<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Community: Message List</title>
    <link>http://line6.com/support/index.jspa?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 4.5.7.0 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-30T06:51:02Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Variax Individual String Volume per Model - Future yes or no?</title>
      <link>http://line6.com/support/message/173884?tstart=0#173884</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:18d5de1f-f1fc-4ff6-a5dd-687cbf49312a] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a Variax 700 and I need to be able to switch strings on and off on the fly, basically using different models with different string volume settings.&amp;#160; I use it in a non-traditional way, and this options is the only way I can do what I need to do.&amp;#160; Will this be possible in future versions (JT) of the Variax/Workbench?&amp;#160; If not, what is the thinking on this feature?&amp;#160; It seems pretty obvious that users would want to change string levels per model; Is there a physical limitation on this?&amp;#160; If not, is source code available for hacking?&amp;#160; Thanks for any response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dustin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:18d5de1f-f1fc-4ff6-a5dd-687cbf49312a] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>support@line6.com</author>
      <guid>http://line6.com/support/message/173884?tstart=0#173884</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-08-30T06:51:02Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 years, 9 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Separate output of looper sound possible in m13?</title>
      <link>http://line6.com/support/message/127845?tstart=0#127845</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:e3057d6f-b3d0-42c9-9607-254d7c948d41] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have the same need.&amp;#160; No matter how I have the looper set, the loop wants to play out of both outputs simulataneously.&amp;#160; I want the loop to work in true stereo, so I can lay a part from the right input, and have it play through the right output only.&amp;#160; Then I want to switch to the left input and lay overdubs that only play from the left output.&amp;#160; When looper is post fx, stereo fx should sum to mono, allowing overdubs to contain fx and only play out of the corresponding mono output.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another gripe is that the playback volume of the loop is never as loud as the original signal.&amp;#160; This is a major bummer that I can't seem to find a way around.&amp;#160; Anyone have a suggestion for this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dustin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:e3057d6f-b3d0-42c9-9607-254d7c948d41] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:40:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>support@line6.com</author>
      <guid>http://line6.com/support/message/127845?tstart=0#127845</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-03-12T09:40:13Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 2 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

