Jump to content


Photo

Variax 2.0 Spank Bug ?


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

#41 1999

1999

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 02:57 AM

Try this to see if it will work for you guys.   You should be able to save it now. There is nowhere else to share, so I put it in my google drive.  Here is position 2 setting .

 

Derek and fremen .. thanx for pointing this out and posting the temp. solution.  You guys rock  ;)

 

1999


  • 0

#42 TheRealZap

TheRealZap

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 14789 posts
  • LocationClemmons, NC USA

Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:23 AM

then i guess 2.0 isn't for you... i have been told that after performing the workaround that hugo suggested that the strat is as intended.

the only thing they are going to fix is the need for the workaround.

that's as fixed as it's going to get... beyond that you can use workbench hd to change to your fit your own personal ideal.

 

Not true... I never used Workbench HD, and I was so unsatisfied with the Spank models that I "downgraded" to 1.9.  While the "quack" from 2 and 4 are important, position 3 is just as important. The new Spank just didn't cut it at all.

 

As I have posted elsewhere, I loved nearly all of the other HD models. Can't wait until the Strat is fixed...


  • 0

#43 snhirsch

snhirsch

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 281 posts
  • LocationBurlington, VT USA

Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:40 AM

Okay. I have looked at my preset. I don't see any mistakes.

When you notice the bridge pickup being down near the bridge on preset 2, it is OFF. Ignore it. The middle pickup is now the bridge pickup. Just use your ears. It is very evident that it works as noticed in Fremen's video. If you notice on my position 4 preset the bridge angle is off, ignore it. The pickup is OFF. ;)

Position 2

Position 4


Let me know if you have any troubles with this, but please, listen to it and tell me it doesn't sound better. :)

 

For whatever reason, my reply never appeared.  When I load your Strat2 file it initially behaved exactly the same as the 2.0 firmware.  I had to cycle the bridge p/u off/on before getting the correct sound - and even after that it reverted back to the incorrect behavior when uploaded to the guitar.  After going through several rounds, lo and behold it started working!  I'm not going to touch it until Line6 releases an update.  Nor sure what was going on nor why it suddenly began to cooperate.

 

I have not tried your Strat4 sound since it's not clear to me that there's any problem with that setting.  It does not sound like the old Strat4, but it's distinctly different from 3 and 5. 


  • 0

40 years of Rock-n-Roll and proud of it!

 

PRS Custom 24 (1990) w/ GK-3 Hex PU

James Tyler Variax JTV-69(k) w/ Strat Neck

Roland GR-55 Guitar Synth

QSC K10 FRFR

 


#44 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5268 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:40 AM

As I have posted elsewhere, I loved nearly all of the other HD models. Can't wait until the Strat is fixed...

 

I don't think it's going to be fixed. It's not broken.


  • 0
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 


#45 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 06:49 AM

I would very much like the line 6 to hurry to fix these serious bugs in strat


  • 0

#46 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 06:53 AM

phil but you do not consider the fact not be possible to save the bridge and pickups together through a defect? in fact, what we did was a form of work out, as we say in Brazil, a little Brazilian way, but it seems clear that there is a software problem seems to be solved

I don't think it's going to be fixed. It's not broken.


  • 0

#47 johnbartus

johnbartus

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:24 AM

then i guess 2.0 isn't for you... i have been told that after performing the workaround that hugo suggested that the strat is as intended.

the only thing they are going to fix is the need for the workaround.

that's as fixed as it's going to get... beyond that you can use workbench hd to change to your fit your own personal ideal.

 

The need for a workaround is a problem that needs to be fixed. The fact that we have to have a workaround to get the Strat model sounding like a Strat is a problem that needs to be fixed. Once the problem is fixed, I will gladly re-upgrade to 2.0 -- but when a good 50% of my live gig sounds are Strats, I need a model that sounds like a Strat. I can always go back to playing a real Strat anytime. I really like, however, the flexibility of having a JTV with all the models so I can leave my Strats, Teles, and acoustics at home.

 

The first step is admitting that there really is a problem...

 

;) 


  • 0
John Bartus
Live From The Florida Keys!
PO Box 2523
Marathon Shores, FL 33052
 
johnbartus_small.jpgjohnbartus2_small.jpg
Variax 600 • Variax 300 • Variax 700 Acoustic • James Tyler Variax JTV-69 & JTV-89 • Pod HD500

#48 TheRealZap

TheRealZap

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 14789 posts
  • LocationClemmons, NC USA

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:44 AM

yeah, by all means if it's just eliminating that position 2/4 bug is the fix you're looking for... its going to be done...

i thought you said you wanted positions 1/3/5 to be somehow different... that's not going to happen.

they've admitted that one and are working on it....

i think everyone here loves the variax.. :)

 

The need for a workaround is a problem that needs to be fixed. The fact that we have to have a workaround to get the Strat model sounding like a Strat is a problem that needs to be fixed. Once the problem is fixed, I will gladly re-upgrade to 2.0 -- but when a good 50% of my live gig sounds are Strats, I need a model that sounds like a Strat. I can always go back to playing a real Strat anytime. I really like, however, the flexibility of having a JTV with all the models so I can leave my Strats, Teles, and acoustics at home.

