clay-man Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 What is the difference between these? Does the POD have 2 buffers? I set it to extra small, seems to work decently. I'm using ASIO4ALL so I can route output to Virtual Audio Cable. Works wonders. Just wondering though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjnette Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Buffer is your latency via POD , recording software and monitoring the result. Time in to time out. As far as I am aware going by other interfaces Direct monitoring is listening or monitoring at the interface on the way in and not after the computer program. You have a choice but to monitor already recorded material it has to do the round trip and this is known as full duplex. Asio4all has a bad wrap in some circles interfering with other interface asio drivers and system functioning. It pretty well makes any audio interface connected tot your computer a asio one and it can cause hell if your device has its own drivers.a doubling up. Not sure how it is now but the general consensus was don't use . It was originally used to make generic onboard consumer, non pro sound cards work in programs like cubase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clay-man Posted November 5, 2014 Author Share Posted November 5, 2014 Buffer is your latency via POD , recording software and monitoring the result. Time in to time out. As far as I am aware going by other interfaces Direct monitoring is listening or monitoring at the interface on the way in and not after the computer program. You have a choice but to monitor already recorded material it has to do the round trip and this is known as full duplex. Asio4all has a bad wrap in some circles interfering with other interface asio drivers and system functioning. It pretty well makes any audio interface connected tot your computer a asio one and it can cause hell if your device has its own drivers.a doubling up. Not sure how it is now but the general consensus was don't use . It was originally used to make generic onboard consumer, non pro sound cards work in programs like cubase. I know what latency is, but there are 2 buffer sizes in the POD configuration panel in control panel for windows. One is labeled ASIO Settings, with a dropdown box with numbers 128, 256, 512, etc. The second is a slider saying "extra small, medium, extra large" with the title "ToneDirect & USB Audio Streaming" They both seem to affect the latency. As for ASIO4ALL, I know you're supposed to use the driver your device comes with, but like I said, I like to route to multiple outputs, something almost all ASIO drivers can't do, but ASIO4ALL can, with low latency results. I use ASIO4ALL for streaming my guitar and music live. The question is, why is there 2 buffer settings and not one in the Line 6 Audio control panel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjnette Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Sounds like it is for non asio drivers ,WDM or MME , Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clay-man Posted November 6, 2014 Author Share Posted November 6, 2014 Sounds like it is for non asio drivers ,WDM or MME , Using the normal driver, both of them increase latency, so no. I just don't get what's the difference. There's obviously 2 buffers, but why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.