RobBaartwijk

Hi all, Simple question; can anyone help me save a lot of time searching? I am looking for a delay in the Pod Go with the longest feedback, preferably up to 4 seconds. I want to try out some Frippertronics and I need the longest delay possible. I know Robert Fripp used two tape delays/echos in serial so that would be my next step; using two 2 seconds delays. I would basically be emulating something like the Strymon Timeline. Any help is appreciated!

The response starts out with 'that's subjective innit? that is YOUR opinion innit?" etcetera. I do not post something like that without having feedback from die hard users on other forums as well as over 40 years of recording experience. You are therefore assuming quite a lot. I quote : "I've never had cause to report any post on this community before but I consider your post has crossed that line, & is inappropriate." If you cannot take the word arse then I seriously do not understand how you can survive in the modern world sir. And if you wish to go to the headmaster with your complaint that says more about you than about me. And BTW : I am NOT a contributor, I am someone with a reasonable suggestion phrased under the very reasonable and polite subject line : "Some room for improvement?". So long and thanks for all the fish. P.S. My apologies to the webmaster for the unnecessary fuss that has been generated.

That is a 'no-reply reply' If I ever saw one. I do not like negative arses. /out

Another improvement for the editor that EveryOne would like : Make it possible to select all IRs that are used/not used in patches. That way it is SO much easier to clean up the unused IRs. Now, as I understand it, I have to make a list somewhere of all the irs used by going through the patches one by one to find out which ones are being used, and that is a lot of manual labour. What would also work is to put a marker next to the Irs in the editor list that are used in at least one patch. Problem solved!

Thanks for the input so far people. More later.

Hi all, I bought a Line 6 Pod Go about a month ago and coming from the ancient Boss GT-8 it is brilliant. There are three things that I think can be improved though so here they are. 1. The quality of the presets is terrible. I have been programming user patches and they sound absolutely great. When I now compare them to the standard presets I get the feeling that I am some kind of Super Programmer... 2. Line 6 gives the impression that there are 128 presets and 128 user patches. This may be technically correct, but a preset cannot be altered. This goes for every preset I have ever come across, and I have owned dozens of synths over the years. What you supply are default patches, not preset patches. What is such a shame about this is that the manual only mentions the fact that the presets can also be updated/altered/improved, just like the user patches, in one line in the manual. I would think that having 256 patches available would make the Pod Go even more desirable, so why not mention this more clearly in the docs? 3. Small thingy but very useful; If you address issue #3; there should be a way to change the words 'Factory' and 'User' into something else. For instance; I would like to be able to have banks under 'Live' and 'Studio' instead of 'Factory' and 'User'. That would be extremely useful because I can then clearly separate my patches that use the amp/cabs for studio use and the other ones for playing live. I can even make duplicates for both situations and store them at the same place in the two banks. 4. You really really REALLY should include a couple of IRs. The moment I started playing with IR's my Pod-life got immeasurably better. I know that there is a whole market out there for IRs and I am not saying that you should supply hundreds of them, but I think that if you include say a dozen of them, people will immediately hear the difference and start using more and more of them. Having said all this ; as a synth-/guitar-player, as well as a software developer who knows about the power of the processor, I was and am very impressed with what you have been able to achieve. And I am now going back again to programming the sh*t out of this machine! ;) What do you all think? Cheers, Rob.