Skip navigation
775 Views 9 Replies Latest reply: Aug 12, 2011 7:23 PM by BuleriaChk RSS
BuleriaChk Just Startin' 21 posts since
Nov 6, 2007
Currently Being Moderated

Aug 5, 2011 5:53 PM

No Visual Level Indicators in Pod HD Bean LCD screen?

I already own a PodXT with all the model packs, but I had abandoned Line 6 for my GT-10 a couple of years ago

However, I also just upgraded to Pod Farm 2.51. and it ocurred to me that there are no visual level indicators in the PodXT.

 

1. That said, much against my better judgement, I just ordered a Pod HD Desktop, which will arrive here next week.  After reading the manuals, I don't see any level indicators for the Pod HD Bean either, or did I miss something.  And if not, why not (seems such an obvious thing to avoid overdriving the preamps)....

 

2.  I am somwhat disappointed by the lack of an aux in in the bean.... luckily, most of my amps have an aux in, but still......

 

3. There doesn't seem to be a way to monitor wet, but record dry (other than SP/Dif which requires another interface.  Seems kind of dumb....

 

Oh well, I have 45 days from when it arrives to ring it out, but these caveats don't give me a warm, fuzzy feeling about my purchase.....

  • silverhead Expert Line 6 User 9,592 posts since
    Apr 1, 2009

    BuleriaChk wrote:

     

    ....

     

    3. There doesn't seem to be a way to monitor wet, but record dry (other than SP/Dif which requires another interface.  ...

    You can do this by using the HD Bean dual path capabilities. Set up one path for your wet signal and one for your dry. For the dry path do not use any amp or FX - just allow the input guitar signal to pass straight through to the Outputs. Then use the mixer to seperate the paths (one full L and the other full R). In your recording software, select only the dry path for recording.

      • silverhead Expert Line 6 User 9,592 posts since
        Apr 1, 2009

        That's correct. Bear in mind, though, that if you are using your Pod HD strictly as an audio device for Pod Farm you could use a much less costly audio interface for this purpose with Pod Farm 2.5. The Pod HD has much better amp modeling which you are not taking advantage of if you pass your dry guitar signal to Pod farm for processing.

         

        But yes, it is an alternative.

          • Rowbi Expert Line 6 User 7,745 posts since
            Nov 25, 2006

            BuleriaChk wrote:

             

            Actually, what I'm kind of hoping is the MIDI will drive the GUI of PodFarm as a control surface....

            Also, I'm not using the HD as STRICTLY an interface, since I plan on using it live (I am sitting when I play, with the Pod on a tabletop), and it has a mic input.  So I envision using it by itself or with a laptop (since the HD has no vocal processing yet - but I'll have to check that....

             

            Anyway, it will be here day after tomorrow, so I can begin experimenting.  I think the REAL bottom line is if the Tube Preamp effect and reverbs are better than Pod Farm or the XT.... (I'm not interested that much in the amps...), so the X3 may be a better choice....

             

            Anyway, I'll report back, and thanks for the insights........ 

            well I'm not 100% sure but I thought that the bean didn't have all the MIDI functionality that the HD500 has.  there's no MIDI ports on the HD bean, and while it could go over the USB cable, I'm just not sure how much midi it will pass to POD Farm 2.5 (which does respond well to MIDI).

             

            As such, in the true sense of a control surface for POD farm, that';s not what it's meant to do.  if you want a midi control surface for POD Farm, there are likely many things out there that can do it well... I'm not so sure about the bean though.

             

            Just going back to your initial thread, it does sound a little like you're twisted your own arm to buy the HD Bean... is it really what you need?

             

            As far as your comment about the X3.... the X3 tones are better than the XT by a little bit, but the X3 tones and FX aren't as good as the POD HD amp tones and FX.  on a true FX point of view, the POD HD would be the better machine than all previous PODs or POD Farm.....

            on amp sims there's a debate where the POD HD is better with less amp models that are all higher quality, or the X3 which is lesser quality but more amps to choose from.  for me the quality wins out, but you're not after amp models so I wont talk about this any more.

             

            hope this helps you make up your mind

             

            Cheers

             

            Rowbi

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)