox

    • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
      Jul 26, 2008
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 15, 2009 9:14 PM (in response to cgtrox)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      So I got my new mkii 212 home, and have been using it all night.  I've been attempting to recreate my custom tones from my current SV 212 on the mkii.  So far, I can only get the cleaner tones to sound as good or better.  All of the higher gain models aren't as pleasing.  I spent lots of time at GC with the new amp, and enjoyed it there.  However, I just can't get the sounds out of the higher gain models that I get from my original SV.  It sucks too, because the other models, new effects, and extra controls are just great.

       

      Karl mentioned that his signature tone from the metal blue on the original SV can't be recreated using the same model on the mkii.  Same situation for me.  He said he found a great tone from the insane blue to replace it, but I can't get what I need out of it.

       

      I'm gonna give it a few more days, but I'll be taking it back if I can't get my custom sounds, which I use almost daily, to sound as good as they do on the original SV.

       

      Here's a sample of my blue metal sound from the original, trying to recreate that sound on the MKii, and a stereo sample of them both.  I use a fender tele on the bridge pickup.  Notice how the original has so much more 'life' in the tone.  Also, the sound of the guitar really shines through.  The mkii seems to be very flat and generic sounding.  The tone of the guitar feels like it's taken completely out.  I have the treble setting higher on the mkii than the original as well.  Both sounds were recorded using the direct outs (studio).

      Attachments:
      • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
        Apr 20, 2009
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 15, 2009 11:14 PM (in response to jws1982)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        Thanks for posting the clips... nice progression. I'd have to say better keep the Mark I... I really got negative pleasure from the MK II clip's tone. I'm really thinking about braving the Haze 40 Watt. My SV MK1 112 sounds good (with an HT Dual pedal in front) but it's just not got "it". Based on your excellent comparison clips, the MK II might not have "it" either!

      • mtrash14 Iknowathingortwo 539 posts since
        Feb 18, 2009
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 16, 2009 4:05 AM (in response to jws1982)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        jws1982 wrote:

         

        So I got my new mkii 212 home, and have been using it all night.  I've been attempting to recreate my custom tones from my current SV 212 on the mkii.  So far, I can only get the cleaner tones to sound as good or better.  All of the higher gain models aren't as pleasing.  I spent lots of time at GC with the new amp, and enjoyed it there.  However, I just can't get the sounds out of the higher gain models that I get from my original SV.  It sucks too, because the other models, new effects, and extra controls are just great.

         

        Karl mentioned that his signature tone from the metal blue on the original SV can't be recreated using the same model on the mkii.  Same situation for me.  He said he found a great tone from the insane blue to replace it, but I can't get what I need out of it.

         

        I'm gonna give it a few more days, but I'll be taking it back if I can't get my custom sounds, which I use almost daily, to sound as good as they do on the original SV.

         

        Here's a sample of my blue metal sound from the original, trying to recreate that sound on the MKii, and a stereo sample of them both.  I use a fender tele on the bridge pickup.  Notice how the original has so much more 'life' in the tone.  Also, the sound of the guitar really shines through.  The mkii seems to be very flat and generic sounding.  The tone of the guitar feels like it's taken completely out.  I have the treble setting higher on the mkii than the original as well.  Both sounds were recorded using the direct outs (studio).

         

        Nice playing.  Thanks for putting up the sample clips!!!  

         

        I say take the MKII back.  Far better tone from the original (IMO).

         

        Again, thanks for the comparison.

         

        MT

        • lenunez2 Just Startin' 17 posts since
          May 13, 2006
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 16, 2009 5:38 AM (in response to mtrash14)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          Just goes to show how subjective tone is. I preferred the MkII clips. To me, the top end of the original seemed a little fizzy/harsh.

          • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
            Jan 24, 2007
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 16, 2009 6:04 AM (in response to lenunez2)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            LOL ... ya me too ..the MKII sound tighter and thicker ..punchier and more musically appealing to the ear probably to the change in high mids that seems to be the change those who are playing there's are noticing.

