-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
You see what you've started? All these calm, nice people who would otherwise fill this forum with friendly advice and motivational cheer have been pushed to tear each other apart, limb by limb. I hope you are satisfied. The blood is on your hands.
Oh and the official release date of the new Pod HD bean/pro/500 firmware is going to be sometime between Monday and Friday, if it exists. And don't ask - I don't know which week.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
meambobbo wrote:
You see what you've started? All these calm, nice people who would otherwise fill this forum with friendly advice and motivational cheer have been pushed to tear each other apart, limb by limb. I hope you are satisfied. The blood is on your hands.....
Not at all. The blood-letting was inevitable and entirely predictable. I simply provided a single killing-field rather than have the whole community space soaked.

Like I said in the opening, it's all great fun and provides much entertainment for the reader. With any luck, the main combatants will focus all their energies here until the update is released, so in the meantime the rest of us can participate elsewhere in the forum.
It's all just an insidious misdirection on my part.....
... oh, and don't forget that doing things like this is part of the fanboy agreement that all Experts have to sign with line 6......
I'm not allowed to express my own opinions about anything here....
- Report Abuse
-
Like (1)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
silverhead wrote:
The blood-letting was inevitable and entirely predictable. I simply provided a single killing-field rather than have the whole community space soaked.

Firmwaremageddon.!
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
haha... I try to keep things civilized, this isnt the xbox forums afterall

My whole thing was pointing out its a bad business move, regardless of their reasons for doing it.. thats all..
Understandably, some get annoyed just because they lump me into the group of people that feel entitled to everything under the sun blah blah..
I was never here to make a claim i feel i deserve it.. i want it, yesterday preferably..lol.. but whatever.. Their announcement on facebook was full of ****** off HD500 users and who can blame them? Thats where the fanboy thing came in.. Just because you may feel cab DEP's are more important then amp models, doesnt mean others will too.. It really just seems like L6 fans are making excuses when L6 cant be bothered to defend their own actions to its customers..
I have no personal or vested interest in this company, i really dont.. But the basic laws of retail go.. the 300 gets you in the door, the 400 has everything the 300 has and more! the 500 has everything the 400 has and more!!
thats their business model... or it was... Nobody should ever be faced with downgrading equipment simply to get what they want.. neither line6 or anyone else has ever followed this mixed up business model.. and there really is no legitimate reason that makes this ok. at least i havent seen/heard one yet.
its not about my feelings or how i use my 500 or if i can live without the new models... its simple logic
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
Hey, no problem Paul. It's great to have different opinions expressed here. Like others have said, it would be a pretty boring place without that.
I respect your opinion about the business model. I have a different opinion, as I outlined earlier. When a new firmware update is ready for release, it is perfectly legitimate to include any new amp models that are available at the time of release, regardless of the product involved. I think that is a legitimate reason, and explanation, for the fact that the HD300/400 currently have amp models that the other models don't.
Just because I happen to have a tag associated with my name does not invalidate my opinion, nor does it make me a nazi or a fanboy.
You don't have to downgrade your equipment to get what you want - you just have to wait a bit. The HD300/400 users waited a long time. Hopefully the higher-model owners won't have to wait nearly as long.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
I think that is bad the situation because is being a "little figth", but I think (in a humble way) the problem here is:
-The fail is think about the owners when the problems is in the series: 300/400 VS 500.
Is simple, the company can´t do more amps, for example, to the "entry" products and less to the "top end" product, because is a "temporary disadvantage" in that part.
Is nothign about to be happy or angry with the owners, or something similar, all is peace&love. It is just different, is bussines, and they are doing a bad move, is easy to see and know that, only in this forum you can find clients with all their rigth (me too) to say or ask; Why if I buyed the top level version I don´t have the SLO100 now?
The correct move could give the update with the SLO100 to the 300/400&500 int the same time, but never, never only to the lowest series because if you pay for more you have all the rigth too say that you want the SLO. Remember that the marketing strategy, watching the web, is something like, "buy HD500 because you have so many options more in all sense than to the other series".
Is not a problem about owners, is about level of series in HD, and like they have client that used more money (because they wanted more option, for necessity, funny, more effects, more amps, I don´t know, the reason depend to the client) and are not happy... so: very bad bussines move...
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
alfmetal70 wrote:
... so: very bad bussines move...
Again, I respectfully disagree. I think there is no good reason NOT to give HD product owners the full set of available amps at the time their product firmware update is released. That was done with the HD500/Desktop/Pro back in April of this year when they got several new amps that the HD300/400 owners waited three months for. Now it was done with the HD300/400 release, meaning the HD500/Desktop/Pro have to wait a while. Seems consistent and fair to me.
Remember, the main product differences are in the overall features and i/o capabilities. So far, all products have received (and presumably will continue to receive) the same amp models within a relatively short time period. It's just a matter of timing, not product differentiation.
I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong - I'm simply saying our different opinions are both valid.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
I know this was intended as a satyrical thread but... some hours ago in the official Line 6 page on Facebook they said:
HD500 users: your update is coming too. We can't say precisely how many weeks away it is, but the team is working on it. We would have liked to release all PODs at the same time, but since the 300 and 400 were finished first we let them loose. We'll let you know when we're getting close
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
Thanks for the update - glad to hear it! ... so I guess now the speculation is some number of weeks.......

- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
silverhead wrote:
Hey, no problem Paul. It's great to have different opinions expressed here. Like others have said, it would be a pretty boring place without that.
I respect your opinion about the business model. I have a different opinion, as I outlined earlier. When a new firmware update is ready for release, it is perfectly legitimate to include any new amp models that are available at the time of release, regardless of the product involved. I think that is a legitimate reason, and explanation, for the fact that the HD300/400 currently have amp models that the other models don't.
Just because I happen to have a tag associated with my name does not invalidate my opinion, nor does it make me a nazi or a fanboy.
You don't have to downgrade your equipment to get what you want - you just have to wait a bit. The HD300/400 users waited a long time. Hopefully the higher-model owners won't have to wait nearly as long.
I think i may have brought other threads into my somewhat harsh post.. It wasnt solely at you or anyone.. Just as you knew people (like me i guess lol) would ***** about it, i knew people would blindly defend them.. I have been helped greatly in the past by many of the "experts" and i really didnt mean to make it out to be hostile but it may have leaned that way.. i like a good debate!! haha..
They have actually announced their reasoning now so this is all besides the point... But i am of the opinion that the lower models should never have more of anything then the 500/pro.. It would be like the old pocket pod having more amps then the X3.. the reason to buy the most expensive model was to get everything! not just for the extra io options (which i dont use anyways) and certainly not to wait while people that paid almost half what you did can get some freebies that you have to wait for..
i suppose thats just my expectation but it was a logical one to make imo.. but i cant help but laugh when i see that comparison page.. 29 amps for 300 or 25 for 550!!
lol.. i mean yeah, there IS more to it then that... but from a headline point of view, it will make the customer scratch their head i bet.. and likely lead most of them to the least expensive unit.. Higher models get continued development and the lower models are lucky to get whatever they get... lol.. might be a biased point of view but if thats truely not the case, i wasted $200 getting the 500.. lol
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
Triryche wrote:
toneman2121 wrote:
THAT DOES IT! IF I DON'T GET MY UPDATE SOON...
!! I'LL DROP MY BEAN OUT THE WINDOW! i live in the basement
LOL!!!
I don't live in the basement (at least no most of the time), but my Magic Bean does.
I wonder if we were to through it out the window if it would grow an HD Beanstalk that would lead us to a Golden firmware update!!

we'd have to get past the line6 ogre-monkey first
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
actually i live in the attic
TheRealZap wrote:
toneman2121 wrote:
i live in the basement
in your parents basement? going to write a mean blog?
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
EnzoHeavenly wrote:
After reading all of this, I understand why 500 users (as myself) are ****** off.
I mean... as it has been said before, the flagship is meant to be the first to get the updates. It happens with other kind of products as well (as cellphones, tablets, computers, etc...). Even though doing this could generate complaints (you know, look at what happened to the last update for the JTVariax, people loved the new acoustic models but hated the 12-string models... Line 6 had to release a new firmware to kinda fix this).
I really can't understand why they decided to release it for the 300/400 series. I don't really mind as long as we don't have to wait over a month or two. Maybe they were writing the new firmware for the HD300/400 when the other team had finished writing the new amp models. That could be a simple and clean explanation.
Now, as a HD500 user... I DO think Line6 should prioritize it's high end modeler or, in cases like this, give an approx. time of release for the update. "Soon" is not good enough, sorry. I have always been supportive with Line6 but there are things that should never happen in business. Just look at Google, they will release their new OS (4.1 a.k.a. Jelly Bean) in their OWN new tablet, the Google Nexus 7 (which is their flagship, meant to be the Amazon Kindle Fire rival -or killer-), and THEN will extend the upgrade for the people currently using Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0.3), and after that... to those using Gingerbread (2.3). IMHO, thats how it should be...
But anyway, as someone else said, we shouldn't be ungrateful. Line6 is giving us more than we actually were supposed to get, so I'm happy with that. At least we ain't paying for FX bundles, if you know what I mean

