Skip navigation
1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Previous Next 34349 Views 102 Replies Latest reply: Sep 24, 2011 11:35 AM by Colin2113 RSS Go to original post
  • jason367 Just Startin' 10 posts since
    Aug 24, 2010

    Phil M said:"If you know so much about Line 6's business and how they should make their money, why not start your own business?"

     

    If a JT variax cost's $1k at musician's friend, deduct markup and the electronics/R&D cannot cost more than $500 or else L6 is taking a loss.  L6 wouldn't be selling their electronics at a loss in order to market a bunch of mediocre guitars.  The precision of the economic argument matters not, the point is that they could sell way more guitar modeler pedals than they will EVER sell JTVariaxes-- even if the implementation of a random piezo guitar plugged into a variax modeler yields a sound with more latency or slightly lower tonal quality than hardwiring the unit inside a guitar with a tested and refined piezo design. 


    I don't have to know much about L6 to know that prioprietary instruments are a bad decision from an economic standpoint.  This will be clear when zoom, fractal, eleven rack, Korg, Yamaha, Digidesign, Native instruments or some other company decides it's going to jump into the pedal market with an array high quality guitar simulators. Gibson just tried their own "supervariax"  (guitar models + effects) which is really a piece of crap design but it does indicate that the instrument modeling competition is going to start soon

     

    "I  guess I tend to think that people who are actually manufacturing a  product tend to know a bit more than the people simply sitting around  talking about making a product."

    I'm not talking about making a product, but I'm gonna take an educated guess that you're wrong about a lot of things you 'tend to think'

     

     

    There  are tons of sub-par acoustic emulator pedals.  They might sound near  OK, but none of them anywhere near as good as the acoustic emulations on  a Variax.

    And they aren't designed to be used with an in-line XLR output either.

     

    I also don't think the new JVT Variaxes can be described as  "suboptimal" in any way.  Granted they are only available in the three  styles at the moment, but they are the real deal.  They aren't just some  cheap, entry level instrument."""

     

    I didn't say they were garbage, I said they weren't good.  While there are plenty of good guitars that don't cost $3k, I'm simply not interested in buying a factory assembled strat/LP copy.  Cannibalizing a $1000 guitar so I can put the electronics in a single custom guitar just isn't as appealing as paying $500 for a rack or pedal unit that would allow me to install piezo saddles in any of my (11) guitars and plug into a Variax emulation.  If the number of replies to this thread is any indication, I'm not alone.  I will never buy a JT Variax to play as my personal guitar but I would buy an emulator rack or pedal unit.

  • JellyWheat Gear Head 1,220 posts since
    Aug 18, 2008

    For what it's worth, I think your arguments are bang-on target, and very well put. I agree with every point you have made wholeheartedly. [And besides, I never take comments prefaced by: "Oh yeah, well if you know so much..." seriously. Anything that follows that kind of preamble is usually puerile.]

     

    Thank you for so clearly expressing what many others also feel about this matter.

     

    My $0.02/FWIW/YMMV

    JellyWheat

  • amx05462 Power User 3,495 posts since
    Sep 1, 2008

    well phil    opinions  are .... well a  smart  person  like yourself  knows  . everyone  has  there  own  opinion..   and  ive  always  said  they  make  a decent  product .   any  BUSINESS  person  knows  theres  always room for improvement   and  any BUSINESS   man   will tell you  there  only going to go    far enough  and  no further. wht  phil. because    its  about  profits.     BUSINESS   men phil also  take  into   there  plans   how much   of   a product  they  can put   on the  market  that will sell within a  price  range    that the  general public   will be able to afford

     

      this  is an example  of  what  i mean

     

     

      a diamond  encrusted  soper  variax  with  a solid  gold  neck.  1,000 ,000 . how many are  you gonna sell phil........

     

    so  they will improve     to a point  where.  they casn sell the latest  one  make  some  money  as you say  and   wait till    the   excitement  dies  out    and  make  the  next   planned  improvement   so    they  can go another  round  of  sales.