             

            The original sounded crunchier but I notice, (though I don't know JWS's exact settings) that I can get closer to his original tone by removing a touch of treble and instead increasing Presence ...it adds a different kind of brightness that gets that crunch that on some amp models you just cant acheive using the treble knob. But I found that to be true of the first SV as well ... but then perhaps it could be do to me using the HD100 MKII with a Line 6 4x12 who knows?

             

            Of course the problem with increasing presence is its universal which means all other tones would have to adapt to new presence setting ...

             

            Either way I'm in love with my MKII and can't wait for MF to ship my UX1 so I can check out recordings via the XLR out.

             

            BTW has anyone else tried using backwards delay with IH smart harmony? Lol wow talk about bizarre very fun.

      • phil_m Expert Line 6 User 4,243 posts since
        Jan 25, 2007
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 16, 2009 6:01 AM (in response to jws1982)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        It's not really quite fair to compare the sound of a brand new amp with brand spankin' new speakers to an amp that's several years old with speakers with significant playing time on them, is it?  It seems to me that some of the missing "life" you're talking about could easily be attributed to the speakers not being broken in.

        • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
          Jan 24, 2007
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 16, 2009 6:12 AM (in response to phil_m)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          He used direct outs and there's a differance but that's a good point to take into consideration.

           

          BTW JWS that was a nice progression and actually the two tones sound nice together.

           

          I had my wife listen and she like the MKII better as well ...so who knows ..???

          • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
            Jul 26, 2008
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 16, 2009 6:41 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            Yeah, 'life' is a pretty generic tone description.  What I mean is that the original tone feels like it has more volume dynamics, more layers, and more transparency.  The MKii tone, to me, feels lacking in these three areas.

             

            I don't remember my exact settings right now, but they're somewhere close to this.  Presence doesn't affect the tone of the direct outs in studio mode.

             

            Original:     Blue Metal, Drive - 2:00, Bass - 12:30, Mid - 2:00, Treble - 9:30, Reverb: 8:30

            MKii:     Blue Metal, Drive - 2:00, Bass - 12:30, Mid - 2:30 Treble - 12:00, Reverb: 8:30 (plate)

             

            And yep, the MKii speakers are about as stiff as possible right now, though I used the direct out for the recordings earlier.  I'm going to run the MKii pre-amp to the power amp and speakers of my original tonight, and vice versa, to see what happens.   Should be interesting.  If I get some time tonight to turn it up loud, I'll post some mic'ed clips.

             

            Anyone have a specific patch or tone you want to hear/compare?

      • pikeral Just Startin' 126 posts since
        Feb 5, 2009
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 16, 2009 8:19 PM (in response to jws1982)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        I like the mkii clip. The section of the riff that is picked sounds more definitive and the chording section is smooth and natural sounding. The original sounds a little thin and more harsh, (IMHO). Nice riff btw. How about some clip comparison's of Insane Amber? thx for sharing

        • fester2000 Iknowathingortwo 1,050 posts since
          Oct 30, 2006
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 16, 2009 8:42 PM (in response to pikeral)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          pikeral wrote:

           

          I like the mkii clip. The section of the riff that is picked sounds more definitive and the chording section is smooth and natural sounding. The original sounds a little thin and more harsh, (IMHO). Nice riff btw. How about some clip comparison's of Insane Amber? thx for sharing

          I assume you're referring to the SM57 only clip.  If so, I wholeheartedly agree it is way, way better than the SV mk I sm57 clip. 

           

          Cheers,

           

          Fester2k

        • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
          Jul 26, 2008
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 16, 2009 10:19 PM (in response to pikeral)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          Here you go.  Insane Amber.  Drive at 75% on the mkii, 50% on the original.  Everything else at noon, no effects. The individual tracks are raw from the direct outs.  The stereo track with both samples has a 4th-order high-pass at 85Hz and some gentle compression.  MKii is on the left.

