Jump to content

robertgoddard

Members
  • Content Count

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

23 Neutral

About robertgoddard

  • Rank
    Just Startin'

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
     Southeast Virginia
  • Registered Products
    2

Recent Profile Visitors

452 profile views
  1. That's exactly what re-amping is. Prior to the days of digital, if you re-amped, you would play back the DI track back into the amp and record it again.
  2. This is basically like parity of data? Thanks for your contribution to this endeavor.
  3. @silverhead Reading this: He is offering a script that takes a recorded microphone sample of your guitar, along with a recorded sample of your piezo pickup, and creates an IR of the difference. This IR can be placed in your Helix, which would offer the same function as the ToneDexter or Aura, which are $399 and $379 pieces of hardware. You can get this functionality for free with this software and script! What I am also reading is jonfields45 is offering to do this for you for free, but you still need to send him a microphone recorded sample of your guitar, along with the same sample recorded from the under saddle piezo pickup, again in your guitar. He would then send you the IR to load into your Helix to use with your guitar live. This isn't an IR to make an electric sound like an acoustic or for cabs with amps.
  4. @jonfields45 So what I get from this, is you're making an IR based on the difference between the input signal from a UST and the microphone recorded sound, to create the interpolation of what it would sound like in person? Apply the IR to the UST and you get the microphone recorded sound? This would be awesome!
  5. https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=568631
  6. Just released at NAMM
  7. Looks a lot like something I proposed a few months ago, Digital Igloo even said there may not be a market for it. My concept from a few months back:
  8. I wonder how many of these comparisons are being done "live"? Let me explain: Helix Native is a VST based plug-in for a DAW running on a PC/Mac. These are using general compute x86 based CPUs. These CPUs are not designed for DSP processing natively. While running the plug-in live, I predict that helix Native is giving an approximation of what it should sound like after it's rendered. Helix Floor/LT/Stomp/etc... are all running a custom Helix Core OS on an embedded (most likely ARM based) CPU and separate DSP Processors that work in real time. I wonder if you record a track from a Helix hardware unit with both the processed track and the dry track from the Helix, and run Helix Native on the dry track (reamping) and RENDER the file, if you could tell a difference?
  9. I mean, this just screams of "You should be tolerant of others. Now that I know you're intolerant of other people's feelings, I'm going to be intolerant towards you!" Where have I seen this kind of behavior before?
  10. Wow, sarcasm isn't part of your repertoire? It's obviously a joke, a poorly done photo edit that is clearly not intended to mislead. If it makes you feel better, I'll say sorry but not mean it. "Sorry" Edit: Just to be clear, I'm not a malicious troll, I'm just having fun with this as it helps pass the wait for the update. I'm a serious user and can't wait to try out the Revv model coming with the update.
  11. Guys, this is it, PHOTO EVIDENCE. The internet never lies!
  12. 2.8 is going to drop today. if not, then next week, because L6 doesn't release on Fridays.
  13. Negative, VirtualGuitars was correct
  14. I was just throwing ideas out there, I'm already a happy owner of an LT with the backpack deal that happened back in March. I love it! Good to see feedback from higher ups in any company. Keep up the good fight D.I. I appreciate your time!
×
×
  • Create New...