     

    take  microsoft  phil  as an  example  every  couple  of years   the newest  version of  windows  comes  out.

     

       how much more  do you get  for your  money.    while  your  ruching  to the  store   there    working on the nexxt  version  htere  gonna sell to you.

     

      thats    a  hort  and simple version version  of   how  business  works  phil

     

      as to why i personlly  arent  in business  phil

     

       finances    phil

     

    tellya  what  though

     

      let  me  know  when  you  want  to back a  project  or  two  and  well go  partners    .  i got  some ideas  and    amnufacturing  experience.   i need  some  backing.      what do you say..........

  • amx05462 Power User 3,495 posts since
    Sep 1, 2008

    jason i agree .   heres  what  it  is      the company  has  decided   what  profit  per  unit  they want to  make.

     

    they  manufacture   acordingly.   renkin  quoted  500  bucks  street  value  in  his   threda on the  new  variax      the 500 was howevr   the price  of the old  electronics.

     

      also the  quote  ws 200  for the   rest of the guitar

     

      point being  the  guitar  was  equivalent to  a  squire    strat   or  equivalent  guitar.

     

    now  you know  street  value  is  not  what they  paid  for the  electronics.      anyone  who  knows   about thaat can tell you      that those  boards  are  made    relatively     cheaply    in   asia.

     

    and so  are the  majority  of  jtvs  being  made   . so   thats  where  they   make there  profit.

     

    and  thats  why  an  american made  jtv  will cost you   a  leg and  an arm.

     

      well gotto  go do some  manufacturing  now  

     

      tty   later

  • amx05462 Power User 3,495 posts since
    Sep 1, 2008

    when they   start  with   oh yeah....

     

     

      well you know the  rest 

  • phil_m Expert Line 6 User 4,243 posts since
    Jan 25, 2007

    Puerile?  OK...

     

    I was actually being serious.  I'm not trying to just denigrate his idea.  I happen to agree that if there were something that could match the modeling capabilities of the Variax in pedal form it probably would sell very well, and it would probably actually make the Variax itself obsolete.  I just don't see anything in the market coming close to that capability, though. Even solutions that use MIDI pickups suffer from tracking problems, and they still require some modification of the guitar itself.  So I think if there are people who insist on using their top-of-the-line guitars in a modeling situation, it means they have to do some sort of after-market modification still.

     

    So while I see why it might read like I was blowing the comment off, that wasn't my intention.  There seems to be an obvious hole in the market right now, and no one has really been able to fill it.  I find to be the Variax solution to be pretty good.  The JVT are well-made guitars, and they do what they do well.  However, it seems there are people who will be resistant to buying another guitar (although I would suggest they at least give the JVT an actual try before passing on it - everyone I've talked to who's actually played one seemed to really liked at least one of the three models currently available).

     

    Line 6 does actually listen to customer complaints and suggestions pretty wellas far as I can tell.  If there's something that people want that isn't out there yet, I'd say it usually comes down to a matter of being technically infeasible or simply not viable from a cost perspective yet.  I just have to believe that Line 6 wants to succeed and sell product more than any of their biggest fans on the boards do.

  • JellyWheat Gear Head 1,220 posts since
    Aug 18, 2008

    Well, phil, I honestly did take your first two paragraphs in the post to which I responded as being rather presumptuous, but that's water over the dam.

     

    I don't think that anyone (myself included), who would like to be able to buy a RackVax type of rig directly from Line 6, wants to start up a business to fill this void. Line 6 offers their POD products in several different physical configurations, ranging from the beloved bean, to floor units, to sophisticated rack units. I presume they can realize a profit from all of them, and that the products compliment, and not cannibalize, one another.