           

          Guitar is a Gibson Les Paul Traditional Pro, bridge pickup (BurstBucker 3).

          Attachments:
            • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
              Jan 24, 2007
              Currently Being Moderated
              Oct 17, 2009 6:49 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
              Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

              Same: MkII clip to my ears sounds tighter and more pleasing to the ear almost as if the muddy lows and harsh highs have been filtered by harbal eq lol (for those familiar with this mastering eq) ...

               

              I toyed around with Red Compression last night and you can get more "pronounced" for lack of a better term voicings that the highs seem to do with the SVMKI by increasing the sensitivity to around %50. Still experimenting but I like the setting that way for now.

          • Insidian Just Startin' 349 posts since
            Jan 24, 2007
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 17, 2009 6:37 AM (in response to jws1982)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            MKII definitely takes it on that one, for sure.

             

             

          • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
            Apr 20, 2009
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 17, 2009 9:16 AM (in response to jws1982)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            I guess somebody's got to be the heretic... tone is SO subjective as someone else said... I'm listening to this stuff on a nice clean Onkyo power amp and a pair of Klipsch near field monitors... It's what I use to master with. I use the Klipsches because I'm old and I've lost a bit of high frequency hearing over the years, and these are a slightly brighter-than-flat set of monitors... helps with the loss so I don't send out a project that's hissy or scratchy.

             

            When I listen to "Original_Direct.mp3", then I listen to "MKii_Direct.mp3", it's like a graphic eq was used to remove a scoop somewhere around 2-3K.

            You can simulate this yourself, put both clips in "now playing" in Media Player, enable the Graphic EQ, set the clips to alternate and loop, then just turn the EQ off when the MKII clip is playing, and on when the MKI "Original" is playing... it's far from exact, if you have other software you can do this much more exactly, but you'll get the idea and really quickly if you try this method of comparison.

            This is also true when you try this with the sm57 clips.

             

            To my ancient ears, the MKII clips in comparison sound somewhat nasal and thin, and still "scratchy" which is kind of a characterisic of Line6 stuff in general. With my hearing, if it seems "scratchy" to me, it almost MUST be so!

             

            I'm not viewing this as an improvement in any way... I'd love to get one and be able to use the Midi and the deep editing of the effects, but the FOR ME (YMMV here), the tone simply isn't there. I'll possibly keep my SV MI 112, but I'm now really serious about trying a Marshall 40 watt Haze.

             

            My total THANK YOUS to all who've taken the time to share their impressions and sound clips with us and with me. You've saved me at least return shipping costs if not a whole lot of frustration!!

             

            Les

          • pikeral Just Startin' 126 posts since
            Feb 5, 2009
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 17, 2009 9:20 AM (in response to jws1982)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            jws1982 crank that 212 up. See if there are any issue's with the back of the cab rattling and making noise? I'm thinking if Karl's was a dud and your's is fine, i might need some GAS money.

              • pikeral Just Startin' 126 posts since
                Feb 5, 2009
                Currently Being Moderated
                Oct 17, 2009 9:33 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                Don't forget, mine was a 112.  212 could be totally different.

                Good catch Karl. I would be going for the 212 however.

              • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
                Jul 26, 2008
                Currently Being Moderated
                Oct 17, 2009 12:07 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                Oh, I have cranked it many times. It's held together great so far. The back 3/4 cover is held in by 5 screws, but it also seems to be glued in.  I removed the screws, but could not get the cover off without feeling like I was going to break it.  I'm still in limbo over switching to the mkii, so I'm not going to do anything potentially destructive yet.

