Deneteus

So the 2.10 update is coming out in 2016 rather than New Years. There seems to be some conflict with what Line6 deems as steady. Which is why I asked. So Yamaha is acting more like a holdings company. They never sell you but they expect you to turn a profit. I like your iceberg pic but eventually the iceberg melts away and you are left but nothing but seawater.

Thank you god of the Line 6 forums. This is exactly the response people expect.

I like how you say updates have been fairly regular. The Ideascale submissions have looked like a gridlock for the past year. Some of them have been closed and under consideration for a while which is why some people aren't using it. The NAMM update was the largest significant update that came out this year because of the release of the software. You brought up the subject of Quality and far as I can tell no one has complained about quality only what actually got added. What could they add that would cheapen the platform? It's already being cheapened by the lack of updates in general. And I visit the forums quite frequently. You don't have to login to read comments remember. There are alot of people that avoid these forums just because of the way some of the members act. Like they are the only say on any matters Line 6 related. God forgive anyone who would rock the boat with questions they don't care about.

Obviously asking about any of those topics makes the forum herds salty, since ya'll are generally broken down into a few types. Hence the peanut gallery comment. I'd expect the same retarded responses even without the bold and italics. Because a few of the regulars do not care to ask questions about stuff like that. It makes ya'll just as bad as the spooks at the AxeFX forums. I have actually seen more info flowing on Facebook than I have here. Telling people to 'sell if you don't like' it is the same as the Republicans asking for everyone to come together after Trump won. It's not going to happen. And from this one post that no one will like comes information that people actually care about. Even if it is outright ignored.

With all due respect, these questions are specifically for Line6/Yamaha. If you are happy with the way it is, then realistically this post is not for you and it is not up for debate. Especially if you do not work for, or at Line6. There are many of us that want to know where this train is headed. Life is short. Any more updates in 2016? Whats the slow down on changes being implemented from Ideascale? Why are there no quarterly updates? Has the Yamaha acquisition slowed you down? Did you lose engineers? Should we expect a Yamahelix successor with functionality that the Helix does not have like Wireless support? What is your current commitment to the Helix? It's about to be 2017. What should we expect? Should we sell our Helix's before a disappointment at a future NAMM 2017? For the peanut gallery. This post is not for you. This post is for the people that purchased the Helix expecting change and all out support for the platform that is considered their Flagship device considering the way it was advertised. There are those of us that expect a decent amount of regular change. This is starting to feel like old Line 6 or even Korg where they released a flagship device, pushed it out the door, made a few updates to the OS and then later abandoned the platform for a new one. Roland did the same thing with their GT/Fantom G series. We don't want the Helix to be a market stopgap to make quick money and dash while the company tries to find itself. I fully recognize it took a while for some of us even to get our hands on the hardware depending on where you are in the world. I am still pissed about the Looper without quantization and the lack of support for the DT Series Amps and the lack of decent midi and timecode implementation and the fact that it took so long just to get a software interface. There are many of us that see this as a wasted opportunity with all of the other hardware and software releases that we have seen from Line 6. Some of us have higher expectations and that should be expected.

You would be surprised how many people do work for free at software companies. Either on purpose or inadvertently.