Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

bob808

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bob808

  1. bob808

    Helix 3.11 Issue

    hi GabCS, glad to hear your problem solved. If you still remember, when the tech support work on your helix, what board and where that board located? I am running the same ui mcu stuck kind of thing right now, and in my town there is no qualified tech support so I must to figure it on my own
  2. my LT also have occur this problem, I have open a support ticket but there is no reply till now
  3. Hi Grayson, would you mind to post again what cable that disconnected inside the unit? I would like to know too, because my LT occur the ui mcu firmware error thing
  4. In other words,will be better if the bass signal aren’t split, merge them after the processing and give a fx send block before the 1/4” output so one of 1/4” send can be connected to on-stage bass amp return. We have to carefully tweak & mix the parallel bass so the compressed low and dirt amp bass sound balance before merged and send to foh. By the way, thank you very much Kilrahi for share your thought, i really appreciate that. At the end, looks like LT can possibly suit to our stringed instruments processing.
  5. I am still not sure on the bass parallel path. If in guitar path the fx send block placed after the amp block before the split, how about bass path? For bass, i like to give clean low & dirt channel independently to the FOH and let the sound guy mix it. Does this posible: Input>split crossover: Parallel A (>200hz) >compressor block>b7k block>amp block>ir block>eq block> 1st LT’s 1/4” output Parallel B(<200hz)>filter block for high pass>compressor block>2nd LT’s 1/4” output. Where the fx send block will be placed for the bass player still can monitoring helix sound into the return of on-stage bass amp?
  6. I plan to do this in one LT unit, will this thing be possible?
  7. Thank you for your guidance... Yes, its max out the hx stomp blocks , this will be my other consideration. Actually, i don’t buy hx stomp yet, i am still on gathering informations. My plan that, in our band which contains 1 guitarist & 1 bassist, we plan to do processing on modelling like helix line products. Guitar will need an overdrive, amp block (send dry to on-stage amp’s return for monitoring purpose), 2 ir (for thicknes & lil bit of wide) & eq on each before send those to FOH. Bass’es will also have parallel processing begin with split crossover to low (<200hz) and compress it quite hard and out to 1 dedicated output. The high (>200hz) will need a b7k block, amp block, ir block & eq block also go out to 1 dedicated output. So in total i need 4 output and 2 send (helix dry amp signal into on-stage amp returns). I think of 2 hx stomp or a helix LT, which one can handle this processing. Do you have any suggestion?
  8. After the fx send block, does hx stomp still capable of doing those 2 ir parallel? After each ir block in that parallel chain i plan to add an eq for some little tweak before send to foh.
  9. Thank you for sharing this routing way, for single guitarist in the band have 1 amp model + 2 ir send to the foh is enough, or if capable i still can add eq after ir block on each path before merged. But i still courious to know how if i also want a dry/amp only signal for monitoring, like from hx stomp send going into on-stage amp’s return?
×
×
  • Create New...