Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

mbach72

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Registered Products
    2

mbach72's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • First Post Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I'll be watching this thread with interest. I've only had my HD500x for a month, so I'm still getting acquainted with all the little nuances, but this has been problem I've been struggling with too. It's not just a little raspy either, it sounds like I'm playing through a blown speaker. So far, this has made playing the HD through headphones totally unusable for me. To me it sounds like real bad digital clipping, but I've tried everything to make sure I'm not overloading it anywhere. I see that the consensus about the HD's headphone amp is that it is less than ideal, and it also suggests really high impedance headphones(which I admittedly don't have.) I don't know if the lower than suggested impedance of my headphones is a culprit but I don't think that's completely it. Just like you, if I play a track into my daw and then apply a third party IR, it makes a world of difference. That leads me to believe that the cab simulations have something to do with it.
  2. Hey everybody, I know these topics have been beaten to death but I have a question I can't quite find an answer too, and yes I've read just about every thread on the HD500/HD500x I can find on the web. I just got my HD500x a few weeks ago and I've been slowly learning my way through the numerous parameters and trying to put together some decent tones. I started off playing through effects return of my Randall Rm100.Unfortunately, I'm currently playing that amp through a cab with terrible speakers, so no matter what I put though it, it sounds terrible. That's a shame too, because that's a screaming amp, but that another story. I've seen lots of people recommending the Tech21 Power Engine 60. While looking around for one of those something hit me. I have an old Spider 3-75 watt sitting around that I've used for playing around the house. That amp has the same Celestion Seventy/80 that the Power Engine uses. I can run the Spider in test mode which basically just bypasses everything before the power amp. So essentially, it's a 75 watt power amp going into a Seventy/80. I've been running Combo-Power Amp mode into that and getting what I think are decent tones, at least to my undiscriminating ear. I've been using the "Pre" amp models and the live voiced cabs as the Seventy/80 is a pretty boring, neutral sounding speaker(which is, I'm guessing, why they use it on modeling amps) and the subtle changes of the cab models help me dial in the sounds I'm looking for. So the question is; Is there something about the Power Engine that would be drastically different from this setup, or is it basically the same thing? The only real difference I can see is that I can't control the volume of the Spider in test mode and have to use the POD's master volume. I realize that the POD get a better SNR with the master up higher, but this setup is just for the house so I can deal with that. Finally, what would the advantages/disadvantages of a powered PA speaker be compared to this setup? Thanks in advance for and help!
×
×
  • Create New...