The only question I have is... why can't we have the Bronze Master (featured in the FX Infusion 2.0 for spider valve amps). I would even pay for it xD
lol.. i was going to use the same argument.. I bought the Galaxy Nexus for that reason and am happily running Jelly Bean!
I didnt buy my HD500 for the variax support.. or the XLR or spdif etc... I bought it because i didnt want to be sitting there 6 months or a year down the road, looking at some cool new feature that was only available for the 500/pro and thinking "crap..shoulda got the 500"
It is the flagship model... I assumed all development work would be done for it, and THEN trickle down to the lower-end models where possible.. I thought it was completely fair to make the 300/400 users wait for 2.0.. not to be mean, but they paid half what i did in some cases.. common sense kinda tells those customers they will take a backseat to people that bought the top models..
their long wait for 2.0 only hints at the wait we now face im afraid.. it seems to me they completely screwed themselves when developing these units, things like models should easily swap between them but the timeframe's L6 has been using seem to indicate the opposite.. that models and FW changes are completely independent of eachother
all my opinion.. everyone will look at this a different way...
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
It is the flagship model... I assumed all development work would be done for it, and THEN trickle down to the lower-end models where possible.. I thought it was completely fair to make the 300/400 users wait for 2.0.. not to be mean, but they paid half what i did in some cases.. common sense kinda tells those customers they will take a backseat to people that bought the top models..
I owned the HD300 before selling it and buying the HD500 because I get tired quickly of being treated as second class based on the money I spent. As much as I'm eager to get the update for my HD 500 now, I think line 6 made a very smart decision releasing the update to the lower models. They really set themselves apart from other companies and restored the faith to most hobyiest and hard working musicians.
I think the HD500 is an insane value and a bargain considering what it offers, still there are many of us outhere that sometimes can't fit the HD500 in their budget, yet line 6 is showing appreciation for those who spent less. It's brilliant and I honestly love it. If you step back a abit, you will realize that the HD500 as it stands today isn't really lacking anything from a guitar palyers's stand point. The addional updates will come in time and they're just a bonus not a necescity. The more I spend time playing and ignoring the updates, the less I feel that the updates are really that necessary.
When I owned the HD300, I thought it was great that I didn't have to spend that much to get the basic tones that others who did pay double what I paid had access to, and when line 6 gave updates to 500 I did feel abandoned. If I couldn't fit the 500 in my budget, I would have been more upset when the 500 got the 2.0 first. In a perfect world everyone should get the update the same time, but if it can't be done I don't mind alternating. the way I look at it, the timing of the update issue, since I honestly don't think the updates are really that pressing, is a very minor issue and a little price to pay considering that having access to similar technology from other companies involves spending double at least. Honestly every one should be supportive of Line 6 even adopting a business model that makes cutting edge technology available to the masses! That's why I always respected line 6. How many can afford an AXE or a Kemper? Let's be realistic here, the HD series can stand it's ground against both and provide more functionlity at a fraction of the price. I've heard many HD500 and 300 sounding better than AXEII so the update is no longer a pressing isse for me.
- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
-
Currently Being ModeratedRe: OFFICIAL SPECULATION THREAD re: Release date of POD HD500/Desktop/Pro v2.x
I'd like to hear the new amps through a HD500. Has anyone tried to connect his HD300 to the FX-Loop of his HD500 to hear how it sounds? But wait! I need another firmware update. I need a seperation of amp sims and cab/mic sims for my HD500, so I can listen to the new amps with cab DEPs!

- Report Abuse
-
Like (0)
Actions
More Like This
- Retrieving data ...
Incoming Links
-
About
-
Follow
Stay in the mix and in the know.
Subscribe
Latest offers, special deals and insider updates.