codamedia

Where did I say it wasn't? Although I don't hear any chorus on that track, getting that sound might require that type of effect. Seeing that the dimension can get very subtle... it has the capability of sounding more natural than most chorus effects. I think we are on the same page :) Although I don't think I hear a chorus on that track, a detune (sometimes referred to as a doubler) could certainly be possible. Unless I am mistaken (always possible) the Helix does not have a dedicated detune effect and that is why I suggested the Dimension.... it's the closest thing to it with all the SW buttons off... IMO. You also state subtle which I agree with 100%. If an effect is actually used (rather than a doubled tracked guitar), it's very subtle.

Are you running 4CM? That is the only time I could see this being an issue, and yes it would be a big compromise. If you are running into the front end of the amp... you shouldn't have to adjust the level leading to the amp once it is set. The input stage of an amp is critical to how the rest of the amp responds downstream. In this case, If I needed more volume at the amp I would simply turn up the amp.

Although Chorus was a popular effect in the 80's.... I don't necessarily hear it on this track. That track is either doubled, multi-miced and panned, or both! It's a huge tone, but as you say - soft! If you want to soften the track and mimic this doubling try the Dimension effect. It will be under "modulation/legacy". I would start by setting all the "SW Buttons" to OFF, then bring the MIX down so it becomes very subtle. Another option (if you are using amp/cab blocks) is to use a DUAL Cabinet... Set one cabinet with a dynamic mic at about 1", the other with the 121 (ribbon) around 6" - 8". This option sounds best in stereo, but will still soften the track in MONO. The other thing to add is the LA Studio Comp. Place it at the end of the path. Set the gain reduction so the meters are just starting to read... nothing extreme.

I would approach this a little different... Rather than placing the IR on a parallel path, place a "SEND" just prior to the IR block and use that to drive your amp/cab. You can fine tune the send level to get the signal going to your amp exactly how you want it... then it should never have to be touched again. This opens the option to move your delays and reverbs to the 2nd path allowing for better DSP management. NOTE: I see you already have two effects loops on your path.... my solution will only work if you still have an available send to use. I use an LT that only has two mono loops, but I believe you have double that with the Floor model.

Have you overlooked "Stomp mode"? You can assign any effect block you want to a footswitch The MODE button will toggle you to STOMP Mode and the effects will appear like stomp boxes. Snapshot bypass on any block will separate that effects on/off state from snapshots so they are completely independent. There is "preset mode", "snapshot mode" & "stomp mode". The Helix can be setup to in a variety of ways to display these in a manner that suit you best. If you are not aware of all your options, it might be a good idea to revisit the manual and/or some tutorials.

I highly doubt it.... That would require "usb host" capability which HX devices are not. The Helix family are peripherals that need to connect to a host.

You seem to have overlooked the "snapshot bypass" feature that came with one of the latest firmware updates. You can set the on/off state of any effect to be completely bypassed by snapshots, therefore they operate just like stomp boxes in real life. FWIW... this is how I setup my Helix LT for LIVE use. I don't tone match every song.... I get the core tones I need from an instrument and apply effects as necessary. Presets: Each guitar I own has it's own preset. When I grab my tele I step on the Tele preset. When I grab my strat I step on the Strat preset, if I sit at my pedal steel I kick in that preset, etc... etc...etc... (this also applies to my baritone, 5 string banjo, mandolin, acoustic, dobro, and gut string) Snapshots: Within each preset, I use snapshots to call up my core tones. EG: For my tele my snaps might be "twang", "crunch", "classic rock" etc... etc... The Strat might be "Quack", "Blues", "Gilmour", etc... etc.. The names don't matter, it's just the core tones that I work with. Loading the snap will also adjust the parameters of the stomp effects to best match those tones. Stomps: At my disposal I have 9 stomp boxes (including toe switch) I can engage/disengage at will just like a pedal board. Those include a tube screamer, chorus (dimension), phase, delay, boost, wah, etc... etc... Some are snapshot bypassed and some are not. The result of this approach.... (for me) I never change presets unless I am changing instruments I choose a snapshot at the beginning of a song, and rarely change it during a song...but can if I need to I have a pedal board of 9 effects at my disposal... all optimized for each snapshot.

I would think that is asking a lot.... Roland has a 35 - 40 year head start in the guitar synth world over Line 6 :) Kidding aside, I agree with your post completely. Another thing that could change things (for me anyway) would be pitch to midi. With polyphonic pitch detection.... if those pitches could be converted to MIDI I could simply utilize any one of my synth/sound modules as needed.

I'm with you on this one. I'm not against the people getting their touch screen if they want it, but If the next generation includes one I certainly hope they still include an alternate option for navigation (joystick or buttons) and the ability to turn off the touch screen for those that don't get along with it.

I quoted the appropriate part of your statement.... and bolded the line that bugged me. If I took that line out of context, then I'm sorry... it's not worded very clearly. But every time I re-read it, it still rubs me the wrong way.

You buy the Helix based on what it can do with the firmware available the day you bought it, and the anticipation that future updates MIGHT be things you will enjoy and/or use. You do not buy the Helix to gain the right to insist it should have a feature you want. You can request it, but that doesn't mean they owe it to you.

