Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

mahnkiman

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Registered Products
    1

mahnkiman's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. @rd2rk - I can give this a shot once I actually have the Helix, but this confirms the setup is doable :) @DunedinDragon - You bring up some good points about keeping a dedicated audio interface. I haven't decided yet whether to ditch it and use the Helix for everything, or keep the functions separate. But I can see the pros/cons a bit better now. Thanks for your input!
  2. I'm looking at upgrading my recording and live performance setup, and the Helix LT is what I'm interested in. Since you can use the Helix LT as an audio interface, I might be able to streamline my setup even further since I wouldn't have to run a separate audio interface. For context, I use a laptop that runs a DAW (REAPER). Requirements: Amp modeling and FX loop (no brainer, the Helix does this) Output for a mono click track from my DAW (for the band's in-ear monitors). Output for a mono backing track from my DAW. MIDI output from my DAW to the Helix to change footswitches, presets, at certain points in certain songs. It seems like the Helix LT provides enough inputs and outputs for this. This attached shows what I THINK this should look like, but I could use help confirming this. I'm thinking the click track could come from the XLR mono output, or the #2 send, but I'm not sure if this is supported or not. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...