Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content
Line 6 Community
Welcome to the Line 6 forums!
Apply to Join our Public Beta Testing Program!
Limited Support of Legacy Products
ideascale Retirement

bcnx

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Registered Products
    3

Recent Profile Visitors

465 profile views

bcnx's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. bcnx
    Hi, I just stumbled on my own old thread. The difference in firmware might jus the it. In the meantime I have bought a Kemper Profiling Amplifier. It blows my Line 6 products out of the park, but one needs to take the added price into account of course, BC
  2. bcnx
    I understand, but in that case they could simply get back to me with that exact statement. Now I get nothing. I think I will spend some time today in trying to get a similar sound on the Pro. If I succeed the bean can go to the Line 6 retirement home.
  3. bcnx
    I actually never did get an answer to my question from the Line 6 support team. Too bad. Things like good support grows loyal users. Anyway, thanks all for giving your thoughts and ideas. BC
  4. bcnx
    They take their time though - it was mentioned somewhere they would get back to me in 3 days, but it has been more than a week now. They probably are very busy because of the great success of their products, which I get ...
  5. bcnx
    Yes, that's what I'm waiting for. BC
  6. bcnx
    It's on the Studio setting unfortunately ...
  7. bcnx
    I'm still awaiting response from the Line 6 support team on this. Maybe they have a viable explanation ...
  8. bcnx
    It just says "Pedal", so I guess I have the older one. Was to be expected as the EPROM says 2.1, while it is my understanding that the latest EPROM version is 2.3.
  9. bcnx
    I also have the POD XT, but the sound is not half as good as the 2.0. I've read similar findings.
  10. bcnx
    @Silverhead: it matters because a have a very good patch on the 2.0. It is powerful, well rounded and fits perfect it in the mix. That's why I would like to keep it. @Phil: my 2.0 does not have USB port, so I guess I have an older 2.0.
  11. bcnx
    Well, if the patch is identical, shouldn't the sound be the same if the architecture is the same? Is the Pod Pro not the exact same device with the same amps, cabinets and effects, but engineered for use in studio (hence the higher number of connections)?
  12. bcnx
    OK; I opened the Pro and the EPROM is labelled version 1.3. Do more recent versions exist? Could that be the problem?
  13. bcnx
    I did not open the Pod Pro yet, but you may be on to something. The firmware showing on the Pro when you power on while holding the manual key says 1.3 but that may be different than what's on the EPROM. I will open the device later today. I don't suppose you can swap the EPROM between a 2.0 and a Pro?
  14. bcnx
    No, I'm testing with the analog outs currently and was planning to switch to digital once things were identical. Maybe switching to digital now can give me more insight into the problem. Another possibility of course is that one of the two devices performs simply with an error into it. Thanks for your input! BC
  15. bcnx
    No, then they are set correctly. Maybe I should continue using the 2.0 version, but the S/PDIF out from the Pro would be so nice to use, since my audio interface has a S/PDIF input. Any other ideas? I will compare the other patches as well to see if those are similar. Cheers, BC
×
×
  • Create New...