Jump to content


Photo

Acoustic Sounds Get Worser From Update To Update?


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

#21 hurghanico

hurghanico

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1259 posts
  • LocationBologna, Italy

Posted 11 September 2013 - 04:10 AM

The 89F comes with a Graph Tech bridge..

 

does the 89F sound different than the other JTV models?


  • 0

#22 Charlie_Watt

Charlie_Watt

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 814 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 05:32 AM

Graphtec was easy conversion on the old Variax 500, 600, etc but not so at least on my JTV 69s.  The bridge is way different. 


  • 0

#23 silverhead

silverhead

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 11097 posts
  • LocationOttawa, Ontario, Canada

Posted 11 September 2013 - 05:40 AM

Wich make me wonder how will sound the jtv with graph tec...... ;)

 

I've wondered that too, but haven't felt the need to swap the JTV piezos. I own a Variax 300 and changed to Graphtec pickups a couple of years ago. The sound improvement was incredible - much better than the original V300 piezos.

 

When I purchased a JTV one of the first things I did was compare sounds with the upgraded V300. At that time the JTV modeling was the same as the V300, so any difference in sound  would have been due to the different piezos. I could not tell any difference; to my ears the new JTV piezos sound as good as the Graphtec.

 

Mind you, technology moves ahead - perhaps the latest version of the Graphtec would indeed be better, but I know for me it's not worth it. I am very happy with my JTV as it is, and I'm pretty sure the quality of the piezos is not the limiting factor in my sound or playing. :lol:


  • 1

Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
.... John Lennon

 

 


#24 Charlie_Watt

Charlie_Watt

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 814 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 05:53 AM

In my 500, the difference was big because of two things:  Graphtech ghost piezos are grounded and the Variax ones were not. The Ghost are potted into the bridge pieces - the Variax ones are just spring loaded and can move around or lose contact with the string.  I am not sure how the JTV piezos are grounded.  They can still move around in the bridge which I don't really like but they do sound as good as my 500 Ghost pickups.


  • 0

#25 Leftzilla

Leftzilla

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 289 posts
  • LocationBurlington, VT

Posted 11 September 2013 - 06:35 AM

The JTV89F has the graphtec piezos.  But to truly compare you would need the 89 hard tail and 89F with the Flotd Rose.  I have a 59 and the difference between guitars seems to influence the sound more than the different piezo's (At least to me).  I have two bands and they both thought that the acoustic emulation out of the 89F "sounded" better.  However when I recorded them side to side no one could tell the difference


  • 0

#26 LarryLion

LarryLion

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 142 posts
  • LocationCaledon, Ontario

Posted 11 September 2013 - 06:39 AM

The JTV acoustic models are not great, BUT ... if you don't play hard, and let the amp do the work, I find they can work a lot better, i.e., they respond better to a lighter touch.  Try that - the tendency on an actual (unamplified) acoustic is to play harder, and I find it is the reverse with a set of acoustic simulations, like on the JTV. Also, the acoustic models do not respond well to low neck position bending, or string bending in general, which is physically possible on the JTV, but not on most "real" acoustics.  The solution - resist the extreme bending, and play the acoustic model as if it was the real deal with respect to bending, it will sound more natural.  You wouldn't "bend" the average 12-string, why bend the JTV model?  Same applies to the resonator models.

 

The only significant limitation of the JTV's acoustic model, IMO, is the lack of a wound 3rd string, and the string gauge "feel", due to physically smaller (electric) gauges.  The simulation connot cover that "feel", so playing acoustic on the JTV doesn't feel right.

 

I've rigged my JTV through a Boss LS-2 (line selector pedal) with a simple loop-back, to give me volume boost when connected to a PA, and I can strum or pick softly, and still be loud enough, when I want to be.  Takes a little time to play "simulated acoustic" effectively, but it is definitely do-able.


  • 1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Larry d'Lion

 

2012 Line 6 JTV-69

Plus lots of Tele's, Gretsches,

Mesa Boogie amps, Fender Blues Jr.,

... and lots of acoustic stuff


#27 clay-man

clay-man

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 654 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 06:54 AM

The JTV acoustic models are not great, BUT ... if you don't play hard, and let the amp do the work, I find they can work a lot better, i.e., they respond better to a lighter touch.  Try that - the tendency on an actual (unamplified) acoustic is to play harder, and I find it is the reverse with a set of acoustic simulations, like on the JTV. Also, the acoustic models do not respond well to low neck position bending, or string bending in general, which is physically possible on the JTV, but not on most "real" acoustics.  The solution - resist the extreme bending, and play the acoustic model as if it was the real deal with respect to bending, it will sound more natural.  You wouldn't "bend" the average 12-string, why bend the JTV model?  Same applies to the resonator models.

 

The only significant limitation of the JTV's acoustic model, IMO, is the lack of a wound 3rd string, and the string gauge "feel", due to physically smaller (electric) gauges.  The simulation connot cover that "feel", so playing acoustic on the JTV doesn't feel right.

 

I've rigged my JTV through a Boss LS-2 (line selector pedal) with a simple loop-back, to give me volume boost when connected to a PA, and I can strum or pick softly, and still be loud enough, when I want to be.  Takes a little time to play "simulated acoustic" effectively, but it is definitely do-able.

 

This. I found playing hard makes it sound very unnatural. Might be that "piezo quack" thing going on that's causing that.


  • 0

For a minute there, I lost myself.

Radiohead_bear-728286%5B1%5D.png 


#28 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:00 AM

what is the piezzo that comes in 69?


  • 0

#29 clay-man

clay-man

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 654 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:05 AM

what is the piezzo that comes in 69?