 

The first step is admitting that there really is a problem...

 

;)


  • 0

#49 johnbartus

johnbartus

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 08:17 AM

As Frankenstein would say,

 

"Variax... GOOD!!!"

 

:) 


  • 0
John Bartus
Live From The Florida Keys!
PO Box 2523
Marathon Shores, FL 33052
 
johnbartus_small.jpgjohnbartus2_small.jpg
Variax 600 • Variax 300 • Variax 700 Acoustic • James Tyler Variax JTV-69 & JTV-89 • Pod HD500

#50 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5268 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 23 August 2013 - 10:58 AM

phil but you do not consider the fact not be possible to save the bridge and pickups together through a defect? in fact, what we did was a form of work out, as we say in Brazil, a little Brazilian way, but it seems clear that there is a software problem seems to be solved

 

There is a bug in Workbench that needs to and will be fixed. But the base Strat sound in the HD update is not going to be changed. Once the bug in Workbench is corrected, though, it will make it easier for people get a sound that is more like the 1.9 sound without going through a workaround procedure.


  • 0
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 


#51 Line6Hugo

Line6Hugo

    Uber Guru

  • Members
  • 6592 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:13 PM

Hello,

 

Just want to reiterate that we are currently fixing a bug in Workbench HD v2.01.0 that can defeat the bridge pickup sound uploading models that use the bridge+middle pickup combination to the JTV. Users who have uploaded (even an unmodified) Spank-2 patch either individually or as part of a bank or bundle, will now have a patch which sounds identical to Spank 3 in that position.

 

Users who have not uploaded Spank-2 to the guitar via workbench will have the correct bridge+middle model based on the 1959 Stratocaster in Spank 2.

 

Users affected by the issue can use the following workaround to repair affected patches or create new Bridge+Middle patches:

 

1. Begin w/ the desired patch loaded in workbench making sure that the bridge and middle pickup slots are turned on.

2. Choose either the middle or bridge pickup and note the position, angle, level and model settings of either pickup.

3. Select the neck pickup slot (which should be OFF at this point) and enter the settings noted in the previous step.

4. The bridge/middle/neck labeling for the pickup slots may have changed dynamically at this point, note which pickup is OFF.

5. Turn OFF the pickup chosen in step 2.

6. Turn ON the pickup noted in step 4.

7. Upload this patch to the guitar.

 

 

Best regards,

 

Line6Hugo


  • 0

#52 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 04:19 PM

hugo, in my case I did download the patch workhound, but even so I would have corrected spank and do it again when the new update is released, we can all have this update right?

Hello,

 

Just want to reiterate that we are currently fixing a bug in Workbench HD v2.01.0 that can defeat the bridge pickup sound uploading models that use the bridge+middle pickup combination to the JTV. Users who have uploaded (even an unmodified) Spank-2 patch either individually or as part of a bank or bundle, will now have a patch which sounds identical to Spank 3 in that position.

 

Users who have not uploaded Spank-2 to the guitar via workbench will have the correct bridge+middle model based on the 1959 Stratocaster in Spank 2.

 

Users affected by the issue can use the following workaround to repair affected patches or create new Bridge+Middle patches:

 

1. Begin w/ the desired patch loaded in workbench making sure that the bridge and middle pickup slots are turned on.

2. Choose either the middle or bridge pickup and note the position, angle, level and model settings of either pickup.

3. Select the neck pickup slot (which should be OFF at this point) and enter the settings noted in the previous step.

4. The bridge/middle/neck labeling for the pickup slots may have changed dynamically at this point, note which pickup is OFF.

5. Turn OFF the pickup chosen in step 2.

6. Turn ON the pickup noted in step 4.

7. Upload this patch to the guitar.

 

 

Best regards,

 

Line6Hugo


  • 0

#53 Inerzia

Inerzia

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 166 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:49 PM

At last! the experts acknowledged there is a problem that needs to be fixed. We're saved!
BTW, the strat DOES have another problem. Strings 1 and 2 are quite lower in volume (and it's not just my case, it's something that many people have reported since 2.0 came out), something that doesn't happen with other bodies.
Yes, I know I can fix it with workbench, and that's exactly what I did, but it's still a defect ...and please, no one tell me it's a matter of taste...


