Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

Atomic Amplifire 12?


Meiannatee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Since I gave away my HD500x (yes it came as a surprise even for me), I've been looking at getting a Helix. Then the Amplifire 12 came up. Before that, I've never had heard of Atomic Amps, but after a dozen videos, I'm intrigued. The form factor neatly fits into a regular backpack, and it's almost half the price of the Helix.

 

The routing is simpler, the on-board editing seems complicated, there's no audio interface. But anyways, I won't be doing any crazy routing, prefer editing on the computer, and already have an audio interface. So while I REALLY want the Helix ('till it hurts a little), I'm having a hard time justifying the price after comparison.

 

Another problem is that there is hardly any info on the official website, and I'm not too familiar with the company.

 

What do you guys think about the Helix vs. Amplifire 12, as an all-in-one direct to FoH solution, primarily for a church setting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no one seems to have any actual experience of it! But as an Amplifire with a better pedal board (seems it is the same technology exactly - patches are totally compatible), it would be the perfect tool for someone who wants a modeling system that is a bit more simple than the Helix.  It's not as full featured, but it is a lot cheaper.

Expect to need an Expression pedal - so the gap will shrink a bit.

Only you can say if it does what you need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I gave away my HD500x (yes it came as a surprise even for me), I've been looking at getting a Helix. Then the Amplifire 12 came up. Before that, I've never had heard of Atomic Amps, but after a dozen videos, I'm intrigued. The form factor neatly fits into a regular backpack, and it's almost half the price of the Helix.

 

The routing is simpler, the on-board editing seems complicated, there's no audio interface. But anyways, I won't be doing any crazy routing, prefer editing on the computer, and already have an audio interface. So while I REALLY want the Helix ('till it hurts a little), I'm having a hard time justifying the price after comparison.

 

Another problem is that there is hardly any info on the official website, and I'm not too familiar with the company.

 

What do you guys think about the Helix vs. Amplifire 12, as an all-in-one direct to FoH solution, primarily for a church setting?

 

Well, church settings can differ quite a bit actually.  I play in a church setting as well, but I know I couldn't do some of the stuff I need to do with the Amplifire due to it's limitations on signal path construction in comparison to the Helix.  But I'm pretty sure I'm at the far end of what people do in a church setting.  For most of the typical contemporary praise songs, I'd suspect the Amplifire might work pretty well.  But if you get fairly diverse you might feel a bit limited.

 

Bottom line, it's never a problem to use fewer features than what's provided.  But it's pretty hard if you need more features than what's provided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm you guys are starting to blur the line between "essential" and "icing on the cake"

 

It also got me in the "future-proofing" trap. Like what if I didn't like the overdrives or reverbs, and end up upgrading them with pedals in the future, which would total as much as a Helix,and defeat the purpose of an all-in-one unit?

 

I quite enjoyed the Helix that I tried at a store. Especially the OD blocks which are much better than the Pod's, which had a "make-every-guitar-sound-a-certain-way" thing that I didn't like.

 

But I also like the concept of the effects in Amplifire, where you have a few effects types but a whole bunch of parameters to get the sound you want. Sort of like how I work with VST plugins. Like why have 100 compressors when you can have 3-4 that can do all that those 100 can, given adjustable treshold, ratio, attack, hold, release & knee? The justification by saying it's because the original pedals didn't have them gets old. It's a modern processor; sure you can model the good qualities of popular pedals, but it makes no sense to copy its limitations or unpleasant bits.

 

Ideally I would get them both, but the first word of this sentence doesn't agree with my situation . Anybody else having the same dilemma?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...