Skip navigation
814 Views 5 Replies Latest reply: Sep 28, 2012 10:30 AM by ggz123 RSS
ggz123 Just Startin' 8 posts since
Aug 8, 2012
Currently Being Moderated

Aug 19, 2012 1:44 PM

M20D and Studiolive 16.4.2 comparisons

I am loving this mixer.  Most shows our 5 piece band play I run the live sound.  I have found the pre-sets are very close to being good to go, the effects top notch and the ease and recording quality excellent.

 

This is my first Line 6 product and it is replacing my Presonus Studio live16.4.2, which is a very good digital mixer as well. If any of you are interested, here is a quick comparison that I have found....

 

Pros...

1.  M20D has a much smaller foot print and seems about 1/3 lighter in weight making it much easier to transport and set up.

2.  IMHO, the effects (4 vs 2 on the STL) are of a much highter quality.

3.  The option of "tweak" vs. "deep tweak" make is simple to use for the beginner or experienced sound guy. 

4.  THE RECORDING!!!!  The quality is better, the options to record to SDRAM is awesome and you don't need a laptop/pc to do so.  The tracks are pre-effects so you can simply import and edit in your favorite DAW.  I use Sony Acid Pro 7.

5.  As stated prior, most of the pre-sets seems pretty much plug and play and require little tweaking for a live performance/gig.

6.  The auto trim is great and a god send for instruments when recording is being done.  However, I will start a new discussion after this regarding auto-trim and vocals....

7.  Sound can be run via iPad from a someone in the audience.  Same with the STL, however no laptop and wireless router is needed with the M20D. Just the suggested wifi USB adapters.

 

Cons (relatively speaking)

1.  4 aux outs vs. 6 on the STL.  Not a real issue for our band due to the fact 2 of them members share a mono mix when we use are IEMs.  This may be a problem for other bands using IEMs and want several stereo aux mixes.

2.  Only a couple of WiFi adapters will work on the M20D.  I have the Engenius.  The Linksys 1000AE is no longer sold by local electronic stores as it has been replaced by the 1200AE and above.  More WiFi compatibility will hopefully be available with later O/S releases.

2.  The M20D does not come with rack mount ears as does the STL.

3.  Cost - $2500 vs $1900.  However, I believe the extra money is worth it. 

 

Also, the first unit I received was defective.  It has a flickering screen and a USB port that wouldn't function.  Line 6 quickly helped resolve the issue and orchestrated shipping me a new unit overnight at no cost.  I have since used the current mixer the past 2 weekends with no issues at all.

 

Hope this is helpful.

  • line6jonb Line 6 Support 47 posts since
    Jun 11, 2012
    Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 20, 2012 3:45 PM (in response to ggz123)
    Re: M20D and Studiolive 16.4.2 comparisons

    Thank you very much for the comparison and review.  We are very pleased that you have had so much success after the prior unit's malfunction.  By the way, that unit was an isolated incident.  Happy performing.

  • superflybass Just Startin' 1 posts since
    Mar 28, 2007
    Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 10, 2012 9:07 PM (in response to ggz123)
    Re: M20D and Studiolive 16.4.2 comparisons

    so are you still happy with it  anything that you believe you are missing in the line 6 unt  I am thinking about getting one after our line6 rep showed us his

  • dkleiner Just Startin' 2 posts since
    Sep 24, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 18, 2012 6:31 PM (in response to ggz123)
    Re: M20D and Studiolive 16.4.2 comparisons

    I am looking to move up from an Allen&Heath Zed22FX to a Stagescape or the 16.4.2. We are a six-piece band that uses Bose 1 towers (2) and four Bose bass bins. We mix from the stage but are musicians, not engineers. The more I read, the more I am intrigued by the Soundscape.

     

    How has your unit been working for you?

    • antonioctd Just Startin' 34 posts since
      Apr 11, 2006
      Currently Being Moderated
      Sep 19, 2012 5:09 AM (in response to dkleiner)
      Re: M20D and Studiolive 16.4.2 comparisons

      Best feature of the StageScape M20d

       

      Ok, I'll make a bold statement:

       

      The M20d is the only mixer that will make you sound better even without using it at the GIG!

       

       

      I've been GIGing and rehearsing with the M20d for a little while now.

      The best thing that happened it that my both my bands are playing better! 

       

      How that happens?

       

      We record all the rehearsals and gigs in multitrack. Then I'll take the mixer home and fine tune the mix.

      So our live mixes are getting better and better because they are mixed with time and patience just like a studio mix.

      I make every thing sound great without touching the main out DSP. I use that to correct for the PA and room at the gig. 

       

      Also, I'll have all the time, piece and quiet to evaluate all the performance!

      I'll make notes about what I think needs rehearsal and correction and send the mixes to my band mates via e-mail so that they can draw their own conclusions.

       

      Then, I'll send to each one a mix with their track way louder so they have a solid reference of what they've done.

      And a mix without their part so they can use it as a baking track to practice at home!

       

      All this process put's a little more workload on my shoulders.

      But both bands are progressing at an amazing pace! It's incredible!

       

      This thing (the M20d) is amazing because is the first mixer that also makes the source (band) sound better!

       

      So, even if you play a gig with rented or local sound and don't use thee M20d. You will still sound better because of it.

      Because it helped you rehearsing and improving your band's performance!

      Amazing!

       

      Thanks Line6

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)