Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

Helix Native in MONO - less CPU intensive?


bc05
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey there all

 

I've been whittling down my Helix Floor presets for CPU economical usage in recordings via Helix Native in Cubase 9.5.

 

My question is: Is it less CPU intensive to record a DI via USB 7 or 8 to a MONO track and then apply Helix Native to that (using in the patch ONLY mono blocks - ie: NO reverb or Delay - in fact usually only a Compressor, Drive Stomp, Amp and one IR or Stock Cab)?

 

I don't wish to sacrifice tone of course but seems to me in a recording project double tracked guitars are usually 2 x Mono tracks left and right anyway with Reverbs etc added later to a Group track in mixing stage.

 

Any thoughts on best practice here?

 

Thanks!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does seem to be less CPU intensive to use a Mono instance. In fact, I usually set up a mono track, just using the  Helix Native amp-related stuff (similar to what you would do mic'ing an amp). So, mainly just amp, cab/IR blocks. Maybe some mono EQ or studio compressor. If I want to add stereo effects later (eg reverb, delay, etc) I do that when mixing using third party plug-ins on the mono guitar track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...