Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

a914man

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by a914man

  1. I didn't know about IdeaScale, thanks!
  2. It's a problem that hasn't been resolved in good faith by Line 6. When anyone spends $1000-$1500 on a guitar processor they probably don't expect to find that they just need to be sure to keep the $9 Snark tuner clipped on their headstock, and I'd be in that group. So all of us inferior newbies should just acquiesce to the superiority of the long term members who see this issue as passe', and feel the need to comment as such? If you've been here a while maybe it's you that needs to get a grip, you don't have to reply to every "the tuner stinks" post with a snarky reply. Just keep scrolling, no post required. Some of you guys make me think of that one guy we all know with the hot girlfriend, who's a known cheater, he can't stand her infidelities, but she's so hot he can't give her up either. Face the truth, there's a problem. This is my 5th multi effect pedal since 1994, and I've played through two others that weren't mine, the Helix is the only one with a bad tuner, yes the only one. Well this is a piece of technology, and to quote Kenan Thompson "FIX IT!!"
  3. As long as there's new people getting HX's they too will be dissapointed in the onboard tuner. The long timers can just get "Frozen" with it, anyone familiar with multi-effects in the past 20 years will also think the tuner is wonky. I totally agree with Carbonfold. If they were going to have such a marginal tuner they should've just put a "tuner out" buss on it, so you know upfront the tuner stinks on ice. "We want good reverbs, OK; we want new boutique amp models, OK; we want better XYZ, OK; we want a better tuner, . . . . crickets
  4. Sad when the $300 Digitech RP1000 has a more usable on-board tuner.
×
×
  • Create New...