-
Posts
43 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by patgiff
-
Hi I just got my HD500X yesterday. I got a free full Model Pack which I just installed. Unfortunately I cannot tell which amp model is "referring" to which real amp. Then I realized this is true in general, not just for the Model Packs. For example, how do I know which one is a Roland JC-120... I guess that is called "Jazz Rivet"??? There must be a list that shows all the mapping between model and real, and I hope somebody here can tell me where it is. Thanks!
-
I may need to come back and ask you exactly how to do that. I just decided NOT to buy a slightly used DT25 for a really good price, because it does not help me with my desire for a complete solution for acoustic and electric with the Variax/Pod combination. So getting a good acoustic sound with the Variax and the Pod is a priority for me. I already have a good electric sound from my H&K tube amp, which, if I move to Pod/L2T, I will not be using any more. The upside has got to be in getting an acoustic sound on stage with me.
-
Need help choosing amp or PA
patgiff replied to khoff2's topic in Dream Rig - Line 6 Product Integration
This thread helped me a lot. I just got a new HD500X yesterday. Got a JTV69 last week. My goal is to have electric, acoustic, and virtual capo all in one guitar in an integrated system. (I have been carrying a 2nd guitar with me just for one song, this is nuts.) Now I have the chance to buy a like-new DT25 for about $550 (I live in Germany) to go with my brand new 500X. For a purely electric rig this would be excellent. But after doing a lot of reading I came to the conclusion that my acoustic needs would still not be met. So I will have to go for FRFR, maybe the L2T. This thread confirmed that I have to let that DT25 go...sadly. I already have a very nice tube amp so no worries :-) But I agree, there is no point in having a Pod running into the mixer and having my tube amp with me on stage (unless a DT)- the sounds would be very different. Therefore the "Stage amp" will need to be FRFR. -
I got your point, but my point was that even somebody who reviews guitar rigs for a living did not understand that a modeler should run into a FRFR for best results. I personally concluded a while ago that it didn't make a lot of sense to run a modeler whether a Pod or a RP1000 etc into the input of a guitar amp. And if you run it into the power amp only, why bother to have a guitar amp with a preamp section. Yes the logical conclusion is to get a FRFR. Looks like I may also be headed in the L2T direction as soon as I sell a few more of my guitars :-) Then I will see the look on the face of my lead guitar player who has been playing a 1979 Strat... since 1981.
-
Thanks for the clarification, I was also wondering what is the difference between the two since they look identical and are almost the same price. For a little extra money I will buy the L2T because I just sold my Fishman acoustic guitar amp- since I sold all my acoustic guitars... bought a JTV, just ordered a HD500X... and hoping to "get it all" from a JTV/HD500X/L2T. "Hope springs eternal." But if I ever need a standalone "acoustic guitar amp" I can use the L2T. Very important: The advice about switching to PA/Reference mode when using a modeler. I just (an hour ago) read a review of the L2T (in German, I live here) where the guy tested the L2T using a Kemper Profiler, but he switched the L2T to "Electric Guitar" mode... and then he said the L2T is great, but not really suitable as a replacement for a guitar amp with 12" cab. And that was from a guy who reviews gear for a living.
-
I hear you. My back does too. A modelling preamp pretty much demands an FRFR, anything else does not really make logical sense. I just still wonder if the POD/FRFR combination is a convincing replacement for a tube amp. I am not religious about this. I had Spider Valve MKII's, then I had Digitech RP1000 running into an Engl Screamer, and I tried the RP1000 straight into the PA as well. I used a Tech21 FlyRig 5 into the PA. But today I have a Hughes & Kettner Grandmeister 36 head that I can carry with one hand. It has 128 presets and 4 built in channels. A basic set of effects. Nothing as grand as a Pod or Helix. But it sounds like a tube amp cause it is. But still, ff there was a Firehawk 750 weighing half as much, I would give it a try with a Pod HD!
-
Thanks, I will try going through pure DI pedal into the mixer and see how that works out. I think the ParaDriver may add cab emulation so I will turn it off. So you raise another question in my mind, as you say the DT 25 is not an acoustic amp and you should have FRFR or a mixer/PA ... so if you are playing a Variax through a Pod HD, and you are using a DT25 for your electric guitar sound, how do you bypass the DT25 and get to the mixer for the acoustic sounds? I had been seriously looking at that Firehawk 1500 but that thing is just too big and heavy for me.
-
I just got a JTV69 and probably for the same reasons as man others - so I can go to a gig with only 1 guitar. No more capo, no more 2nd guitar, no more separate rig for acoustic guitar... sounds like Nirvana (not the band :-)). Anyway I was checking out the acoustic sounds today and I was not really impressed. I was playing through a pretty high quality "Tech21 Paradriver DI" preamp into my powermixer (as I would with a real acoustic) but the sounds were not realistic. Sometimes sounded more like listening to a synthesizer than a guitar. Any advice? Please don't say I need to get a Pod HD and DT25 just for good acoustic sounds, I have a wonderful tube amp that I love already for my electric sounds. I have been compromising on the songs where I wanted to play acoustic, by playing very clean electric with some chorus etc. but I was hoping to get a realistic acoustic sound out of the JTV... one big reason for buying it. Next gig in 11 days! Thanks Pat
-
Variax And Wireless
patgiff replied to BluesPlayer76's topic in James Tyler Variax Guitars / Workbench HD
Agreed. But perhaps as a high-end option on the Helix. Look what people are willing to pay for a Kemper Profiling rig including the foot controller, it's around $2100. And that is not wireless either. -
Variax And Wireless
patgiff replied to BluesPlayer76's topic in James Tyler Variax Guitars / Workbench HD
Maybe they should build wireless capability into the Helix? That is where a higher price point does not seem to be a problem. -
Hi Napynap, thanks for the info, this is exactly what I needed to know! Keep on rockin'!
-
I guess I was very lucky indeed. A friend told me about the SV line (now that I think of it, another friend warned me that it was no good, but HE then spent a few grand on a 1-channel, hand-wired Suhr amp) and so I bought 2 of them within the last 6 months or so- first a HD100 brand new. Then, from the same dealer (I live in Germany) a 112 that was "B Stock" for an amazing price of 322 Euros, when if you can find them at all now they sell for over 500 Euros for a 112. I am just getting into all this amp can do, in fact I am in this forum because I want to try out the "Direct Out" feature to reduce the jet blast in our tiny rehearsal room with full drum set, bass, keyboard, lead guitarist with a Diezel 100W and 412 stack, and me with the HD100 and 412 stack. I already took the HD out and brought the 112 in, but it is still so loud. I figured it is worth a try to use the Direct Out feature and go directly into the mixer (a Behringer X.32) and then listen with a monitor or with the powered L&R boxes from the mixer. Anybody have experience with the Direct Out? Can somebody explain when to use it in "Studio" and when to use it in "Performance" mode, and why?