Jump to content


Photo

Are footswitches better in HD500X?

footswitch endurance resistance hd500x microswitch

Best Answer phil_m , 19 June 2014 - 11:25 AM

Well, it's a different plunger mechanism from what I understand, and it is being marketed as being more robust. As to what that means, I can't say exactly. I can't say I've seen anyone complaining about the switches on a HD500X failing, but I do see people having issues with the HD500 switches every now and then. But, of course, the HD500 is an older product with a broader user base at this point, too.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 lachinelli

lachinelli

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 43 posts

Posted 19 June 2014 - 10:50 AM

My HD500 works fine and all and I know the 2 differences between HD500 and HD500X. I hardly use dual-amps but I was interested in knowing if footpedals on HD500X endure better. It's my belief that the changes are only aesthetic; just more light, different footswitch but the microswitch in the board is probably the same one.

Does anyone know if footswitches are actually better?


  • 0

#2 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5549 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 19 June 2014 - 11:25 AM   Best Answer

Well, it's a different plunger mechanism from what I understand, and it is being marketed as being more robust. As to what that means, I can't say exactly. I can't say I've seen anyone complaining about the switches on a HD500X failing, but I do see people having issues with the HD500 switches every now and then. But, of course, the HD500 is an older product with a broader user base at this point, too.


  • 1
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 


#3 bmcoonan

bmcoonan

    Just Startin'

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 23 posts

Posted 27 July 2014 - 09:46 AM

My bottom row of switches don't appear to 'click' anymore - like I can't feel when they are actually changing like I could when I got it a year ago - the 4 up top still do, but then I don't use them nearly as much so in my experience, I don't find them to be that robust really.


  • 0

<p>Brian HD500X, Marshall JVM 410


#4 stumblinman

stumblinman

    Gear Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 573 posts
  • LocationPacific Northwest

Posted 27 July 2014 - 05:50 PM

There's actually several posts on this board about switch issues on the 500x. How many are attributed to board issues and how many are strictly switch issues has not been quantified.

Well, it's a different plunger mechanism from what I understand, and it is being marketed as being more robust. As to what that means, I can't say exactly. I can't say I've seen anyone complaining about the switches on a HD500X failing, but I do see people having issues with the HD500 switches every now and then. But, of course, the HD500 is an older product with a broader user base at this point, too.


  • 0

#5 phil_m

phil_m

    Uber Guru

  • Line 6 Expert
  • 5549 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 27 July 2014 - 06:36 PM

There's actually several posts on this board about switch issues on the 500x. How many are attributed to board issues and how many are strictly switch issues has not been quantified.
 

 

Well, the post you quoted is from over a month ago, and back then I hadn't seen any posts about people having issues with the HD500X's footswitches. And, actually, other than the comment in this post, I still haven't really. I'm not saying there aren't any. I don't see every post on this forum, but I do see most of them. I'm not making any claim other than sharing my anecdotal evidence.


  • 0
Time is a train
Makes the future the past
Leaves you standing in the station
Your face pressed up against the glass

 






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: footswitch, endurance, resistance, hd500x, microswitch

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users