     

    What causes you to assume that offering the same choice of configurations to Variax afficioados will inescapably extinguish Variax guitar sales? I think this is a weak link in your argument. A second weak link is that Variaxes are well-made guitars. I have owned 3 of them, and NONE of them was anything to write home about. The variax 700 made by Fuji-gen-Gakki that I owned for a number of years was by far the best-made, but - for the $1,750 I paid - it didn't deliver the playability I expect from an electric guitar in the $1,000-$1,200 price range (discounting the cost of the electronics). Others who now own JTV Variaxes have posted comments that echo these sentiments in great enough numbers to lend credibility to the observation.

     

    I no longer own any Variaxes, since the advantages of the modeling technology TO ME are not worth the trade-off of having to play a second- or third-rate instrument in order to access it. I would, however, be prepared to either fit a hexophonic bridge to one of my Les Pauls, or to buy a Roland-ready Stratocaster that I could plug into a Variax rack unit. The way, if the Variax rack unit is superseded by newer technology, I don't have to contemplate ditching one of my cherished instruments, to which I have become accustomed, in order to keep current.

     

    I would imagine that others who don't have as extensive high-end guitar stable as I am privileged to own might want to but a JTV Variax and be done with it, so a Line 6 guitar would, indeed, serve the hobbyist or "weekend warrior" market niche (which is large enough to merit its own product offering). Why Line 6 is so resistant to even discussing a varaint of their current marketing vector is beyond me. I can only surmise that they don't want companies like Behringer to knock off pirated copies of their Variax box, and feel that encapsulating the technology in a crappy, proprietary guitar will afford at least some protection, however transitory, from this threat.

     

    It's all conjecture on my part, of course. What remains is that I can think of no good reason why any innovative, market-oriented company would refuse to dialogue with its prospective customers except, of course, unless the principal shareholder was Steve Jobs. Line 6 cannot aspire to the type of autocratic marketing success that has accrued to Apple, however, because in my opinion, their vision of the end-user's experience is incomplete and therefore flawed.

     

    [Here endeth the lesson, let us sing Hymn #342...]

     

    JellyWheat

  • rackvax Just Startin' 46 posts since
    Jul 27, 2009

    jason367 wrote:

     

    The rack vax is $1200, doesn't come with a piezo pickup, doesn't use XLR inputs and doesn't do midi switching.  For my purposes, it would be cheaper to cannibalize a cheap JTV.

    If zoom can make a profit off 12 models for $80 at amazon, I think Line 6 can make a profit off of $500 for 25 models with full firmware functionality.  Nice to know that the rack vax is available though.  Thanks for the link.

     

    RackVax is MIDI controllable / switchable and integrates into MIDI rigs perfectly. If you mean it doesn't have a 1/4" T/S switch output for amp channel switching, you're right, but that kind of feature doesn't belong in this type of device anyway. RackVax is a rackmount guitar modeling device which is designed to sit between your guitar and amp as if it wasn't even there so that you can get the sounds of the Variax from any guitar equipped with a GK pickup. Your effects processor is the more appropriate amp switcher.

     

    The point about an analog XLR input is moot as one of the requirements of the advanced guitar modeling DSP and the digital retuning functionality as found in the Variax is a polyphonic / hex pickup with a separate analog audio channel for each string. An analog XLR input is not really appropriate for these types of devices as analog XLR implies a monophonic signal.

     

    However, it is arguably more desireable to have an XLR output, and this is easy to obtain with RackVax by using the Line 6 XPS foot switch.

  • rackvax Just Startin' 46 posts since
    Jul 27, 2009

    phil_m wrote:

     

    Puerile?  OK...

     

    I was actually being serious.  I'm not trying to just denigrate his idea.  I happen to agree that if there were something that could match the modeling capabilities of the Variax in pedal form it probably would sell very well, and it would probably actually make the Variax itself obsolete.  I just don't see anything in the market coming close to that capability, though. Even solutions that use MIDI pickups suffer from tracking problems, and they still require some modification of the guitar itself.  So I think if there are people who insist on using their top-of-the-line guitars in a modeling situation, it means they have to do some sort of after-market modification still.

