Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

Have you product developers at Helix considered a Tube PowerCab?


guitargar
 Share

Recommended Posts

Even though I have the dream rig with the Helix, JTV89F and stereo 112 plus PowerCabs, the only thing lacking in my sound are tubes in the amp. I do have a DT25.  It sounds great.  Your best amp by far.  Which makes me wonder why you didn't keep going in that direction.  However, I have an older one and it doesn't play nice with the DT25/50 remote template on the Helix.  I'm running the latest Helix firmware 3.5 and I've even used Line Monkey to update the DT25 to its latest firmware version. Yet, after doing that, I still have no controls from the Helix concerning the topology, the tube and class type switching.  Basically, the only thing I can do is run a 1/4" cable from the ext amp out into the foot switch input to change between channel A & B.  I get some humming on channel B when going directly into the front of the amp input from the line out on the Helix, and that's even with a noise gate in my signal chain.  Channel A sounds great.  I've tried the 4 cable method utilizing FX loop, but I get some reverb weirdness and extra artifacts noise when changing snapshots with high gain channel B settings, especially when trails are on. In spite of all that, the tube sound is awesome.  Even though I really like the PowerCabs and that "in the room feel" on most of the stuff I program, the overtone presence is not there like it is with a tube amp, and the overall sound gets very squashy in live settings when I need to push the amp.  It winds up not cutting through as much in the mix.  The best solution would be a tube PowerCab!!!  Then I could have all of the wonderful benefits of all the programming options, plus that great tube sound!  There's no reason why you developers can't offer us the best of both worlds, so we don't have to settle for less than that perfect sound when tubes are in the amp.  I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Thanks for your time and attention, and, hopefully, this is worthy of your consideration. Take care!

 

Gary L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2023 at 12:59 AM, guitargar said:

Even though I have the dream rig with the Helix, JTV89F and stereo 112 plus PowerCabs, the only thing lacking in my sound are tubes in the amp. I do have a DT25.  It sounds great.  Your best amp by far.  Which makes me wonder why you didn't keep going in that direction.  However, I have an older one and it doesn't play nice with the DT25/50 remote template on the Helix.  I'm running the latest Helix firmware 3.5 and I've even used Line Monkey to update the DT25 to its latest firmware version. Yet, after doing that, I still have no controls from the Helix concerning the topology, the tube and class type switching.  Basically, the only thing I can do is run a 1/4" cable from the ext amp out into the foot switch input to change between channel A & B.  I get some humming on channel B when going directly into the front of the amp input from the line out on the Helix, and that's even with a noise gate in my signal chain.  Channel A sounds great.  I've tried the 4 cable method utilizing FX loop, but I get some reverb weirdness and extra artifacts noise when changing snapshots with high gain channel B settings, especially when trails are on. In spite of all that, the tube sound is awesome.  Even though I really like the PowerCabs and that "in the room feel" on most of the stuff I program, the overtone presence is not there like it is with a tube amp, and the overall sound gets very squashy in live settings when I need to push the amp.  It winds up not cutting through as much in the mix.  The best solution would be a tube PowerCab!!!  Then I could have all of the wonderful benefits of all the programming options, plus that great tube sound!  There's no reason why you developers can't offer us the best of both worlds, so we don't have to settle for less than that perfect sound when tubes are in the amp.  I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Thanks for your time and attention, and, hopefully, this is worthy of your consideration. Take care!

 

Gary L

 

You're talking to yourself. Nobody from L6 hangs out here, and even if by accident someone from L6 happened to see your post, you wouldn't get an answer, it's just not how they roll.

 

FWIW - not everybody wants their sound colored by tubes, which will change their sound over time (sometimes over a few hours at a gig on a hot day), are fragile, expensive and will eventually fail and have to be replaced.

Also, the DT25 weighs 47lbs, the Catalyst100 weighs 32lbs., the Powercab 112+ weighs 36 lbs.

10-15lbs might not SOUND like much, but add that to your one-armed Farmer's Carry. Yes, it matters.

 

Die-hard tube-heads love their tubes for the reasons you mentioned, but that matters most at the amp's "sweet spot" which is louder than many of us ever get to play these days.

 

Anyhow, I'm pretty sure that a "tube Powercab" has been suggested, go to Ideascale, do a search and VOTE for it, or post a new idea if it hasn't already been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2023 at 1:13 AM, Hellandfrt said:

That is battling. I was stunned by your affiliation. I'm happy to see a particularly subject. Altruisticly go to my blog and read it.

 

???

 

OK, you've got me totally battled! I suspect Google translate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...