optofonik Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 I watched this video and it made me wonder about the wisdom of just inserting one into the other's FX loop. While he does verbally explain why he thinks 4 cable is better than running them in series he doesn't go into detail with any examples of why using an FX loop block would be a disadvantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rd2rk Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 I didn't watch the video, but I see no advantage to putting the HXS in the HXFX Loop. I call clickbait. For that matter, I see little advantage to using HXS+HXFX vs Helix Floor/LT except a small size advantage and, if you're using an EXP Pedal, that's minimal. Helix Floor/LT - ONE (AD/DA(IN)-DA/AD(OUT)) conversion avoids all extra latency and potential tone loss. Also has more external routing options. Helix Floor/LT/HXS have auto impedance - necessary for authentic tone from certain FX, irrelevant if you're going wireless. HXS>HXFX = 2 AD/DA-DA/AD conversions vs 4 conversions using 4cm = less latency and less tone loss vs 4cm. FX Loop can add a small bit of noise. Saves a Block on the HXS vs 4cm. Less cables = less potential failure points, quicker setup at the gig. Finally, you don't gain anything in DSP vs using both paths connected in serial on Helix/LT. Get a Helix Floor/LT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.