A month or so back DI suggested a "sleeper" feature in V3 that can/will only be available in the Helix, LT and Rack. I haven't seen the feature revealed yet... but may have missed it. My guess was disqualified pretty quickly (DSP balancing)... but do you know if your wish for Global Blocks was ever disqualified? If not... there might be hope. When you first brought this up a while back I wasn't sold on it. But over the last year or so I've certainly had that "aha" moment several times.... I would definitely make use of that feature.

The Studio Pre and Amp models add a lot of color.... I'm sure the reason "guitarno" is saying he doesn't use those, is because his acoustic IR is the color. For that type of setup.... and if you need more gain/volume, the simple "gain" block is very transparent (no added color/tone) and gets the job done.

LOL!!! No it is not cancelled. It's a major update that is on the horizon. It's next, be patient :)

^^^ this ^^^ When going wireless IEM, you really do get what you pay for. There is a reason they cost what they do, and the added features of a proper system are worth every penny. When I need a wireless IEM... they are generally provided by the acts I play with (in reality, the sound company's they lease the gear from for the tour). I just need to bring my ear pieces. For the smaller gigs I use in-ears I just use a "wired" IEM setup. Zero latency or drop outs and very inexpensive, but you are tethered to a cable. As you say... no free lunch :)

For now there is just a work around as already mentioned.... But I am pretty sure I saw this on the feature list for the next firmware update (Ver 3)... it was one of the very few things let out of the bag about V3. I hope I am not mistaken, or been duped :)

You have already succeeded where many struggle! You have freed yourself from traditional amps. IMO... Don't look back, move forward and look into adding a good FRFR to your setup!

Seems you are more interested in Quantity over Quality. I use a few Zoom products myself (including a G3).... they are great for the price. But seriously, they are not at the level of the HX line. Anything in a Zoom that starts with "Z-....." the Z stands for Zoom! It's an effect they created, not a replication of anything in particular. That's why you won't find it in the Line 6 model list. That doesn't mean there isn't something comparable, or even better.... you just might have to get creative! OR.... best of both worlds! Put the Zoom in one of the loops and use it whenever you want.

This is not up for debate in 2020. install the 64 bit system unless your computer cannot handle it.... which would be a very old computer. There is no benefit to running a 32 bit system any longer... it's time to move forward! 32 bit programs will run on 64 bit Operation systems. The only issue that can occur is if you have old (very, very old) devices (printers, scanners, audio interface, etc... etc...) that don't have 64 bit drivers.

@surfsup1955.... I see you have sorted this out, I'm just adding that I have always found the default setting of -18 to be a SAFE zone to start with. Just a little minor tweaking from there is all you should need. Another thing I don't see mentioned in this thread is the MIX parameter. Under normal circumstances, make sure that is set to 100% for a cabinet, which is the default setting unless you change it! Anything less than that will allow some "non cabinet" tones through, which would not be normal. Sure, there might be times you will want to experiment here, I'm just laying out the best place to start :)

That's also my experience with IR's or even the Stock cabs. Not surprisingly, it's also been my experience with real cabinets/speakers :) I find a cabinet choice is just as effective (dramatic) as changing an amp model, sometimes ever more. As everyone stated already..... there is no best, just preference. Keep in mind that an IR is not just a cabinet or speaker. It's a combination of cabinet, speaker(s), mic choice, mic placement, mic combinations. Anything other than "close mic position" will include some level of room sound. Those mics are then plugged into MIC pre's that will have their own color, and some company's also process the IR's further (EQ, Filters) while others will not! How much do you really understand those IR's you are swapping in/out?

True, but the BIG Volume knob can only cut volume..... the global EQ has the ability to BOOST or CUT. Seeing that he is trying to BOOST volume TO the FRFR only, I believe it is a viable option! As long as he isn't using it already for another purpose. I agree.... IMO, it's a handy tool for many problems you may encounter. I was just offering another option for it's use :)

NAMM is the time for announcements. Their is a Winter NAMM and a Summer NAMM... Line 6 generally announces new items at the Winter NAMM, and delivery starts a few months later. If I were in the market for a high ticket product, I doubt I would buy something shortly (2 - 3 month window) before Winter NAMM. If it wasn't announced there, I'd weigh my options between "buy now" and "wait indefinitely/impatiently"!

Just a suggestion.... Instead of using the output block to increase your level for your FRFR, why not use level control on the Global EQ? You can apply it so it only effects the output you use for the FRFR, and therefore the USB should be back to normal - or close to it! The suggestions above about getting your output levels right and consistent are dead on... I'm just offering a quick and easy solution for increasing level to your FRFR if you feel you really need it!

Well.... I use Studio One and I can think of 1000 different ways to screw up the INPUT levels within the DAW itself.... regardless of the interface used. It DOES have input level adjustment, and I can also insert any effect (compressor, console emulator, gain controls, EQ's, etc.... etc..... ) on any inputs. But in fairness, the OP uses Cakewalk/Bandlab.... which I do not use. Maybe it doesn't have a way to effect the input levels, maybe it does! I am merely suggesting that a closer look might be warranted before completely writing it off without knowing for certain!