                 

                On an interesting note, i ran the mkii pre to the amp/speakers of 2 different original 212's, and they sounded quite a bit better than the mkii's.  The original's pre to the mkii power/speakers sounded worse.  I tested it at low and high volumes with the same results.  The bass response from the original amp/cab using the mkii pre felt just right in my studio room.  The mkii amp/speakers sounded more harsh and dull.  Of course, this can still be attributed to speakers not broken in or tube differences.

            • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
              Jan 25, 2007
              Currently Being Moderated
              Oct 17, 2009 9:54 AM (in response to pikeral)
              Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

              I gotta tell you, the MKII 112 that I played vibrated like a mutha! That was with the master at about 9:00!! That new 3/4 design works for speaker efficiency (sounds great), but may be a double edged sword. Cuz it will loosen everything and anything within a three foot radius, seriously! I used to have a 100W Hiwatt bulldog 112 combo and it was loud! It had the open back like the original SV. But it didn't vibrate like this MKII does. It was as heavy as a ship anchor but it didn't vibrate like that. Maybe cab design or materials?

               

              cgtrox

                • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
                  Jan 25, 2007
                  Currently Being Moderated
                  Oct 17, 2009 10:07 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                  Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                  Yup, same here bro. Master at 9:00 and channel volume at 1:00 or 2:00. Of course, I would like to play it in a real live band situation but even at that volume, it really should vibrate as violently as it did.

                   

                  cgtrox

                • fester2000 Iknowathingortwo 1,050 posts since
                  Oct 30, 2006
                  Currently Being Moderated
                  Oct 17, 2009 11:01 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                  Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                  Karl_Houseknecht wrote:

                   

                  cgtrox wrote:

                   

                  I gotta tell you, the MKII 112 that I played vibrated like a mutha! That was with the master at about 9:00!! That new 3/4 design works for speaker efficiency (sounds great), but may be a double edged sword.

                   

                  I was afraid of this.  That's two independent confirmations of this phenomenon.  Yes, my master was at 9:00 also.  With the channel volume at about 2:00.

                  Very concerning -- I hope this is either an isolated incident (seems unlikely) or L6  can figure out how to get this fixed, and fast, b/c it looks like they've otherwise got an amazing package.

                   

                  Cheers,

                   

                  Fester2k

                    • Mcgill Just Startin' 338 posts since
                      Jan 25, 2007
                      Currently Being Moderated
                      Oct 17, 2009 1:10 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                      Karl?  I do not know if you are willing to experiment?

                       

                       

                      Can you take the 3/4 panel off, (Open it up baby!! )  then see if you get this same "Effect" ?

                       

                      I´m thinking that its the added vibration, or the Panel itself?

                          • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
                            Jan 25, 2007
                            Currently Being Moderated
                            Oct 18, 2009 4:38 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                            Told ya man, I could barely read the amp models on the front! That's about gig level for me, maybe just a little louder. That doesn't take away from the fact that I really liked those two amp models when I played it, I hope they can fix this. Like fester said, it is a great package.

                             

                            cgtrox  

                          • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
                            Jan 24, 2007
                            Currently Being Moderated
                            Oct 18, 2009 7:17 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                            Hmmm... that sucks I imagine they must surely be acting to correct this asap?

                             

                            I haven't had any issues yet with the HD100 MKII (obviously vibration wouldn't be an issue since it isn't a combo) although I coulda swore once when playing loud I heard it start to fade out for a second kinda like the opposite of how it sounds if you turn an amp on and take it off standby to quick and the volume fades in only this was a fade out:

                             

                            But it was, if it did happen, it was so quick I wasn't sure what had happened or if it even had now lol. It scared me at first and I tried to replicate it but it never did happen again so maybe it was just my mind playing tricks on me??

