Jump to content


Photo

Podfarm Plug-in "next" Poll


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

Poll: PODFarm "Next" (66 member(s) have cast votes)

What format upgrade would you like to see for PODFarm?

  1. POD Farm HD with AAX would be awesome (31 votes [40.79%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 40.79%

  2. POD Farm HD VST is fine for me. I don't need AAX (22 votes [28.95%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 28.95%

  3. I'm fine with PT & PT2. Please add AAX support to existing POD Farm plug-in (23 votes [30.26%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.26%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 05 October 2013 - 12:49 PM

Hey folks . . .

 

The latest version of Pro Tools has dropped support for RTAS, in favor of their AAX plug-in format, thus leaving POD Farm users out in the cold.

 

I've created a short poll to see if there is anyone else out there who would like to have an options available for POD Farm HD and/or AAX support.  'Just curious . . .


  • 0

#2 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:06 AM

Interesting that there has been such little response to this.  Looks like 3 users cast votes including me.  Is that indicative of how few users Pro Tools take the PODFarm plug-in's seriously?  I'd be interested in other's takes on this subject . . .


  • 0

#3 TheRealZap

TheRealZap

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 14893 posts
  • LocationClemmons, NC USA

Posted 07 October 2013 - 05:18 AM

I don't use pro tools... but i do think that the pod should support all the big players... and pro tools is a big player (understatement...)

i think your last option meant PF1 and PF2 not PT... makes it kind of confusing....

 

and 3 out of the 4 options are add AAX (non pro tool users dont know what it is and dont care...)

just not thinking there will not be a verdict with any weight to it with the poll being a little obviously slanted towards adding AAX...

and it would be beyond silly of them to do a PF-HD upgrade without AAX/VST3 at this point


  • 0

#4 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 07 October 2013 - 07:22 AM

Thanks Zap . . . Noted and corrected.


  • 0

#5 fflbrgst

fflbrgst

    Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1625 posts
  • LocationNew England

Posted 07 October 2013 - 12:52 PM

I use Reaper!  :)


  • 0

#6 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 07 October 2013 - 01:00 PM

I use Reaper!  :)

Thanks Mike . . . So does that mean you would like to see an HD version of POD Farm?


  • 0

#7 Dellers

Dellers

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 08 October 2013 - 05:42 AM

I'd totally like to see a new version with AAX, but even AAX support for the existing one would help. Right now POD Farm is destroying my workflow since I have to export wave files from PT10 and insert them into PT11. Not very convenient in a mixing situation where I need to change things to fit in the mix.


  • 1

#8 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 08 October 2013 - 05:52 AM

Thanks for the comment Dellers.  So if Line 6 doesn't upgrade their solution, what would you see as an alternative?  Personally, I don't believe swapping between PT10 and PT11 is a long term solution.


  • 0

#9 britune

britune

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:59 PM

go to http://line6.ideasca...11/503352-23508 to vote to get Pod Farm in AAX


  • 0

#10 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 18 October 2013 - 04:50 PM

go to http://line6.ideasca...11/503352-23508 to vote to get Pod Farm in AAX

Yep!!


  • 0

#11 sigungrick

sigungrick

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 06:03 PM

I would like to see an update to the existing Pod Farm to support AAX. At the very least, see a new version offered with AAX support. Going back and forth between PT10 and PT11 is quickly becoming not an option for me. If I don't see something within the next week or two from Line 6 stating there's an update coming, I'll moving on to a different product that already supports AAX.


  • 1

#12 thiedent

thiedent

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 05:21 AM

I use pro tools and having always chosen line 6 gear for my recording needs it's been sad for me waiting for a POD HD vst plugin to take advantage of the greater power of the HD series.


  • 1

#13 BigChas52

BigChas52

    Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 2704 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 04 November 2013 - 05:31 AM

I would like to see an update to the existing Pod Farm to support AAX. At the very least, see a new version offered with AAX support. Going back and forth between PT10 and PT11 is quickly becoming not an option for me. If I don't see something within the next week or two from Line 6 stating there's an update coming, I'll moving on to a different product that already supports AAX.

 

 

I use pro tools and having always chosen line 6 gear for my recording needs it's been sad for me waiting for a POD HD vst plugin to take advantage of the greater power of the HD series.

 

Absolutely agreed on both posts.  The HD modeling would quite possibly be the absolutely best quality amp/effects plug-in on the market.  Line 6 is missing a great opportunity in the recording market by not making HD tech available as a plug-in for the major DAWS (including Pro Tools AAX)


  • 2

#14 Toneshed

Toneshed

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 09 November 2013 - 04:55 PM

AAX64 yes please!!!


  • 1

#15 eheiberg

eheiberg

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 13 November 2013 - 08:31 AM

Yes AAX64 is a must to keep the product valid and alive.  I also use the individual plugs a lot, the mod fx, the preamps…. but the 1st step is to make PF2 AAX64 ready, then do HD. My workaround is using Waves pedalboard stuff and Eleven amps, or Guitar Rig5 (which now works with PT11). Don't make me say goodbye to PF….


  • 1

#16 jhale667

jhale667

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 17 November 2013 - 09:58 PM

As a Pro Tools 10 user looking to upgrade to 11, I'm seriously hoping for AAX support.


  • 0

#17 Rockee

Rockee

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 24 November 2013 - 01:15 PM

I need a AAX 64 Update too. Podfarm is a great Plugin; Hope Line6 porting all of their Plugs to AAX 64.
Switching between Protools 10 and 11 is a real time eater.

Pleas Line6.
Greez


  • 0

#18 teeck2000

teeck2000

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 13 December 2013 - 03:33 PM

This is literally the only thing holding me be back going to PT11 full time. Come on Line 6. On a side note, the new blue cat audio vst hosting aax plugin patchwork is aax64 but pod farm 2.5 doesn't work in PT11, gahhhhh!!!


  • 0

#19 RobertMHussey

RobertMHussey

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 03 January 2014 - 12:25 PM

I am a loyal Line 6 customer and a ProTools user. AAX support is super critical for me. Please, please, please support it with POD Farm 2.5. Thank you!
  • 0

#20 abtabt

abtabt

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 09 January 2014 - 03:20 PM

It would be nice if they would at least give us an answer. I'm working almost exclusively in PT 11 now. I'd like to use Pod Farm but at this point I'm about three days away from buying Amplitube.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users