Jump to content


Photo

Battle Of The Quacks


Best Answer phil_m , 01 September 2013 - 11:23 AM

Well, it's been over 24 hours now, so I guess I'll reveal what's what.

 

Quack1 is the Variax, and Quack2 is the American Standard Strat. More people ended being wrong than right in the poll, so I guess kudos to Line 6 here.

 

There is actually a giveaway in the tracks if you listen close enough. On the real Strat track you can hear the hum from the middle pickup kick in when I slide the 5-way switch past it. In the Variax track it's quiet through the change.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Which is real Strat? (29 member(s) have cast votes)

Of the following samples, which one is the real Strat?

  1. Quack1 (14 votes [48.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 48.28%

  2. Quack2 (15 votes [51.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 51.72%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Crusty_Old_Rocker

Crusty_Old_Rocker

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5112 posts
  • LocationGold Coast - Australia

Posted 08 September 2013 - 03:33 PM

I was expecting this your revelation :rolleyes:
in any case IMHO the 1.9 Strat is better than both Quack1 and your real Quack2

so from me more kudos to the past 1.9 Line6 work, and not only for the Quacks

 

I'm often flummoxed by comments like this.  The aim of the modelling is to sound like the real thing, not some caricature or derivative of the real thing.  Similar comments have been made in the past about the amp modelling, where people have preferred sanitised amp modelling rather than "warts and all" amp modelling where some chariteristics of the modelling (e.g. power capacitor bleed) were acurately included in the modelling, but people wanted those true characteristics removed.

 

If people prefer to have a Strat model that doesn't actually sound like a Strat, where does that leave those who do want the modelling to accurately reproduce the true sound of the real thing?

 

I recognise that it's all about preferences and individual tastes, but if the aim is to reproduce the sound of a real Strat and people struggle to differentiate the two, then I belive the modelling has achieved its goal.

 

BTW, I have an American Deluxe Strat and the Variax does a great job of sounding plenty Stratty to me.

 

Cheers,

 

Crusty


  • 1

#22 hurghanico

hurghanico

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1259 posts
  • LocationBologna, Italy

Posted 08 September 2013 - 04:11 PM

..The aim of the modelling is to sound like the real thing, not some caricature or derivative of the real thing.  Similar comments have been made in the past about the amp modelling, where people have preferred sanitised amp modelling rather than "warts and all" amp modelling where some chariteristics of the modelling (e.g. power capacitor bleed) were acurately included in the modelling, but people wanted those true characteristics removed...

 

I have the same opinion about the aim of the modelling..

I have a HD500 and before I had a XTL full loaded with every model done by Line6, I switched to the HD because I think is more like the real thing, and first of all for me it sounds better, I don't know if in the equation we should include which exact real amp they modeled but sonically for most of the amps the result is better than before..

 

and really, personally I've never been interested in sanitised modeling, but anyway I need to be captured by the timbre and character of any instrument.. in other words: I have a little to fall in love of the sounds

 

 

If people prefer to have a Strat model that doesn't actually sound like a Strat, where does that leave those who do want the modelling to accurately reproduce the true sound of the real thing?

 

who told you that the previous Strat model doesn't sound exactly like a Strat, maybe doesn't sound exactly like yours, but personally I think that sounds like a very nice Strat..

I'm between those people who want accurate modeling, but also the best possible real guitars modeled..

you can very accurately model any guitar, very good or less impressive, but ideally which models you would put in your variax?


  • 1

#23 Crusty_Old_Rocker

Crusty_Old_Rocker

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5112 posts
  • LocationGold Coast - Australia

Posted 08 September 2013 - 04:33 PM

who told you that the previous Strat model doesn't sound exactly like a Strat, maybe doesn't sound exactly like yours, but personally I think that sounds like a very nice Strat..

What JTV and Strats are you currently using in your comparisons?

 

Having owned and played many Strats over the past 37 years, I do have a bit of an idea of what a strat sounds like. My current Strat is a 2008 American Deluxe V Neck.

I also have owned a Variax 600 and still currently have a Variax 700 and a JTV69. The Strat model on my Variax 700 comes from Ron Huisen's "Patch Creativity Bundle". I replaced the Strat model on my Variax 600 and Variax 700 with that Strat model becuause Ron's version sounded more like my real Strats than the official Variax versions (which are what was in v1.9 on the JTV).

I won't have to use Ron Huisen's Strat patch on my JTV69 with the HD modelling because it now sounds more like the Strat I currently own and the many other Strats that I've owned and played over the years.

But, that's just me. I'm more than happy to let others prefer the stock v1.9 Strat, to each their own. However, I found the v1.9 Strat wasn't as accurate as Ron Huisen's patch, but I find that I don't need to alter the v2.0 Strat to get an accurate Strat sound out of it.

I just wanted to clarify that I actually have, sitting right next to me, a Variax 700 with the equivalent of the v1.9 Strat (in the FACTORY bank) plus Ron Huisen's Strat patch (in the USER bank), a JTV69 with v2.0 firmware and a real live Fender Stratocaster for direct comparisons that I have made using a variety of real and modelled amps. Based on those comparisons, I find the JTV69 v2.0 firmware the most consistent with my real live Fender Stratocaster.