                            • ryanpaul Just Startin' 17 posts since
                              Oct 31, 2008
                              Currently Being Moderated
                              Oct 19, 2009 3:11 PM (in response to Apologist)
                              Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                              Same with me, I havent had any problems with the head, There are some AWESOME things you can find with the different amp models. Both Class A amp models and both Crunch and Hi Gain Models I have found good uses for. And I still havent had tons of time to tweak. It seems like the models are alot more distinct than the Mk1. And the effects are really great too. I think this might become my only gigging amp for awhile unless some I find some terrible flaw. One thing that does suck is the non-ability to back up patches. Hopefully they will fix that

          • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
            Jan 25, 2007
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 17, 2009 9:44 AM (in response to jws1982)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            It does sound like they fixed the Direct Out, good! MKII hands down there.

             

            cgtrox

    • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
      Apr 20, 2009
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 16, 2009 5:48 AM (in response to cgtrox)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      That's kind of funny, CGTROX, I used the phrase "So close yet so far" in a private email to Karl at close to the same time, discussing the MKII, apparently other people feel that way based on the sound samples and responses in this thread. Karl has some interesting real experience re: the MKII. I'll defer to him.

      I'm really interested in your take on this amp; I don't think I'll be hearing one around here soon.

      • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
        Jan 25, 2007
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 16, 2009 7:09 AM (in response to bonedaddio)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        I'm going back in today to GC and focus on a few amp models only. More than likely I'm gonna keep my original SV with the SV Pre in it. I'm getting that spongy, chewy compressed distortion that I love so much with it. Also gets that VH "glass clink" in there that makes it sound alive. I liked the MKII clip Jason posted up there but that's the direct out, at least that sounds better! I would like to hear a comparison of the Insane Blue models. Right now I'm using the Insane Blue with the drive set very low and the SV Pre set on ORANGE. That's my main lead and rythm heavy sound. Like I said, I already have all of my sounds down with the SV the way it is. Which is why I wanna try to see if I can duplicate it on the MKII with no mods.

         

        I'm goin' in....

         

        cgtrox

        • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
          Jul 26, 2008
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 16, 2009 5:55 PM (in response to cgtrox)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          Here's samples of the AC30 models from each spider valve.  All controls are set to noon. No reverb/effects.  Mic'ed clips are using an SM57 close-mic'ed slightly off-axis (~20 degrees).  Direct out clips have the MKii set to Studio.

           

          Both of these models sound very good.  Notice how the MKii model has some compression built-in.

          Attachments:
  • pikeral Just Startin' 126 posts since
    Feb 5, 2009
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 17, 2009 9:14 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    I'm hearing alot better sonic's coming from the mkii clips. It's too bad the baffle was shaking like that. A friend of mine just returned his SV 4/12 cab due to some serious farting issues, the jack's were popping out of the cab at gig volume, 12 o'clock w/HD100.

      • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
        Jan 25, 2007
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 17, 2009 10:29 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        Big +1 on Avatar cabs, best bang for the buck on cabs. But, if you wanna "tune" your sealed cab from farting issues try this...

        bogner-2x12-cabinet-Speakers_01.jpg

         

        it really helps with the backlash of sound waves from multiple speaker sealed cabs. It's only a 1/4 of foam you can buy at a fabric store then stapled to the back.

         

        cgtrox

    • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
      Jan 25, 2007
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 17, 2009 10:01 AM (in response to pikeral)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      Dude! Now that I remember, I would place my hand over the guitar input jack (with the cord still in) and feel some air being pushed out of it! I was palm muting an open E with my right and placing my left hand over it and there was air being pushed out! That was powerful...

       

      cgtrox

      • cgtrox Expert Line 6 User 1,638 posts since
        Jan 25, 2007
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 17, 2009 6:42 PM (in response to cgtrox)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        Yes, I did go back and play one. I only focused on the Clean and Insane models which are what I use on my MKI. I have to say, I absolutely fell in love with the Clean Blue! What a great big round clean tone! Very nice job there Line 6! It doesn't really get dirty at all and stays clean no matter how loud you get. Then I went to my "go to" sound on Insane Blue. I really liked this one a lot, too. It sounded very close to mine with the SV Pre, very clear! One thing I did notice is the gain, I could crank it all the way up still stand right in front of it, hmmm. Maybe they backed off so the effects can be added? I have the gain on mine at about 10:00 if I go further it's really insane! Like I said, I can get all of the sounds I heard on the new one with my old one. So, it looks like I'm getting the M9 for effects and be done for now.

