arislaf Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 https://soundcloud.com/aris-laf/ballad-of-hades What version of f.w. is it??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junis Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 is is very hard to say Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverhead Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 I think there are at least two guitar tracks. What JTV guitar model(s) are being used? What other processing is being done in the recording? It would be very difficult to identify any difference related to the firmware version if significant other processing is being applied (compression, reverb, chorus, delay, etc....). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ur2funky Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 To me it's easier to tell which is which by playing...I have 1.9 one and 2.0 on another guitar. 1.9 is much more compressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clay-man Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Has a lot of high end and sounds more raw, I'd say with the pre-HD acoustics, like 1.7 or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pugdealer Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 I'd say 1.8 or above...I stuck with 1.71 for a long time and it doesn't sound to me like it...Wouldn't say 2.0 either! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clay-man Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 I'd say 1.8 or above...I stuck with 1.71 for a long time and it doesn't sound to me like it...Wouldn't say 2.0 either! It could have been EQed. The difference between the new acoustics and old acoustics is that the old one still had a very piezo sound but added the body and ralism of an acoustic guitar, while the new acoustics aim more for an even more mic'd up sound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arislaf Posted September 21, 2013 Author Share Posted September 21, 2013 ok, i use only the pod for some fx , specifically the heavy acoustic fx and the acoustic pad (both presets from hd), and no post processing.So yes, there is a bit of compressor out there, but not so much. tomorrow i will reveal the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arislaf Posted September 21, 2013 Author Share Posted September 21, 2013 So, it is a 700 with the 3.1 version! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clay-man Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Nice, so I was kinda right. I thought you meant JTV specifically. :P The modeling is the same I think on a 1.7 JTV and an old Variax. I think the only things that have been changed is some of the behaviors and features, especially the alt tuning, but I think the modeling part is the same. It sounds good. I think both of them are great, but I like how the new acoustics actually try to get a straight up mic'd sound. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverhead Posted September 22, 2013 Share Posted September 22, 2013 Ah - ha.... trickery! Should this not have been posted here? http://line6.com/support/forum/38-variax-guitars-bass-workbench/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arislaf Posted September 22, 2013 Author Share Posted September 22, 2013 He he.... Yes Silverhead ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.