toko42 Posted July 31, 2020 Share Posted July 31, 2020 Hi there, it would be nice to be able to have the wet signal on one output and the dry signal on the other. As both are balanced one could leave the DI at home. Right now I would have to include an FX send to be able to do this which uses one block. Would this be possible? Many thanks toko42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brue58ski Posted July 31, 2020 Share Posted July 31, 2020 Another way would be to create a parallel path. PU the amp on one and all of the effects on the other. You can then put the amp anywhere in the effects path using a split. Then pan the Amp path Left and the effects path Right. This does mean leavng most of the blocks on the dry/amp path unused but I'm going to guess there will be enough for your purposes. You could also use path1 for the dry signal, pan it all the way to the left and path 2 for the effects signal panned all the way to the right. That's just two ways.There are probably others. I'm not home right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toko42 Posted July 31, 2020 Author Share Posted July 31, 2020 I usually use two paths to separate amp and anything else to keep a good low end. On a Stomp that's it... But thanks for the suggestion, I'll see what I can do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brue58ski Posted July 31, 2020 Share Posted July 31, 2020 Oh a stomp. I was refering to the floor Helix. Sorry, don't know how my suggestions may help.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicksteinborn Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 If you're talking about splitting a signal to have an amp/cab sim on one side and not on the other, I pull my IR to a parallel path and then pan the signals in the little summing block immediately after it. You just have to have cables plugged into both outputs as otherwise it will sum to mono. That way I don't have to set up a send and use another block. I've been sending the IR to the PA/IEMs and plugging the other side with the amp sim/no cab sim into a Twin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toko42 Posted August 1, 2020 Author Share Posted August 1, 2020 No, I want to use one mixer channel for a clean signal and another one for the wet one. There are usually enough inputs available on my Behringer X32 and thus I could record a dry signal while still sending a wet one to the PA and alter the effects later if they don't sound good. But maybe this may work, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassbene Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 There is no way around using a parallel path (which you can't because you already use it for other parallel processing) or the FX send you mentioned, which consumes one block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.