ejones1989 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 I am ready to upgrade to HD ... considering the PRO or the 500x. However - I have a ux8 that I use as my primary interface, and i love the recording flexibility of PF 2.5. I assume I could run the Pod HD directly into the UX8 and continue to use the UX8 as my interface (but essentially run a dry signal through PF) Do you think this will create any software conflicts (i would still want to use the USB off of the HD500X to get access to the editor)? Will this create any latency problems? thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealZap Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 should work, I use a tascam us1800 and the pod hd desktop. I feed the hd tone into my tascam analog and spdif. i have the spdif set to dry, and enable 2 tracks. this way i can stick with the hd modeling if it suits me or use PF2 later if i prefer. the only potential conflict i would see would be midi if you are trying to realtime control PF2.. even that could be worked out though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejones1989 Posted July 29, 2013 Author Share Posted July 29, 2013 Thanks Zap -- much appreciated. I'll give it a shot. Best, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.