Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

Regarding CUSTOMTONE, I'd like to see...


Rocco_Crocco
 Share

Recommended Posts

forum members being allowed to comment or make tips/suggestions on Customtone uploads.

 

It would help newbies learn the ins and outs of tone seeking and would improve the user experience, IMHO.

 

Do you mean other member's tones? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is good in theory. But, I think the application of it would be a bigger nuisance than benefit. 

 

 

A better way than a public comment, would be for private messages to be sent. But even that would cause problems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is good in theory. But, I think the application of it would be a bigger nuisance than benefit. 

 

 

A better way than a public comment, would be for private messages to be sent. But even that would cause problems. 

Do you mean it would cause trolling? I could see that but the trolls are always out from under the bridge in threads, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I guess I am envisioning each CustomeTone page to be like a thread, where people could comment on the original patch, and even tweak it and upload the changes into the thread.

 

Although it could get massive, a good database query interface would make it more manageable and user friendly. It could include specific,searchable categories for particular guitars, pickups, amps, L6 usernames, artists, bands, output modes, etc. Good idea Rocco!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean it would cause trolling? I could see that but the trolls are always out from under the bridge in threads, anyway.

 

Yes, but not just that. 

How many times do you see people say "I am afraid to post because of what you people may say" -- so, using that same way of thinking, could you imagine the tones that won't be posted because someone is afraid of possibly hearing criticism. 

 

PLUS, since you specifically said 'for newbs to hear suggestions" --- that is a bad idea. 

You see it all the time in posts. Using different speakers causes it to sound different. Using different pickups, strings, picks, playing technique -- it all results in different tone. So, for you to ask me "How does my Slash patch sound", it will never sound the same as it does at your place because I fingerpick a Rickenbacker.  

 

 

Don't get me wrong. I often wonder what people think of tones, and think a comment section would help.

But I think any time you let people speak, things become totally different.

 

 

 

 

Although it could get massive, a good database query interface would make it more manageable and user friendly. It could include specific,searchable categories for particular guitars, pickups, amps, L6 usernames, artists, bands, output modes, etc. Good idea Rocco!

 

CT already allows you to fill in information like that about your own tone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CT already allows you to fill in information like that about your own tone. 

 

The idea was not so much about posting, but searching. 

 

If someone wanted to search for a patch that included all of the following with one query.

 

Studio/Direct output mode

EMG 81 pickups

Brit J-800

DT25

 

Just one example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That search would be nice, however filling all fields when posting the tone would be required, otherwise only 5% of the tones would have the info.  Pull downs ideal to keep the kiddies from putting in non-guitar words.

 

Pull down boxes is what I was thinking, like in Access or Excel. I have not had a chance to use it yet, but my understanding is the HD500Lister program creates a text file of the "ingredients" of a patch. Since you can't comment on your patch until after you upload it, some of the fields could be auto populated for the user, like the amp and any other patch based info. So if you wanted examples of patches that used U-Vibe or Obi-Wah, you could easily find them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but what you fill in can already be searched. So, even though there isn't a specific pickup slot, you can put EMG 81 in any spot. 

 

I tried doing a search in CT with different operands and operators without success. Maybe I was using the wrong syntax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That assumes someone put in the terms you're looking for. 

 

 

I used FRFR and got results.

I used DT25 and got results.

 

FRFR DT25, no results.

FRFR + DT25, no results.

FRFR AND DT25, no results.

"FRFR" "DT25", no results.

"FRFR" AND "DT25", no results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if FRFR is a term widely used outside of forums and advertising. I can't say that I recall anyone ever using it in conversation -- hey man, your frfr sounds really hot. 

 

 

BUT, if you put EMG into CTsearch I found 559 results. 

Seymour Duncan gives 266. 

 

 

Like I said, your idea of being able to add more information - particularly from a drop down box to make sure spellings and model names are proper. 

Until that day occurs, you can still search what people manually input. 

 

It's the other guy, the one that wants to let users critique tones, that is what I don't think is a good idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this would be an excellent learning tool.. benefits far outweighing the disadvantages. 

 

 

I newbie could post a patch, asking for feedback. Another member could download it, listen, tweak and resubmit it. Saying something like "it sounded good, but with my set-up, I added a parametric eq and boosted the lows a bit and it sounds better".

 

Of course people have different PU's, monitors, amps, etc. People usually already know to take that into account.

 

My experience, however, is that a good patch through humbuckers and an FRFR rig will still sound pretty good on another guitar with humbuckers and a different FRFR rig. It may need a little tweaking but not much.

 

Regardless, the way Customtone is set up now leaves NO mechanism for feedback other than the star rating, which is pretty nonspecific.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 'settings' section of the forum. 

Do you think that discussing settings and putting up 10 different versions of the same file would be better posted there instead of CT? 

 

On CT, I would be more willing to have a 'comment' section so that we see which ones are good, more than I would want it to teach new people how to do files. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...