muttley-ml

same here. I did the update to Floor and all went fine. Previously I was on 2.81, I backed up what I needed to, then updated to HX Edit 3.00. Once installed, on 2 doifferent Laptops (one Lenovo and one HP) if I connect Helix and run HX Edit 3.00 it doesn't work (on both). As a comparison, HXEdit2.81 worked flawlessly on both. I reinstalled a million times HXEdit, restarted, and all the rest but nothing... Please help me because I have to restore my backups. DO I have to reupdate also Helix? thanks a lot Luca

I'm curious about the reason why to plug a passive acoustic in the Return and not Guitar In (while it's clear about the Aux for active ones). I'll try for sure, but I'm intrigued to know the technical reason: impedance? headroom? I suppose the regulation f the Return would be Line, right? Thanks a lot L.

One question for those that use Helix with acoustic guitar: since I heard that the Tonedexter is the new Graal for acoustic sound and, as far as I understand, is kind of a profiler/matcher/IR creator, I was wondering if it's feasible to use the Tonedexter matching EQs/images in Helix. I bought 3Sigma D45 and Taka IRs and, while vastly superior to Mama Bear/Aura ones, they do not represent truthfully the character/punchiness/dryness of a great Mahogany Dread. The reason for my asking is that I'd really love to profile my (or "a") Martin D18: it seems there are no IRs for that guitar Thanks a lot L. Luc

New to Helix, and I use it also for acoustic. I'm heavily underwhelmed by IRs as well, unfortunately: I downloaded all the Mama Bear ones and Aura ones, loaded in Helix and tried them all: they all have a strange and annoying (and unremovable) resonance in the mids. the only way I can use some of them is to blend them very very low (15% maximum, 10% for 12 strings). I've had better results with para eq (slight boost at 100hz, heavy cut at 905 or 1200, slight boost between 4k and 10k). For reference, piezos in my acoustics are both Fishman SOB (only piezo portion used). Yet to try 3 Sigma ones...