Junis

workbench 2.0, bug of strats

why line6 is taking so long to fix the bugs workbench?

is is very hard to say

I changed the tuning in a reso model to open E ,in worbench, in tuning, and saved, but the tunning only remains when I set the alt tunnings on jtv in the mode, when I put in the standard, tuning back to standard tuning, is therefore that work?

you really think that eqs should stay in 1 in the chain of effects? the compressor would go where?

I recorded a quick sample here via usb audacity in comparing the two patches .1 what you recommended and 2 patch I've ever had here, listen to see what you think ok? but we know that in PA it would sound completely different, but just to have a little notion

test.mp3

Thanks mate, I'll test these their suggestions, and this coming weekend I'll have a gig and will test the patch in PA results, as you asked, the numbers of eq are -2.5, -1.5, -8.5 (the JTV acoustic guitar has very aggressive mediums), -7.7 and +2.0.Yes, you right, I look urgently a good patch to play with a live band (drums, bass and keybords, pop rock band. It's been two years that I did not do anything to not be tweak tweak tweak and tweak, I'm already going crazy LOL

re flash JTV or workbench? the strange thing is that it started giving this problem a few days ago. was normal before

I did not named the preset, when I go to save the preset, the workbench creates this name and mutes the sound

just a wild guess... but it probably doesn't like the symbols in your tone name... try removing the @

someone is having this problem on workbench? sound model that try to change is muted and I get this message
Some expert?

thanks

I'm having difficulty getting a patch that has enough volume but not distort, I use the first chain, tube comp (tresh 89 and 26 level), graphic eq, reverb, the mixer I Set in center and 10 db, before I left the eq after the mixer and more distorted, after I put the eq before the mixer has improved, but still distorts a bit, I already tried using the eq studio flat just to give volume, instead of the tube comp but not much has changed

someone can give a suggestion?

I attached a print of my patch

I also recorded an sample here with positions 2 and 4 of strat, I appreciate if you can hear and give their views

I use POD hd marshall plexy bright

audacity via usb

my strat is with masonite body plank

teste1.mp3

I tried to simulate a similar equalization in pod hd but it was not good

Yes here's some screen caps from the Tonematch, Multiband Compressor, Parametric EQ and Graphic EQ blocks :

 

But as I said the complex EQ of the tonematch block brings the final touch, and for that you'll need something like Ozone on your computer

What is possible to do in Wb to change the tone of the acoustic beyond the pitch and tuning?

someone tried to make martin 12 in 6? through the WB? if so, what did you think?

only once I had a chance to test my jtv ( 1.9 at that time ) and a 300 side by side, to be honest I liked most of the acoustic 300 , softer , with less aggressive presence . but in return , the patch used for the 300 sounded good , had a lot more efects, eqs ,compressor , since the jtv I needed much less eqs

the grahtech is possible to buy separately? it will be worth the trade for this in my 69?

"L. R. Baggs Radiance Hex piezo pickup system"

 

Not available to buy directly, I don't think.

 

This is the piezo quality from best to worst I think:

 

Graphtech Ghost system

LR Baggs Radience system

300/400/500/600 LR Baggs X-bridge-esque piezos

what is the piezzo that comes in 69?

someone can get a good tone with acustic 1 (martin)or 3? already tried everything and nothing makes this model sound good
Solution I had was to make the 2 12 acustics  turn 6, sounded better

what you mean proximity of the acoustic? far as I know do not have this type of regulation in the workbench

something I've been thinking too, I think the delay for this update was so, we have created a huge expectation, that would be the greatest wonder of the world, and despite the advances, some models walked back and disappointed

I already am becoming boring saying the same thing, but I insist, try to put the marsonite planks body in place spank body, I found that much improvement.
My final opinion, after several gigs is that strat, 335 and jazztones worsened much but the rest of the models are much better, despite the very low volume in comparison to 1.9

would have been nice if the line 6, before the release hd, had done research with consumers to know which models should change or not? I know that maybe this is impossible but it would have been cool

cool, I had already seen this video, and this video, except for the 335. jazztone 4 and strat, I consider the 2.0 far superior in every way ,but the strat with marsenite plank body is better than 1.9, test! and semi with ZAP upgrade is very good

I made confusion,I had already seen this video, but I'm talking about another of this same guy he compares the 1.9 to 2.0

I'd love to see a video comparing the 700(or 500,300) with the Variax JTV