         

        ...and the chase goes on

         

        cgtrox

  • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
    Jul 6, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 22, 2009 9:47 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    I was Finally able to sit down and put this amp up louder, and what do you know? the dreaded Buzz from the back of the 112.... .UGHHHH

  • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
    Jul 6, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 22, 2009 12:10 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    screws are tight. i even removed the tube casing but that didnt help. its the backboard of the amp rattling away.....when i press it, it stops vibrating.

      • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
        Jul 6, 2006
        Currently Being Moderated
        Oct 22, 2009 12:42 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

        i called and i have a ticket open with them so i'm having them send me another one to try but based on your posts, it prob won't make a difference. I'm hopeing it does though cause its a keeper if you ask me, i like it alot more that the SV1.

        • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
          Jul 6, 2006
          Currently Being Moderated
          Oct 22, 2009 12:43 PM (in response to guitargman)
          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

          forgot to mention that when i hold the back panel it stops..

          • halebob Just Startin' 2 posts since
            Jul 30, 2007
            Currently Being Moderated
            Oct 23, 2009 3:33 AM (in response to guitargman)
            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

            Hi , maybe you can put in a piece of wood from the frontside to the rearside with some screws to eliminate the vibrations?

            But for the 112 you must have 2 pieces of wood because the speaker is in the middle. That's simple but it works , I think.

            Greetings from Germany , Frank

              • halebob Just Startin' 2 posts since
                Jul 30, 2007
                Currently Being Moderated
                Oct 23, 2009 3:52 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                I'm wondering did Line6 make  no tryout themselves before selling the new product ?

              • Mcgill Just Startin' 338 posts since
                Jan 25, 2007
                Currently Being Moderated
                Oct 23, 2009 5:22 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                My Idea would be more like an I-Beam structure built onto the Back panel, and this only needs to be about 4 inches deep into the Amp!

                 

                I Braces for back panel.jpg

                 

                Fast free hand Drawing not using CAD. 

                  • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
                    Apr 20, 2009
                    Currently Being Moderated
                    Oct 23, 2009 6:11 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
                    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                    This is all good for the folks that already bought an SV 112 MkII and are insistent on keeping it, but I just don't get why I'd upgrade from a Mk1 to the SV 112 MkII for $700.00 and then have to fix a bad cabinet design (that apparently wasn't tested???!!) to get a playable amp; which DOES have awkward but deep editing of effects, but DOESN'T have editing software or allow patch backup, etc. etc. Draw your own conclusions.

                     

                    The members of this forum have provided (I've read it a lot) a tremendous amount of feedback, suggestions, work-arounds etc., a lot of it appears to have been ignored by the manufacturer. If they'd looked at the SvPre users, listened to the competition's amps (especially tube amps), done some kind of upgrade along these lines, they'd have an amp that people would fight to buy, they'd be (I'd be) selling their Mk1 and buying the new one immediately.

                     

                    Don't get me wrong, I like my SV112 Mk1 and don't plan to get rid of it, I've got it working nicely with a tube distortion pedal in front. BUT with a minimal design effort (like a built in SvPre preamp tube), this amp could really SOUND good. Put one side by side with a decent all tube amp (I'm using a relatively inexpensive Marshall Haze for this) and tell me that the SV sounds like it on any setting. Not. I'll provide clips at some point.

                     

                    My next fooling around session later today will be to use the SV112 as a powered extension cabinet for the Haze (Haze has two different outs, one emulated and one straight pre-amp out that can be used for this purpose... or I'll put my stereo chorus in the Haze effects loop (instrument level, so I can use my DL4 in it) and take the dry out to the SV, etc. etc.)

