Community: Message List

Re: not gonna be around here as much...

support@line6.com — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 09:42:46 GMT

Hey Bobbo,

Thank you so much for all the help you have offered to all of us here.

Wishing you all the best for the new job and enjoy being a dad!!!

Your kid looks so cute

Hope to still see you around every now and then!

Lars

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:50:07 GMT

I just tried this and it works so nicely!!! Wow, I'm amazed at all the possibilities.

Would there be any disadvantage in using the FX Loop for recording a DI over the 'dual path (with one path dry)' approach?

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:52:39 GMT

Thanks!

Yet another way I had not known of.

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:21:08 GMT

Thanks !

I will look into this and see what kind of interface might be interesting. But honestly I am not sure if I will even need that, I am still golden with the possibility I just discovered of using a dual amp patch with one signal path dry.

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:13:44 GMT

Wow, another thing I did not know. Thanks!

My audio interface is a Line 6 UX2, but it does not have an SPDIF input. Maybe this option would be worth considering an interface that has an spdif input.

The way you explained it would be possible to record both the patched signal through one output and the dry signal through the spdif output simultaneously?

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:32:04 GMT

Wow, thanks for that. I had not evne considere re-amping with the HD500 itself. Even more flexibility here. Amazing unit!!!!

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:21:48 GMT

Thanks!

That is good news!

I'm planning on recording this way form now on, but I do intend to use the HD patch-tone, but IF for whatever reason I should decide to use a different sound after the fact that I recorded, it's just great to have the option of applying amp/cab sims (like Pod farm) to the DI signal!

Re: recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:59:59 GMT

Oh, yes, I did not even think about that.

Would this take away quality of the signal or lead to an audible difference? Or is it just a latency issue?

recording a patched signal and dry DI signal with the HD500 simultaneously

support@line6.com — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:12:51 GMT

Hi,

I know this is probably old news for most of you, but I have just recently discovered the possibility to record a DI signal simultaneously along with my patch-signal using a dual tone patch on my HD 500 where one signal path has the FX and amp of my choice and the other path remains blank for the DI which I later may use for software amp/cab sims or re-amping..

Tried it for the first time today and it works like a charm!

I had already been considering getting an HD pro for its dry-out but now that I can basically do the same on my HD500 I am a happy camper.

For a 'real' dual amp patch (a patch where I use different amp models on each signal path) this won't work because you need one signal path to remain blank for the DI-signal, but most of my patches are non-dual amp patches anyway!

Lars

Re: song I recorded using my HD500 (instrumental metal) - feedback appreciated

support@line6.com — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:52:49 GMT

Thank you very much! I appreciate the feedback and the kind words!