My first several gigs with Helix have been going direct to the board. In that particular band, we use in-ear monitors. The band leader doesn't want to have amplifiers on stage, presumably to control the volume. It made sense to me to tweak my Helix using the same in-ear monitors I use live with the headphone jack. What I hear on the gigs is very similar to what I hear tweaking at home. But...
This past weekend, I played with a band I hadn't worked with before in a club and I used Helix with an FRFR powered speaker (Alto Truesonic TS 212) that I bought recently. In preparation, I did a bit of tweaking at home with the speaker turned up to what I guessed would be close to the volume I'd be using and immediately noticed that the lower and higher frequencies were much more prominent. I wasn't surprised, being aware of the Fletcher-Munson Curve (the theory of how and why we perceive frequencies differently depending on volume). I dialed the bass on my patches back considerably and the treble to a somewhat lesser extent. At the soundcheck, I found I had to dial the bass down even further, which I attribute to the hollow stage we were playing on. I ended up being pretty satisfied with the sound I was getting, though I know it would've been better if I'd had more tweaking time. But now I'm wondering about this:
Those patches that I initially made with my in-ears; what do they sound like at the gigs, given that they're going to be louder in FOH? I've never actually heard what it sounds like coming out of there and maybe I've just been blissfully unaware because they sound fine in my in-ear mix. I played with that band (that uses in-ears) the next night and asked the soundman if my sounds were too boomy and bright and he said "no," but I'm not sure I can just take his word for it. I saved the re-tweaked patches using the powered speaker in different banks; do you guys thing I'd be better off using them instead of the original ones I made using my in-ears?