                     

                    Sorry for the rant, but as others have said, SO CLOSE, but yet SO FAR! The idea of having to fix the cabinet appears to just annoy me no end.

                    Just can't drink the Kool Aid on this one.

                     

                    Edit:

                    REALLY SORRY for thread hijacking, all. Too much coffee too early. Hope I have not offended.

                    • phil_m Expert Line 6 User 4,243 posts since
                      Jan 25, 2007
                      Currently Being Moderated
                      Oct 23, 2009 7:00 AM (in response to bonedaddio)
                      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                      If this truly is design flaw that affects a majority or all of the combos, I would expect Line 6 to address it in some way.  It's hard to imagine how it could have gotten by in a prototype, but it could be something as simple as the factory using a slightly different type of plywood for the back than what was originally used.  This strikes me as something that could be an example of aeroelastic flutter, where the resonant frequency of plywood is matching up with a prominent freqency coming out of the speaker.  I kind of doubt that it's simply from the sound pressure level alone that it's causing the vibration - although I suppose that could be a possibility.

                       

                      In any case, I would imagine that it will be taken care of in some way.

                      • spaceatl Expert Line 6 User 4,456 posts since
                        Jan 24, 2007
                        Currently Being Moderated
                        Oct 23, 2009 9:34 AM (in response to phil_m)
                        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                        aeroelastic flutter...

                         

                        That makes me wonder about sticking a thin dampening material to the inside of the cab...Seems like if the flutter is really internal to the ply itself, just throwing a towel in the bottom of the cab might be enough to dampen the flutter...That doesn't fix anything...or even prove where exactly the flutter is coming from...just thinking out loud...If after tightening everything and making sure the whole structure is rigid the flutter still happens and a towel in the bottom minimizes it, then I tend to think something is wrong with the wood itself...

                        • GoD_X Just Startin' 102 posts since
                          Mar 12, 2007
                          Currently Being Moderated
                          Oct 23, 2009 9:54 AM (in response to spaceatl)
                          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                          is this problems just with the 112?? anyone tried the 212 yet???

                          • jws1982 Iknowathingortwo 263 posts since
                            Jul 26, 2008
                            Currently Being Moderated
                            Oct 23, 2009 11:15 AM (in response to GoD_X)
                            Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                            My 212 doesn't have the issue.  However, neither did the 112 I tried in Guitar Center.  I jammed loud and long in the loud room on each one too.  The 112 definitely "shook" more while playing at volume, but didn't have any annoying rattles.  Both were straight out of the boxes when I tested them.

                            • GoD_X Just Startin' 102 posts since
                              Mar 12, 2007
                              Currently Being Moderated
                              Oct 23, 2009 12:04 PM (in response to jws1982)
                              Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                              can anyone else confirm the issue is just with the 112 and not the 212. i dont live in the US so i usually buy based on the forum input from you guys and youtube videos, i have the SV212mki but i want to buy the mk2 212.

                        • lenunez2 Just Startin' 17 posts since
                          May 13, 2006
                          Currently Being Moderated
                          Oct 23, 2009 12:23 PM (in response to spaceatl)
                          Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                          If resonant frequency vibration is at play, I would think that you might consider what it would take to alter the resonant frequency of the cab. I've been wrong plenty, but I'd be surprized if a towel is going to do much good. The resonant frequency is a function of the mass of the object (Just like your guitar string the thicker the string, the lower the pitch). Change the mass and it will resonate at a different frequency (provided that is the issue).

                           

                          As such, the non-destructive, simple test that I am proposing is to get yourself some wood clamps, and clamp something (another piece of wood, or flat piece of metal) to the back panel. The clamps need to be tight enough such that the cab feels like it the clamped on mass is part of the cab. The Mass needs to be big enough to make some appreciable difference in the resonant frequency.