     

     

    While it's not in pedal format, RackVax is the closest thing to a Variax pedal available. It does not suffer from "tracking problems" and plays just like a Variax. No modification to your guitar is required. A Roland GK-3 external pickup can be attached without any modification whatsoever.

  • jason367 Just Startin' 10 posts since
    Aug 24, 2010

    rackvax wrote:


     

    RackVax is MIDI controllable / switchable and integrates into MIDI rigs perfectly.


    So if I want to integrate with a G system, I can program patch 30 of the TC electronic G-system to use 50% telecaster sound coming from the piezo/modeling and 50% electric pickups of my guitar then footswitch to patch 31 for a guild 12 string model with completely different effects and amp routing with no electric pickup mix?  That's the type of midi control/integration I'm looking for.

     

    ...

     

    The point about an analog XLR input is moot as one of the requirements of the advanced guitar modeling DSP and the digital retuning functionality as found in the Variax is a polyphonic / hex pickup with a separate analog audio channel for each string. An analog XLR input is not really appropriate for these types of devices as analog XLR implies a monophonic signal.

         I didn't know Variax required hexaphonic.  The zoom modeling works relatively well with a generic piezo but doesn't have the variety/quality of models.  I like the Ghost system I have in one of my strats.  The XLR request was just an upgrade for a higher quality signal.  I figured it would improve the modeling to have a purer output than running a unbalanced1/4 plug to the modeler as most people do with acoustic electrics.

     

    However, it is arguably more desireable to have an XLR output, and this is easy to obtain with RackVax by using the Line 6 XPS foot switch.

    I would want XLR out to the PA + 1/4 out to amplifier that was switchable depending on the chosen patch.  Thanks for the reply, I learned more about the Rackvax than was evident from your webpage.  It seems like a good product but it's still quite expensive.  If I had a guitar with a GK pickup, I would consider it.

     

     

  • rackvax Just Startin' 46 posts since
    Jul 27, 2009

    jason367 wrote:

     

    rackvax wrote:


     

    RackVax is MIDI controllable / switchable and integrates into MIDI rigs perfectly.


    So if I want to integrate with a G system, I can program patch 30 of the TC electronic G-system to use 50% telecaster sound coming from the piezo/modeling and 50% electric pickups of my guitar then footswitch to patch 31 for a guild 12 string model with completely different effects and amp routing with no electric pickup mix?  That's the type of midi control/integration I'm looking for.


     

     

     

    With RackVax, you can switch between the Variax modeled sounds and your magnetic pickups using MIDI program change or CCs. Our switching circuit maintains the purity of your tone in both cases.


    We decided against a blend circuit just as Line 6 did with the James Tyler Variax and opted for a true bypass because the purity of the tone was more of an importance than being able to mix the sounds.

  • buddy85216 Just Startin' 1 posts since
    Mar 28, 2011

    Thanks guys. Great thread. And now I know about RackVax. I had just spent the whole weekend looking at the Warmoth site pondering. I'm seeing it 180 degrees different than I did. Modeling FX belong on the floor or in a rack - not in the amp or guitar.

  • Colin2113 Just Startin' 51 posts since
    Oct 29, 2009

         amen to that I LOVE my black on black Variax 300. It sounds absolutly incredible paired with my PODHD500. I just got it used a week ago for 275.00.

         Anyone thinking about buying an orginal used variax now is the time. There are not many left in the 2-300 price range. I searched ebay for days finally found the used one I wanted at a guitar center in New Jersey ( I live in Florida )

     

    there is a guy in pennsylvania that does the variax transplants for a living.

     

    Warmoth.com has an entire section of their site dedicated to building a custom guitar with your own Variax guts.

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Previous Next

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (1)

Legend

  • Correct Answers - 5 points
  • Helpful Answers - 3 points