 

"L. R. Baggs Radiance Hex piezo pickup system"

 

Not available to buy directly, I don't think.

 

This is the piezo quality from best to worst I think:

 

Graphtech Ghost system

LR Baggs Radience system

300/400/500/600 LR Baggs X-bridge-esque piezos


  • 0

For a minute there, I lost myself.

Radiohead_bear-728286%5B1%5D.png 


#30 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:23 AM

the grahtech is possible to buy separately? it will be worth the trade for this in my 69?

"L. R. Baggs Radiance Hex piezo pickup system"

 

Not available to buy directly, I don't think.

 

This is the piezo quality from best to worst I think:

 

Graphtech Ghost system

LR Baggs Radience system

300/400/500/600 LR Baggs X-bridge-esque piezos


  • 0

#31 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5277 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:31 AM

the grahtech is possible to buy separately? it will be worth the trade for this in my 69?

 

I don't think it's even feasible to replace the saddles on the 69 (or any of the JTV other models, for that matter) with the Graph Tech saddles. The saddles are integral to the bridge in the JTV. I would think that the gap between the current saddles and the Ghost saddles would be relatively small.


  • 0
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 


#32 clay-man

clay-man

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 654 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:33 AM

the grahtech is possible to buy separately? it will be worth the trade for this in my 69?

 

The graphtech stuff is possible to get, but I'm not sure it would fit on the 69 because of the 69's saddle design. In fact, I think it would  require a lot of changed to the guitar to be able to use the piezos:

 

Possibly a whole new bridge, including tremolo block, because the bridge also has the weird screw design with the saddles.


  • 0

For a minute there, I lost myself.

Radiohead_bear-728286%5B1%5D.png 


#33 Charlie_Watt

Charlie_Watt

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 814 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 08:32 AM

I see no way to change the piezo's on the 69 due to the very unique bridge and saddle design.  The old Variax was very Strat like and the Ghost Strat saddles would go right on the Variax bridge. 

 

Playing style with the Acoustic models is an issue.  You can't play it hard like a real acoustic (IMO) and have it sound good.  This may be mostly due to the setup.


  • 0

#34 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 08:56 AM

only once I had a chance to test my jtv ( 1.9 at that time ) and a 300 side by side, to be honest I liked most of the acoustic 300 , softer , with less aggressive presence . but in return , the patch used for the 300 sounded good , had a lot more efects, eqs ,compressor , since the jtv I needed much less eqs
  • 0

#35 robdog03

robdog03

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 11 September 2013 - 11:34 PM

To me, the "HD" acoustic models are a mixed bag.

 

Pro: They sound more like a mic'd guitar, vs a piezo pickup, which I think is better for recording.

 

Con: I don't think they sound much like the guitars that are modeled...esp Acoustic 3. Also, I'm not crazy about the mic ambience in a live context.

 

My $0.02.

 

-Rob


  • 0

#36 pugdealer

pugdealer

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 172 posts
  • LocationPortugal

Posted 12 September 2013 - 04:38 AM

I just updated to 2.0!

 

I agree with someone who said that in the old variax up until the JTV with 1.71 the acoustics sounded like reeally good acoustic to DI sounds, and that was just fine by me...sounded good right out of the guitar with no tweaking and were easily manipulated to get the right tone. I LOOOOVED the dreadnought!!

 

After 1.8 they got that mic'ed sound, and I hated them...there was just toooo much room effect for me, and I started hating the dread. The acoustics sounded muddy, distant, flat, really booomy, and I couldn't use/like them no matter how much tweaking I did, so I stuck with 1.71.

 

Now the 2.0

The acoustics struck me again as a bit too roomy and muddy/boomy. I wish they modeled them with a mix of DI feel. Still hate the dread, but I find the gibson nice and usable. Acoustics are really important to me, so I really need to like them to keep the 2.0

On the electric side, the first thing I noticed was how much better palm muting sounds...I know this had been improved in previous firmwares, but I'd been stuck with 1.71 so that's a big change for me. I haven't explored much at all, so I'll have to report back on that some other time


  • 0

#37 ur2funky

ur2funky

    Iknowathingortwo

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts

Posted 12 September 2013 - 05:55 AM

After a week with 2.0, I flashed back to 1.9 and found the acoustics (especially #3) very compressed.  I went back to 2.0 and prefer the dynamics of the acoustics, but hate the life-less Strat.  I changed the body of the Strat to the Dano in Workbench (as from a tip on this site), and it does help make them usable. 

 

The dynamic nature of the acoustics in 2.0 suit my playing style better than the 1.9


  • 0

#38 derek_32999

derek_32999

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 18 posts

Posted 12 September 2013 - 06:17 AM

Out of curiosity, after hearing so many say that the acoustics on 2.0 sounds worse or better than 1.9, isn't it a fact that the acoustic modelling is the same?  The acoustic update was in FW 1.8 wasn't it?  So, to hear a difference you would have to flash back to 1.7.

 

:ph34r:


  • 0

#39 TheRealZap

TheRealZap

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 14814 posts
  • LocationClemmons, NC USA

Posted 12 September 2013 - 06:28 AM

you're correct, but the full optimization within the JTV for the HD models seems to have enhanced them in 2.0, even though they are the same models.

 

Out of curiosity, after hearing so many say that the acoustics on 2.0 sounds worse or better than 1.9, isn't it a fact that the acoustic modelling is the same?  The acoustic update was in FW 1.8 wasn't it?  So, to hear a difference you would have to flash back to 1.7.

 

:ph34r:


  • 0

#40 Junis

Junis

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 80 posts

Posted 12 September 2013 - 07:01 AM

someone tried to make martin 12 in 6? through the WB? if so, what did you think?


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users