Dommedagsprofet Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Procedure: - Edit one or more presets in HD500x Edit. - Press "SET LIST" or "ALL" under the "SEND" header. Result: => Sending (uploading) to the HD500x takes the same amount of time regardless of the number of presets changed. Workaround: - Mark only the changed presets. - Press "SELECTED" instead of "SET LIST" under the "SEND" header. Suggested feature: - Sending (uploading) "SET LIST" or "ALL" should only upload the changed presets. - HD500x Edit already knows which presets are changed. Those are marked with yellow, italic and an asterisk. - Preferably, this should also go for downloading from the Pod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jandrio Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 ...- HD500x Edit already knows which presets are changed. Those are marked with yellow, italic and an asterisk... true if synchronization is perfect. false if POD+PUTER r out-of-synch... this is a common situtaion 'n cld happen if u: 1. initialize hd edit off-line (ie pod not connected), 2. tweak presets, 3. connect pod, 4. answer no in the prompt "a pod is connected. Do u want 2 load presets? Answering yes will overwrite all unsaved info"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dommedagsprofet Posted September 18, 2014 Author Share Posted September 18, 2014 I see the challenge. Maybe it's possible to have timestamps to check sync before up- and downloading, and then transfer only the changed presets. That is, if it's possible to create a fast timestamp check. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jandrio Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 "IT-wise" everything is possible. but u always have 2 consider the cost-benefit analysis... in this case the benefit wld be some (milli)seconds faster synch-time... ps timestamps wld not solve the "unsynchronized case" (how do u verify clock-synch btween 2 diff devices?) one way wld b 2 use seperate buffers in order to check if the stored preset is exactly the same with the hd edit preset. in this case a check-digit algorithm might be helpful. but again the benefit shld b minimal, even negative (cause u wld probably need more time comparing than exchanging the whole setlist/bundle), so is it worth implementing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.