jazzpick

Yes, already sent it a few minutes ago, I got it from my bookmarks, thanks pal !

Thanks, what link?

Hi, Due to a confusion I mistakenly clicked in deauthorized my new pod hd and now it appear in my account as: POD HD 21PHD**************** pending ? 1 Dec 16 and "deauthorization pending" . Is there possible to cancel and reverse the authorization? If yes, what is the procedure? I did try un-register and registered the Pod again, which did alright, but the "deauthorization pending" status is still there. I am worry because I installed the (promo) HD Fully Loaded Bundle in my new pod hd and when I'm running license manager with my pod this msg pop up: "To Complete the deathorization process, you must remove purchazed Add-Ons from your device. Click the Remove button to remove these Add-Ons" I just want my POD back and authorized again in my account without lost my HD fully bundle pack, any help is welcome! Thanks.

bumping ..... :P I agree, suicide notes punching out gear, hurt the feelings of those whom sharing at most positive impressions of their favorite piece of gear, in the own forum brand field! that's like a war declaration :ph34r: but also there emerge an opportunity to review/check common sense, fairness and not least, manners and politeness. Reply quotes such as "everything coming from 'X brand' "is garbage" "crap" could be interpreted as an individual point of view, but also demonstrate ignorance and little forehead, plus an obvious bitterness, well away from a constructive position on the subject, especially and since is very difficult for an established brand like Roland or Boss messing around deceiving and folling millions of users, having among them thousands of outstanding producers, musicians and professionals in the area. Fortunately posters as Colonel Forbin and few more, place the stone of equity, fairness and valuable analysis, amid a outraged peat that simply reacts viscerally to a naive fool slap like Slooky hit. In my case, I am a proud user of LINE 6 gear from 16 years ago, including near of all POD series, POD HD for example has rewarded me with many hours of excellent performance. I've had my disappointments too, something that happens with all brands. Also I have Roland GR-55, GP-10, GT-100 etc just as I have had positive and negative experiences. But by the very mother of the universe I could never say the sound of the COSM amp / instruments / EFX is garbage junk. On the contrary, both LINE 6 and Roland / Boss, I have opened doors to the best of each. And both even, still it has much to learn from each other.

At July 18 2015, and still is incredible the absurd bypass mode in amp section of JM4. It seem like some kind of pillow pad is between the signal input and the out coming audio becoming sterile and lifeless. Bypass mode is absolutly pointless.

I can see Line 6 has not replied your question. Something has happened on other occasions when it is too obvious that they don't know how. JM4 is a intersting piece of gear showcasing particular details out of context, and even illogical ones, it has points almost intolerable to accept, given their cost and concept behind a great idea, even its appearance seem to promises things that are not there unfortunately. the JM4 performs very well as a practicing and study tool, jamming and as pusher for musical ideas. But it is incredibly amazing in 21st century, a unit manufactured by a prestigious firm, obviates something as important as having stereo outputs, a "detail" only justified and forgived in inexpensive and smaller stomp boxes in the looper market. While is cool that the JM4 has a separate output for the guitar, which gives a certain degree of flexibility, the absence of stereo outputs not only strongly limited it on estudio application and serious production areas, but also amputate the enjoyment of the looping experience. It is almost laughable joke in bad taste, to listen the bundled musically superb produced songs backing tracks and drum loops in MONO! that may be fine on a Spider Jam as a standard guitar amp main concept. It follows that possibly LINE 6 wanted to take advantage of industrial scraps left behind by the Spider Jam, for more profits. And even with the high price stamp , they failed this time in the initiative to contribute as they have done with many of its innovations, with the advancement of the music industry, and enjoyment of, perhaps too loyal users and lost the opportunity to create a wonderful device. They are so so many JM4 users complaining about the audio quality in forums, reviews and videos online. In the midst of some very few reviewes, including renowned artists, trying to bring out what they themselves hidden and sadly kept secret...the deep disappointment because of the subjective bad impression that causes the hearing, lacking sense of space of sterile mono from well produced stereo music. What thought they were making? a Mattel doll with one 8-bit speaker looped in "I'm hungry mama" ?? c'mom!! Worth here to note the only information stereo audio to be transmitted in the JM4 is the reverb efx, and monitoring from the Mp3 / CD input, which after being recorded is reproduced in... .yes, you guessed..as mono track. I do not intend to make a review now, it will come surely and plenty if details, just I want to express my personal disappointment about JM4, even my son left him forgotten prefering thousand times the applications on his Android phone, with stereo sound !!