Jump to content

Euripide

Members
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Neutral

About Euripide

  • Rank
    Just Startin'

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Quebec City
  • Registered Products
    5

Recent Profile Visitors

187 profile views
  1. Open a ticket and the solution was easy, my mistake: If you just click "Done" this will not save the name into the footswitch parameter. You have to press ENTER with each submission.
  2. Reboot PC, still the same problem. Looks like a Windows 7 problem...
  3. Both the Helix Floor and HX Edit updated to 2.82. It could be that my OS is Windows 7. I will reboot my Pc and try again.
  4. HX Edit 2.82 bug with Customizing a Footswitch Label in command center. Cannot name more than one footswitch. I have to go on the Helix Floor directly to name them. Is it a known bug? I haven’t seen anything about this in the forum. thanks in advance.
  5. Euripide

    Helix Snapshots Problems

    Thank you Phil: once I've set the parameter on the Helix itself, I was able to see how to do it in HX Edit. I'm new to Helix (couple of days old) and really love it!
  6. Euripide

    Helix Snapshots Problems

    I want to set a compressor gain at 4.0 on Snapshot 1 and a gain of 6.0 on snapshot 2. It doesn't work at all: all the snapshots recall only the same setting, the last one... The snapshots seem only capable of recalling if a block is off or on. Is it normal? I guess not, it is quite useless if the snapshots cannot recall the different parameters settings inside a block from snapshot to snapshot. What could I've been doing wrong? Helix V2.71
  7. Hi gposada, not sure I understand what you are trying to achieve: from stereo signal to mono signal?
  8. Hi Folinomj, It should work the same. Please note that I’ve started this thread prior to buying the HX effects. Should buy it next May for my anniversary... hopefully the software HX Edit will be fully functionnal with it around that time. So till then, I’m not really speaking from experience. Nerven is the one who answer this thread with pratical knowledge of the HX effects unit,
  9. see the reply of nerven to my post: it is possible & it works through the "Split Y" as the first module and its "BalanceA" & "BalanceB" parameters. And of course by assigning Path A and B outputs independantly at the other end of the chain signal. here is the link: http://line6.com/support/topic/32475-line-6-hx-effects-possible-to-have-2-independent-instrument-lines/
  10. Thanks VirtualGuitars, see the reply of nerven to my post: it is possible & it works through the "Split Y" as the first module and its "BalanceA" & "BalanceB" parameters. And of course by assigning Path A and B outputs independantly at the other end of the chain signal.
  11. Great Thanks nerven! That sound like it! But just to make sure, if ever you have the time & would like to test it, try the little test with a fuzz on one line & a chorus on the other & let see what is coming out from each outputs.
  12. Thanks : Keep me inform if ever Line 6 come back to you & tell you that will be a fix part of a future software update.
  13. Thanks nerven, Maybe you cannot assign the inputs independantly because you have nothing connected in the second input... A dummy connection, like simply connecting a cable or patch cord, should do the trick. I have a Line 6 Flextone III XL and I have to put a dummy connector whenever I want to use only the effects loop, if not there is no sound at all coming out of it. If what I suggest is irrelevant to the HX, logically it should split the signal based on the Left/Right connections. It could be interesting to put let say a fuzz on one of the path & a chorus on the other & see what is happening at the Left output compare to the Right one when you switch your guitar from one input to the other. Cheers, Euripide
  14. Would it be possible to use the HX Effects with two independent GTRs, two amps as in the attached image?
  15. I've just found the problem: I had to put a noise gate at the end of M13 and it changed the signal to mono... It was a POD X3 Live outputs that was feeding its loop return. Changed from X3 outputs to Phones from X3 to feed the M13 & it lower the noise considerably. Anyone as an idea why the outputs of pod X3 are much more noisy then the Phone Out?
×