  • 0

#54 AdInfinitum

AdInfinitum

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 33 posts

Posted 24 August 2013 - 07:20 AM

Why can't Line6 include both the 1.9 and 2.0 Strat in the new firmware? There are enough of their customers who are complaining they don't particularly like the sound of the "HD" Strat. So, why is Line6 forcing users to choose between the two. And yes, Line6 is making users choose. Please don't say "if they don't like the new Strat then don't upgrade." There are many additional features besides an upgraded Strat sound in the update. Users should forego all of that because Line6 makes an arbitrary decision to "fix something that was broken".

For example, when the Axe-FX updates an amp model and the users say, "hey, I really loved the old one" Fractal will frequently include the old amp model in the next update.

I really can't understand why companies can't just add the new models, but keep the old ones as well. Let the users choose what models they want. Isn't that the whole point of the Variax in the first place?
  • 0

#55 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5268 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 24 August 2013 - 07:37 AM

I really can't understand why companies can't just add the new models, but keep the old ones as well. Let the users choose what models they want. Isn't that the whole point of the Variax in the first place?

 

I think a big part of comes down to service and maintaining the base code. I suppose they could possible make the different models available through Workbench, but even then it could become troublesome. If you have models that were constructed using one modeling technique and others that were made another way, if issues come up with things, it could be a real pain trying to work back through two different modeling paths.

 

I think what's different with the update compared to other Line 6 updates is that typically Line 6 doesn't radically alter the core sounds of an existing product. Usually the only do that with a hardware change. The Variax was weird because even though the hardware was updated in 2010, the software models weren't updated beyond some tweaking until now. But the original Variax models are almost 10 years old now, and that's a really long time for a platform. I think Line 6 decided now was the time to renew the platform.


  • 0
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 


#56 TheRealZap

TheRealZap

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 14789 posts
  • LocationClemmons, NC USA

Posted 24 August 2013 - 09:08 AM

there's also the probability that they had to update the variax "engine" that renders the models to audio...

perhaps playing the old models on the new engine would not sound the same anyway.... as in it isn't possible without tweaking the old models... which they are done with and have no intention of tweaking further.

just one theory....

but they give you the tool to do your own tweaking in workbench HD...

the new models are here to stay.


  • 0

#57 ReverendLove

ReverendLove

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 124 posts
  • LocationCologne, Germany

Posted 24 August 2013 - 09:16 AM

It's supposable or nearly obvious that they cannot do it. If they use a complete new code, then structures, data types, classes and everything like this changed.
For the old models they would have to implement a converter in the firmware for the price of loosing processing power.


  • 0

#58 davemed

davemed

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 24 August 2013 - 09:51 AM

Is anyone else also unhappy with the new Chime settings in the HD update?


  • 0

#59 johnnyayyy

johnnyayyy

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1364 posts

Posted 24 August 2013 - 10:16 AM

It's supposable or nearly obvious that they cannot do it. If they use a complete new code, then structures, data types, classes and everything like this changed.
For the old models they would have to implement a converter in the firmware for the price of loosing processing power.

 

Obvious solution:

 

1. buy a used Variax 300 for next to nothing (usually around $200)

 

2. install Variax 300 guts in JTV next to JTV guts

 

3. Add an A/B/ switch to choose between old Variax sounds and 2.0 sounds

 

Or just play the Variax 300 when you want the old sounds

 

Or just leave 1.9 installed and enjoy it.

 

Or reinstall the firmware when you want to change between sounds

 

Or tweak the 2.0 sounds in Workbench til they sound exactly like the 1.9 sounds (someone will eventually do this and provide the results as a download, thus becoming a hero to a few here ( I would start by rolling off the tone knob and decreasing the volume in 2.0, that should get you in the ballpark).

 

Or work the EQ on a POD HD til it sounds like the old tones. I know, I know, "But the EQ in the POD HD is labeled in % and I can only use and EQ that is labled in Hz or Db!".

 

Adapt/evolve or die, as they say... or: "you must choose, but choose wisely, for as the real grail brings eternal life, the false grail brings death"

 


  • 0

#60 offashead

offashead

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 30 posts

Posted 24 August 2013 - 10:18 AM

Is anyone else also unhappy with the new Chime settings in the HD update?

I reckon it's major improvement, give it time. These new models ( all of them) do sound a little different but better to me, and like anything that changes it can be drastic to some and not to others. However having not had the guitar long I didn't get to know the previous versions in great detail, never the less I can tell the difference


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users