surfsup1955

10 years with mine (very soon) and admit this update certainly seems like some general shop keeping BUT with the release of a few very data intense (resource hog) amps. I think the shear volume of programming within these new amps tells us that the future of HX needs more oomph, i.e., something else is coming...?

The FM9 factory Marshall presets I played were 100% outstanding - dynamics are wonderful - but not sure they are any better than Helix. My problem with Marshall tone is that my style of playing always leans me towards the Fender tones, which I can dial in pretty good. I typically rely on 3rd party for good Marshall tones.. John Nathan Cordy (YouTube) has repeatedly demonstrated that yea, Helix can nail down Marshall. But, then again, he can nail jello to the wall.

I need to try and clean the switched for sure.. haven't been inside the unit yet. soon

I’ll definitely read the article Craig, thanks. Regarding the MBcomp, I was able to dial in a threshold for the mids for my D18 (Martin) preset which softened the attack (ring sound). Then I went back to the Q setting on my ParaEQ and was able to pull that back some to let some of the problem low-mid frequency back into my tone. So playing the MBcomp and ParaEQ off of each other is a pretty effective tool - especially for acoustic guitar. I’m totally onboard with the MBcomp now, have all ideas I’ll be using it more across my other presets. Look’n fwd to the read..

Yea.. sweet deal there!!

Did a search on the MB Comp and found the above topic, some really good info there so I thought I’d link it and create a new post in lieu of a resurrection. Also, my input is more in line with using the MBcomp specifically to tame the mid EQs on acoustic guitar in addition to the Parametric EQ. I have successfully used the Para for years with my acoustic but recently delved into my main preset to see what I could do to tame the pick attack harshness in the mids. That dead ring sound that I hate. I need another day to re-check with fresh ears, but I think I have found a good use for this MBcomp in this preset, in fact it might even be pretty frigg’n good?!

Ordered mine late 2015 - waitlisted by Sweetwater - arrived Feb, 2016. The M13 was a big part of my signal chain, so I was pretty sure it was gonna be special.. it is. I enjoyed tweaking with the FM9 and can see why it has such a loyal following but from what I could tell on the forums and YouTube, a lot of Fractal owners use 3rd party presets and don’t build their own - whereas it’s the opposite with HX gear.

3.50 presets are the best they’ve ever provided to my ears..

I strolled through them when I first got the Helix, then once or twice after a few of the big updates, most notably v3.5, just to hear and see the settings. But had I kept the FM9 I would have used quite a few of their presets with minor tweaks, they are that good.

Still going strong. The tap tempo/tuner footswitch is a bit quirky but still gets the job done. It doesn’t like flip flops or my house slippers at all - it prefers stiffer soles. Other than that the Helix Floor has been, and continues to remain, on the cutting edge of the growing list of modeling units out there. However, recently I took deliver of an FM9 to play around with just to see what it was all about. One pro the FM9 has over the Helix is that a good many of the factory presets are totally usable as is - very little tweaking required to get going. The next pro - being the unit provides visual metering for input, preset leveling, and output. In fact, at initial set up of the FM9, Fractal strongly suggests that the operator gets these levels adjusted correctly, which ensures the factory presets sound right. That’s about it. Well… it does have more DSP but a non issue for me, I build and use fairly straight fwd presets. I won’t go into all the Helix pros, but naturally there are quite a few for anyone who has spent so much time using it. The most important and obvious being the logical and easy to use interface on the hardware, firmware, and the software. The FX, amps, cabs are tit for tat, subjective, etc. I’m pretty certain most new users that have a hard time liking Helix factory presets - or dialing in great presets is mostly due to the lack of metering/leveling. I discovered (years ago) that building Helix presets via FOH mixer meters made a huge difference. And with Helix Native, metering came along, and everyone realized that made a huge difference as well. I ate the shipping and sent the FM9 back.

Saw this post and went to check for the 3.52 update for my Mac (Logic) and there is none.. 3.51 is still the latest. Only posting as an fyi.

Exactly what I was looking for, I’m attempting the to match the Tech 2112. Downloading both your tones soon and will reply with my results. Thanks!

Working great with mine.. maybe I’m not up to date on OS?

There has been discussion on that subject here and there, not sure if L6 will be doing that though? I feel they should label the product more accurately.. something like “Helix Plug In for DAWs” lol. Having watched several HN YouTube videos it really isn’t clear that the product is a plug in - most screen shots make it look like an app? However, after a few days of using it inside Logic Pro I can tell you it’s pretty much a game changer for tones and recording functionality - acoustic guitar IR tones (HN with Logic Pro EQs) are, for me, some of the best acoustic tones I’ve dialed in to date. Also, I’ve found, it’s best to just build new presets for HN. The ones off my floor unit were ok in HN but not great. Makes sense since my floor unit presets are set up for FOH mono, whereas I am building stereo tones in my DAW.

That is a really good idea. I just installed HN today and have to run the buffer at 128 minimum and it still has a faint lag… mostly in the feel of playing. Still annoying. Tones are really good though. Looking for all ideas.. thanks?