Jump to content


Photo

Interesting Article About Violin Tone...old Vs. New


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 cruisinon2

cruisinon2

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 758 posts

Posted 21 March 2014 - 08:32 AM

http://m.pnas.org/co...999109.abstract

quoted from the link above:


"Abstract

Most violinists believe that instruments by Stradivari and Guarneri “del Gesu” are tonally superior to other violins—and to new violins in particular. Many mechanical and acoustical factors have been proposed to account for this superiority; however, the fundamental premise of tonal superiority has not yet been properly investigated. Player's judgments about a Stradivari's sound may be biased by the violin's extraordinary monetary value and historical importance, but no studies designed to preclude such biasing factors have yet been published. We asked 21 experienced violinists to compare violins by Stradivari and Guarneri del Gesu with high-quality new instruments. The resulting preferences were based on the violinists’ individual experiences of playing the instruments under double-blind conditions in a room with relatively dry acoustics. We found that (i) the most-preferred violin was new; (ii) the least-preferred was by Stradivari; (iii) there was scant correlation between an instrument's age and monetary value and its perceived quality; and (iv) most players seemed unable to tell whether their most-preferred instrument was new or old. These results present a striking challenge to conventional wisdom. Differences in taste among individual players, along with differences in playing qualities among individual instruments, appear more important than any general differences between new and old violins. Rather than searching for the “secret” of Stradivari, future research might best focused on how violinists evaluate instruments, on which specific playing qualities are most important to them, and on how these qualities relate to measurable attributes of the instruments, whether old or new."



So I wonder how all the firmly entrenched "traditionalist" guitar players would fare in the same experiment?


  • 0

#2 radatats

radatats

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 883 posts
  • LocationOrange County, NY

Posted 21 March 2014 - 08:39 AM

So I wonder how all the firmly entrenched "traditionalist" guitar players would fare in the same experiment?

 

Bingo!  can you say "tube snob"?  :D


  • 1

l6+sig+pic-1.png   


#3 WaubinHood

WaubinHood

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 45 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 21 March 2014 - 03:20 PM

But there will always be ranking via money in every area of human life. Hype lifts an average player over the crowd. Sadly most expensive things are rarely worth the money.

 

But that's humans for you. And the humans invented marketing. Humans are not wise. They rather believe in fairy tales than in truth. There must be some kinda magic in everything. Most people don't even know, if they have excellent instrument or an expensive pile of scrapwood. But the price tag makes you fly up in ladders of our social networks.

 

I wonder when do people realize, that we - using "we" as in "we, the humankind" - really get better in making things and we have really came far from year 1500. As i see it now, that will take some time...


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users