Cheers,
Crusty


  • 0

#24 dkemusic

dkemusic

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 65 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:01 PM

I wouldn't go so far as too say the v1.9 doesn't sound like a Strat.  Whether you've been playing for 37 years, or 1 doesn't make it any less accurate a model than the 2.0 version (and I've been playing for 48+ years).  As to which is better I think they're both good, just different from each other.

 

Dan


  • 0

#25 hurghanico

hurghanico

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1259 posts
  • LocationBologna, Italy

Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:14 PM

What JTV and Strats are you currently using in your comparisons?

 

I too played several Fender Strats, at the moment with me as a Strat type guitar I have only a Blade customized with Kinman blues PUPS which sound really good but it's somewhat different than a typical Strat..

anyway I think I have a good idea how it should generally sound a Strat but almost every strat I played has its own character..

 

IMO the one modeled in fw 1.9 sounds very nice and has its own character

 

so in the end it is probably more a matter of personal taste than accurate modeling


  • 1

#26 Crusty_Old_Rocker

Crusty_Old_Rocker

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5112 posts
  • LocationGold Coast - Australia

Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:25 PM

I wouldn't go so far as too say the v1.9 doesn't sound like a Strat.

 

Dan

 

You're right, it's just that Ron Huisen's patch sounded more consistent with my genuine Fender Strat.  They do all sound Stratty.

 

I'm just providing the outcome of my direct comparisons between Variax 700 (v1.9 equivalent), JTV69 with v1.9 and v2.0 firmware and a genuine Fender Stratocaster all of which I have with me right here and now, that's all.

 

Cheers,

 

Crusty


  • 0

#27 Crusty_Old_Rocker

Crusty_Old_Rocker

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5112 posts
  • LocationGold Coast - Australia

Posted 08 September 2013 - 05:30 PM

so in the end it is probably more a matter of personal taste than accurate modeling

 

Then fire up Workbench and adjust your JTV to make a guitar that suits you personal taste.  What JTV do you have?

 

You're not constrained to the defaults.  Ron Huisen got the Variax to sound more like a Strat than the default, so you can certainly make the JTV sound less like a genuine Fender Strat to suit your personal taste.  It's all good.

 

Cheers,

 

Crusty


  • 0

#28 Charlie_Watt

Charlie_Watt

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 814 posts

Posted 08 September 2013 - 07:07 PM

That's the wonder of workbench!  You can significantly affect the tone of the models and balance the string volumes to your own taste.  If you don't like the 2.0 Strat then change it!  My guess is that the default models sound very much like the guitars that Line 6 used to generate them. 


  • 0

#29 hurghanico

hurghanico

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1259 posts
  • LocationBologna, Italy

Posted 09 September 2013 - 02:38 AM

Then fire up Workbench and adjust your JTV to make a guitar that suits you personal taste...

 

I prefer to stay with my japanese 700 (fw 1.70 equivalent = 1.9 just for the electrics) for now..

 

the 700 included Strat sounds already good for me and doesn't need any fixing/customizations..
I use/used the workbench to correct all the 12 strings models (doubled strings volume/tuning balance), and to make new combinations/customizations with the given parts..


  • 1

#30 Crusty_Old_Rocker

Crusty_Old_Rocker

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5112 posts
  • LocationGold Coast - Australia

Posted 09 September 2013 - 09:08 AM

I prefer to stay with my japanese 700 (fw 1.70 equivalent = 1.9 just for the electrics) for now..

the 700 included Strat sounds already good for me and doesn't need any fixing/customizations..
I use/used the workbench to correct all the 12 strings models (doubled strings volume/tuning balance), and to make new combinations/customizations with the given parts..


I'm a little confused. Why are you playing the 700 when you could roll back your JTV to 1.9?

Why can't you roll your JTV back to 1.9?

Cheers,

Crusty
  • 0

#31 hurghanico

hurghanico

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1259 posts
  • LocationBologna, Italy

Posted 09 September 2013 - 01:25 PM

I'm a little confused. Why are you playing the 700 when you could roll back your JTV to 1.9?

Why can't you roll your JTV back to 1.9?

 

because the 700 is the only Variax I have.. ;)


  • 1

#32 johnnyayyy

johnnyayyy

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1364 posts

Posted 10 September 2013 - 09:01 AM

Two things:

 

1. Interesting that people are still voting on this after the correct answer has been revealed...

 

2. The real Strat sounds like it could benefit from a minor pickup adjustment - I bet the middle pickup is adjusted low to keep it out of the way of picking, if so raising it a tick might have made it more difficult to hear a big difference between the two recordings.

 

Yes, I am in effect saying the real Strat sound could be improved to make it sound as good as the JTV, deal with it... :lol:


  • 1

#33 pinoguitar

pinoguitar

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 27 December 2013 - 09:17 PM

I guess it's thing of taste and adjustment. And Strat is not Strat.

But I dial another body in Workbench and everything is fine for me again.

First is the orig. v2.0, second is my body changed.

Attached Files


  • 0

Pino -

 

JTV59, JTV89





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users