Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Jump to content

rsm0

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Registered Products
    2

rsm0's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

3

Reputation

  1. Thank you! After posting I kept looking online and eventually found this, and ordered it: https://www.seismicaudiospeakers.com/collections/all/products/26-inch-pedal-board-case Still around twice the price of the Rondo cases, but those aren't an option it seems.
  2. Looking for a solid pedal case for light duty protection; a case with a low bottom / high top cover that allows use of the XL while on the case bottom. I have a few from Rondo Music that work great for other floor rigs, but they're all in use, and Rondo music no longer has them in stock. Not looking to pay $200+ for ATA cases which I don't need. What are people using to house their XL? Not looking for a soft case or backpack Here's the Rondo case I wanted but not in stock
  3. Yes, I can; however, I was wondering why these two Helix Native controls don't work, which would allow finer tuning of my Helix Native patches. If I hit the input gain or output level in Helix Native, then I have to reload Helix plugin.
  4. When I load Helix Native into Blue Cat Audio PatchWork (VST Host), if I attempt to adjust the Input Gain or Main out level, it drops to minimum, and won't let me change the value; it "snaps back" to minimum. I have to unload Helix Native and reload it. This is on Windows 11. Everything else in Helix Native works in my configuration except Input Gain and Main (out) Level.
  5. OK, maybe it was this simple and obvious... FX100 amp out (mono) to 150 instrument in. Will this overload the 150 input, causing input clipping? What is the level of the FX100 amp out signal? Real specs, with numbers, are helpful ;)
  6. I haven't played my 150 very loud or live, it would likely work fine for a small club depending on the drummer. Not sure what the actual SPL rating is for the 150, given the 150 watts are shared by all 5 speakers. How much power does the 12" get? How are the 150 watts distributed? What is the actual SPL? Of course, the SPL could vary based on how it's measured, but it's useful info IMO.
  7. :P bump. anyone know? see my question in the post above this one ;)
  8. With the AMPLIFi, I use a patch approach and organize my patches accordingly: e.g., a bank with 1) clean, 2) clean with effects, 3) crunch, 4) dist. Bank up / down to get a different set of sounds, with some variations, organized in the same order... at least using my FX100. Still trying to find out if the Aux in on the 150 is mono or stereo? I'd like to run my FX100 as my modeler into the 150 as just an amp...if the 150 dies, I can go direct with the FX100, if the FX100 dies, I can use the modeling in the 150 (...may need a FBV Express II). Backup with identical patches. :) My AMPLIFi kit is sounding and working great for me...though I still have GAS for the Helix. Dialing in tones is brain dead easy with the app IMO. Maybe someday a Helix derivative will find its way into the 150 form factor ;)
  9. Is the aux in on the 150 mono (TS) or stereo (TRS)? This looks like the "best" or easiest way (no changes to any hardware, software) to run my FX100 (as a modeler) into my 150 (as an amp)!
  10. Line level (theoretically) should be higher than instrument level...this should (theoretically) reduce the noise floor when using a line level signal into the input. When set to line level input, my thought was to default to a patch that uses the drive control as an input level control, and the volume control to control the overall output level (as usual) with everything else in the patch off / removed / disabled. I haven't tried the blank patch approach since I don't have control over the input level and the 150 is expecting instrument level in. In the meantime, I have FRFR solutions for my FX100. Another option - would be the opposite - to use the FX100 as a floor controller for the 150 / 75 (similar to the FBV Express) with all modeling from the 150 / 75. I just found this thread, recommends use of the aux in on the 150 for the FX100 out. http://line6.com/support/topic/8599-connecting-fx100-to-amplifi-150/ Anyone know if the aux in on the 150 is mono/unbalanced (TS) or stereo/balanced (TRS)?
  11. I'm using Windows 10, the Line 6 updater sees both my FX100 and 150. To upgrade the firmware, I have to restart the AMPLIFi in update mode, however, the Updater sees my AMPLIFi. Works fine. Try this... Reboot your computer; keep the AMPLIFi off; connect the usb cable; start the updater; then turn on your AMPLIFi. Wait about 30 seconds - 1 minute; you should see it appear in the Updater list. Let us know what happens?
  12. Now, this is why we need the AMPLIFi 150 to have a line level input setting with input level control and master volume control...so I can use the 150 as an amp and my FX100 as the modeler/controller. http://line6.ideascale.com/a/dtd/Line-level-input-to-use-AMPLIFi-as-amp-for-other-modelers/820470-23508 :)
  13. Cool! I hate spending more money than I need to spend (FBV 3 is $50 more than the FBV Shortboard MkII); I just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything else functionally...besides the multi-color lights :) FBV3 if I was going Firehawk...but if I need more than AMPLIFi, I'll save for a Helix ;)
  14. Same here, nothing but positive experiences with my FX100 (owned it for over a year, purchased new); and my 150 (purchased new, owned it for several weeks). I'd like to be able to use the 150 as an amp, bypassing the modeling and using the FX100 modeling. :) http://line6.ideascale.com/a/dtd/Line-level-input-to-use-AMPLIFi-as-amp-for-other-modelers/820470-23508
×
×
  • Create New...