Jump to content
Marcus2323

Is there an auto-wah?

Recommended Posts

I read on here where someone mentions trying the auto-wah. I can't for the life of me find it. Could someone point me in the right direction to the auto-wah?

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On filters, the murant filter and auto filter, as well on legacy the tron up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks arislaf.....I'll have a look when I get home from work. I had been specifically looking for the word "wah" so that's why I didn't look at those.  lol :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like the auto filter much.

The Tron Up in the POD500 dind't work for me either, couldn't get anything useful from it.

 

The good news is that somehow the Tron Up in helix is wonderful. Works like charm an sounds great (to me).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found it useful to turn the mix level on these down to around 60-65%, especially when used on more distorted tones.   

On cleaner tones you can get away with higher mixes.

For a nice "clavinet" tone with cleaner and compressed tones, set the mixes closer to 40%.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found it useful to turn the mix level on these down to around 60-65%, especially when used on more distorted tones.   

 

On cleaner tones you can get away with higher mixes.

 

For a nice "clavinet" tone with cleaner and compressed tones, set the mixes closer to 40%.   

 

This is actually good advice with the regular wah. I think I got this from Glen Delaunne. put the mix at about 75%. gives it a little more organic sound for lack of a better word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do the same.   It's a free range wah.  

 

This is actually good advice with the regular wah. I think I got this from Glen Delaunne. put the mix at about 75%. gives it a little more organic sound for lack of a better word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be pedantic, the effects talked about here are Envelope Filters, not Auto-Wahs.

 

Auto-Wah is something like the SeekWah or something that goes on a timing basis. Envelope Filters are things like the Q-Tron (which is what you're probably after).

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be pedantic, the effects talked about here are Envelope Filters, not Auto-Wahs.

 

Auto-Wah is something like the SeekWah or something that goes on a timing basis. Envelope Filters are things like the Q-Tron (which is what you're probably after).

 

So true, they are theoretically not the same thing although there was a time where manufacturers were playing fast and loose with those names(maybe still are) and some probably produced envelope filters/'followers' that were labeled as "auto-wahs" or "touch-wahs"("touch"-wah being a better synonym for envelope filter). This was done probably to some extent depending on what name they thought would sell better or be more recognizable. As you say though, to comply with their original literal definitions, an envelope filter should vary with how the string is picked or the envelope of the source signal whereas an auto-wah should vary its timing according to something like the rate of an LFO or other often internal timing mechanism. Thanks for bringing this up 'cos I don't know if various manufacturers will ever adhere faithfully to these definitions.   :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×