                           

                          This same technique is used for suspension bridges whereby the wind can somtimes get the bridge resonating to the point that they want to shale themselves apart. Engineers go in an strategically add mass in certain points to change the resonant frequency such that the new resonanat frequency is something that is improbable. It's a lovely thought the next time you are crossing a high bridge :-)

                    • mtrash14 Iknowathingortwo 539 posts since
                      Feb 18, 2009
                      Currently Being Moderated
                      Oct 23, 2009 12:27 PM (in response to bonedaddio)
                      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                      Adding stiffeners (bracing) to the inside of the back panel I'd say will void the warranty so IMO that idea is out.  Removing the back panel, making a new panel to experiment with, then if the amp goes south replace it with the original and send it back.  That might work if you don't miss any of the screw holes and get caught.  

                       

                      -------

                       

                      And for you Tube Tone Snobs out there  (   I'm one too ), don't expect that real gutsy tube tone until L6 decides to get serious about tube amps.  The SV, IMO, does compete very well with the SS market and the lower priced tube amp market, but when you start pulling in the big boys.........>>>  

                       

                      Thats all I've got

                      MT

                      • bonedaddio Just Startin' 19 posts since
                        Apr 20, 2009
                        Currently Being Moderated
                        Oct 23, 2009 2:14 PM (in response to mtrash14)
                        Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

                        After reading the other more recent comments, I wonder if the grade of plywood used (or that batch or lot) is delaminating... as in the layers of wood aren't sticking together... as in bad materials, NOT bad design. After all, the backs on SV Mk ones don't do this...

                         

                        I've had a sheet or two of Marine plywood that came through like this.

  • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
    Jul 6, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 23, 2009 6:37 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    great ideas guys and it's nice to see some interest in this, but i'm gonna agree with bonedaddio and say that for this $$$ i'm not fixing a dam thing. I'll have them send me another one and see what happens. In then end, I'm hopeing for a good outcome.

    • Apologist Iknowathingortwo 638 posts since
      Jan 24, 2007
      Currently Being Moderated
      Oct 23, 2009 6:54 AM (in response to guitargman)
      Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

      Got the UX1 and it monitors the mic1 of the XLR out of HD100 very well but I did find that, at least while using stand alone application you could still only monitor 2 tones. Was hoping to do instrument input dual while monitoring input from mic as well but if it's possible I haven't figured it out yet.

       

      So I have a Pod Farm Tone on intrument input and Mic1 as SVHD100MKII input and it sounds killer.

       

      Was thinking of recording some snippets and posting them for your listening pleasure I may do it this weekend if I get a chance.

       

      Any requests for Amp Models or presets ..Swamp Throat and Arachnophopia are two good high gain presets but then I think in this instance Line 6 made some decent presets for a change ... at least they sound good to me. Just let me know what you'd like to hear and I'll see if I can swing it.

       

      My pedal board is still on back order which sucks though.

  • guitargman Just Startin' 30 posts since
    Jul 6, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Oct 23, 2009 10:37 AM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    I have another 112 on the way. unfortunatley, there suckass RMA policy is to get the return 1st, 3-4 day turnaround time, then prob shipped ground I'm looking at 2 plus weeks wihtout an amp. Nice, real nice. The new one will prob do the same thing based on what i've read on here. Tech support says they dont know about this problem but will try to duplicate it. SUX.

  • zo2u2 Just Startin' 2 posts since
    Nov 13, 2010
    Currently Being Moderated
    May 28, 2011 8:08 PM (in response to Karl_Houseknecht)
    Re: MKII 112 - Second Impressions

    My MK2 112 sounds great & no rattles...my other 2 guitarist both have MK1-2/12 & HD100 8/12 & my 112 hangs with them easily...I had the 2/12 but I hated lugging the thing around..traded it for the 112 model & never looked back..especially when we are done & it's time to move them....I am out the door first......

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)